Audit assessment

Do audits assess that quality and safety activities comply with planned activities, that the quality and safety system are effective and that defined procedures and methods are being followed ... 

These lists tell us something about the nature of quality records, especially by what is not included. Absent from the lists are policies, procedures, instructions, plans, specifications, and any other prescriptive documents. The records all have one thing in common they describe the results of some activity - the results of inspections, tests, reviews, audits, assessments, calculations, etc. However, these lists are dominated by records relating to product quality rather than to the operations of the quality system. In addition to audit records, the following records may need to be maintained to demonstrate the effectiveness of the quality system ... 

Another annoying feature of most audit assessment tools is that they provide information about the vulnerabilities found, and not the ones that do not exist in the information system. It is therefore difficult to practice anticorrelation and degrade the severity of events that are not security risks for the information system. To obtain this effect, we currently manually maintain a set of simple rules indicating which vulnerability sets cannot be found in our corporate network. For example, we exclude all IIS vulnerabilities from events coming from hosting zones, as we do not offer this platform in our services. Note that we do not consider here the case where the vulnerability assessment tool fails to discover the vulnerability. Audit information is considered trusted. 

Now we need to understand how to apply these ideas as a strategy, to go beyond particular problems that are brought to our attention, to address all the components of sampling. In this chapter, we propose an approach to sampling that uses the previous theoretical information in a practical way. The strategy has three parts audit, assessment, and action. 

The CAP Gap Audit assessment tool grades a corporation s CSR/SRI performance and generates readiness indicators for the top-ranking standards. Risk areas are flagged, performance is documented, and results are delivered in a concise high-impact executive report or on-site presentation. Figure 4.18 illustrates one of the reporting features - Readiness Indicators - for the major accountability standards that the CAP Gap Audit reprises. 

The two main efforts in conducting an audit are (1) Review and understanding of the policy and procedure documents for the management sys-tem(s) and (2) Assessment of expected system outcomes through reviews of records, through interviews, and by observations. The baseline audit assesses both Numbers 1 and 2 but typically directs most of its attention to Number 1. In contrasL the full management systems audit also assesses both Numbers 1 and 2 but typically directs most of its time and effort to Number 2. 

Safety Lifecycle activities including audits, assessments, and verifications. 

Participating and supporting internal and external audits, assessments, and self-assessments of SNL/NM Industrial Hygiene Program. 

The application of an audit/assessment process is referred by Salama et al. (2009) as an important step companies should perform in order to achieve business improvements and face the competitive pressure of today s high dynamic markets. They also argue that sometimes process related problems are not solved because companies fail to identify them, and on the other hand, the evaluation of innovative technologies or managerial practices can represent a way not only to solve hidden problems, but also to develop new business models and allow to do things that the organization is not already doing. 

Results of the verification are documented in such a way that the documentation can be used directly for internal reviews and external audits, assessments and inspections, see for example Figure 4. 

The term is not used in ISO 26262, but does not mean any contradiction Those ideas and terms are illustrated in ISO 26262 in a different or similar context. For example coexistence of software of different criticality (different ASIL) doesn t see a risk if functions are similar but if these functions can influence each other negatively. Furthermore, it is important to mention that ISO 26262 uses and defines the terms validate, verify, analyze, audit, assessment and review in context of functional safety for road vehicles differentiy. These examples also show that requirements, terms or definitions within ISO 26262, depending from which activity or context they are used, can lead to different interpretations or meanings. 

As mentioned in the previous chapter, an audit is not the same thing as an inspection. Essentially, the audit assesses the organisation s ability to meet its own (defined) standards on a wide front, rather than providing a snapshot of a particular site or premises. Each has its uses, but inspections are part of the active monitoring system (see above) and audits are an element of a coherent ongoing management system. Inspections are often made as a part of the audit process. 

Review of any audits, assessments, unsolved problems, or inspections... 

The safety analyses typically include a review of crash history to see if a crash problem exists. However, some states are incorporating new safety tools and methods to include road safety audits/assessments and the application of safety models found in the new Highway Safety Manual. 

The RIMP process was Initiated and is being conducted In a manner that assures the relevant SRS specific Issues are being addressed. Through the rigorous application of comprehensive RIMP evaluation criteria, potential safety Issues were dispositioned. The completeness of the RIMP process ensured that restart sensitive Issues were identified in a timely manner. The overall success of this program Is due. In part, to the contribution made by the Issue Management Committee. As supported by the various audits, assessments and surveillances, the RIMP process has proven to be very thorough. 

---