Safety audit defined

Electronic records requiring particular regulatory control should be identified based on critical process control points and associated critical parameters that directly impact product quality or product safety. A defined process should be used to conduct this analysis, and it should be one that builds on or is complementary to any assessment conducted as part of product registration. Consistency is key. There may be additional records identified by predicate rules but care must be taken not to extend beyond these records. A risk assessment should be conducted to determine appropriate electroific record management controls such as audit trail and archiving. Electronic records will need to be archived for retention periods specified in predicate rules. Other data related to process performance rather than product quality or product safety requires only basic data maintenance and may be retained for much shorter periods before being purged. 

According to the realistic environment faced by the safety audit and safety audit report users determine the purpose of the safety audit objectives, only by determining the safety audit objectives at first, can we define the direction of activities. The theoretical structure of safety audit in the target is a priority position which reflects and embodies the essence of the safety audit requirements. To achieve the audit objectives, we need to clear the contents of the safety audit, scientific design of safety audit model and select the appropriate audit procedures and methods. Meanwhile, we should ultimately the formation of appropriate safety audit reports through information disclosure and accountability mechanisms in order to achieve the established safety audit functions of development services for safety audit external environment. 

In Safety Audits, A Guide for the Chemical Industry, issued by the Chemical Industries Association Limited, it is implied that the major objective of a safety audit is to determine the effectiveness of a company s safety and loss prevention measures. It is also proposed that whatever the objectives, it is important that they be clearly defined. 

It is clear that proactive safety control is needed. Safety audits measure the management work being done to control losses, and are therefore vital performance indicators in the safety system. An audit will define what work needs to be done to improve safety and health management. 

In British Columbia, New Brunswick and Alberta, Road Safety Audits have been successfully used on three Public—Private Partnership highway projects. These routes had Road Safety Audits conducted at all stages of design and construction. The auditors were an integral part of the bidding, design and build process. This type of project usually has a well-defined design-build specification. Experience has shown that this document must have the safety aspects and the safety risk well defined. 

It is possible to derive direct and objective definitions of the other success indices in Figure 7.3 and to use these to estimate overall achievement. Involvement, for example, can be defined by recording participation in voluntary programs, and incidents of corrective action can be counted in a number of situations. You can chart the number of safety work orders turned in and completed, the number of safety audits conducted and safety suggestions given, and the number of safety improvements occurring as a result of near-hit reports. 

Described as follows are two tools that are used extensively in measuring field compliance the audit and the inspection. I define these two tools as related but different. The main differences between them are in their scope. Many health and safety professionals do not realize or believe that there is a difference between the safety program and the site-specific safety plan. Similarly, many health and safety professionals will not admit to a difference between the safety inspection and safety audit, but there is a difference—and the difference is substantial. Safety inspections, and why these safety inspections are important, is discussed in the following section. After completing the discussion on safety inspections, safety audits are discussed. 

Thus for the particular assessment or auditing skill of Performing a Safety Audit, the relevant guidance in the Blue Book is TSA4 Safety Auditing and this has three levels of competence defined for Supervised Practitioner, Practitioner and Expert. 

The Road Safety Audit process for schemes led by new developments has been addressed in HD 19/15. The standard states that where highway improvement schemes (as defined in the standard) are carried out on the trunk road and motorway network as part of a development scheme. Road Safety Audits will be carried out as set out in the standard. This means that suitably qualified Road Safety Audit teams should undertake the work and that the commisioning, auditing, reporting and response procedures need to be undertaken in accordance with the standard. For example, the Stage 1 Road Safety Audit process must be completed to the satisfaction of the Project Sponsor before planning consent is given. 

These documents define what is meant by infrastructure projects and highway improvements , to make it clear what sort of schemes are subject to Road Safety Audits. For example, HD 19/15 permits schemes that have no impact on road users behaviour, and some Uke-for-Uke maintenance replacements, to be exempt. 

The team leader is usually an established highly trained expert in performing Road Safety Audits. Others on the team may not be specifically trained or experienced auditors but are experts in their own respective disciplines. In many cases, the various individuals participating in the Road Safety Audit have not worked with each other before. When the team is assembled with a start-up meeting, the effort is usually preceded by several hours of onsite training or orientation by the team leader defining the process that will... 

Road Safety Audit procedures in the Netherlands require the audit team to ascribe a severity class to each safety problem raised (see the next section for more on risk assessment) the severity classes are defined in Table 10.1. The severity class is used by the Project Sponsor to assist in prioritising the audit team s findings. 

Do audits assess that quality and safety activities comply with planned activities, that the quality and safety system are effective and that defined procedures and methods are being followed ... 

When implementing a metrics system, it is important to ensure the process safety data is reviewed for accuracy. Inaccurate data can lead to poor decisions and focus improper priority to issues. Worse, inaccurate data may focus attention away from serious performance deficiencies. The metrics system designer needs to define the methods that will be used to validate data entered into the metrics system. There are several techniques for validating data many of the techniques have been developed through quality-based efforts and auditing methods. The following is not a detailed how to for developing a validation method, but rather introduces topics for further research. 

When auditing a site or a plant, we rely on clearly defined criteria to produce an environmental and safety profile. Separate audits are conducted to determine the occupational health conditions at a facility. A site s performance profile covers both hard facts such as accident numbers and emission levels, as well as soft facts such as effective organizational structures, defined responsibilities, and a... 

Medicinal products must be fit for their intended use, comply with the requirements of Market Authorization and not place patients at risk because of inadequate safety, quality or efficacy. These objectives are easy to state, but to achieve them requires a comprehensively designed and correctly implemented system of quality assurance. It is important that this is documented and its effectiveness monitored. Records must be kept that are open to inspection by validating bodies, and there must also be procedures for selfinspection and quality audit that allow appraisal of the quality assurance system. Management must be adequately trained and their responsibilities minutely defined. Two key posts are the Heads of Production and of Quality Control. These posts are required by the guidelines to be independent of one another. 

Caps are established, with margins of safety, and completed facility TDML plans and strategies are provided to the EPA for approval or disapproval. The time defined within a TDML plan does not necessarily have to eqnal 1 day, and a reserve for future polluting activities is typically comprehended. Approved agencies or parties will regularly audit site performance against a facility s TMDL plan. 

---