Risk tools exposure

Radiation from a dirty bomb can emanate from a blast site in a contaminated plume of smoke or in contaminated debris. Radiation cannot be detected without special instruments, and radiation exposures can occur even without direct contact. Therefore, leaving a damaged building does not eliminate the risk of exposure. An effective tool to minimize or eliminate the potential for hazardous substance exposure is to move away from the site of the attack and into a building that provides protection from airborne contaminants. 

Exposure Assessment. As noted above, the Risk Assistant software is intended to build on EPA s existing information base on environmental fate and transport modelling, extending it to risk-relevant exposure calculations. Accordingly, it does not incorporate mathematical models of the environmental transport and fate of chemicals, but takes as its starting point user-specified data on environmental concentrations of chemicals to which people might be exposed. The Additional Analyses discussed below, however, do include tools to assist the risk assessor in selecting appropriate transport models. 

Minimize the risk for exposure by using appropriate gloves (probably nitrile gloves) and/or tools to handle hot objects. 

It will be the responsibility of the Safety Officer/Safety Division to inform employees of the hazards that they may be exposed to in the workplace. The primary goal of the Chemical Hygiene Plan is to protect employees from hazards through an extensive training program that will provide the employee the necessary tools required to minimize the risk of exposure in the laboratory. 

Tools are available to assist in comparing the risk associated with two or more different processes. For example, the first sheet of the Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI) (Dow, 1994b) ranks the safety characteristics of the process from a fire/explosion standpoint, without taking credit for protective and mitigation features. The Dow Chemical Exposure Index (CEI) (Dow, 1994a) and Id s Mond Index (ICI, 1985 Tyler, 1985) are other ranking tools. 

A Resources to identify chemicals of concern B Chemical toxicity C Exposure assessment tools D Hazard and risk assessment tools E Safer chemistry design tools... 

Information on exposure levels is fundamental for the assessment and management of health risks related to occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Biological monitoring is a primary tool for exposure evaluation,... 

There is a growing need to better characterize the health risk related to occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Risk characterization is a basic step in the assessment and management of the health risks related to chemicals (Tordoir and Maroni, 1994). Evaluation of exposure, which may be performed through environmental and biological monitoring, is a fundamental component of risk assessment. Biomarkers are useful tools that may be used in risk assessment to confirm exposure or to quantify it by estimating the internal dose. Besides their use in risk assessment, biomarkers also represent a fundamental tool to improve the effectiveness of medical and epidemiological surveillance. 

Any analysis of risk should recognize these distinctions in all of their essential features. A typical approach to acute risk separates the stochastic nature of discrete causal events from the deterministic consequences which are treated using engineering methods such as mathematical models. Another tool if risk analysis is a risk profile that graphs the probability of occurrence versus the severity of the consequences (e.g., probability, of a fish dying or probability of a person contracting liver cancer either as a result of exposure to a specified environmental contaminant). In a way, this profile shows the functional relationship between the probabilistic and the deterministic parts of the problem by showing probability versus consequences. 

For acute releases, the fault tree analysis is a convenient tool for organizing the quantitative data needed for model selection and implementation. The fault tree represents a heirarchy of events that precede the release of concern. This heirarchy grows like the branches of a tree as we track back through one cause built upon another (hence the name, "fault tree"). Each level of the tree identifies each antecedent event, and the branches are characterized by probabilities attached to each causal link in the sequence. The model appiications are needed to describe the environmental consequences of each type of impulsive release of pollutants. Thus, combining the probability of each event with its quantitative consequences supplied by the model, one is led to the expected value of ambient concentrations in the environment. This distribution, in turn, can be used to generate a profile of exposure and risk. 

This chapter considers the recently developed tools and the latest versions of the old tools. Some of the tools comprise not only the environmental compartments used on environmental risk assessment but also the human compartment necessary for human health risk assessment. For this reason, when summarizing the models, as described in the second part of this chapter, several characteristics of human compartment are discussed as well. However, a detailed description of human compartment together with a wide range of tools developed for exposure and human risk assessment is presented in the next chapter. 

FUN tool is a new integrated software based on a multimedia model, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models and associated databases. The tool is a dynamic integrated model and is capable of assessing the human exposure to chemical substances via multiple exposure pathways and the potential health risks (Fig. 9) [70]. 2-FUN tool has been developed in the framework of the European project called 2-FUN (Full-chain and UNcertainty Approaches for Assessing Health Risks in FUture ENvironmental Scenarios www.2-fun.org). 

Despite the fact that there exist some differences between both methodologies, the cooperation between the aforementioned tools seems to be advantageous to use in environmental management [7]. Moreover, there are also steps in LCIA that also exist in the risk assessment (i.e., exposure assessment). Therefore, models used in LCIA can be used also to assess human or environmental exposure to chemicals. For that reason LCIA models are also included in the review of models of risk assessment. 

It is interesting to mention that USEtox is mainly a tool for LCIA studies where characterization factors are obtained for a wide list of substances. However, the model also provides intermediate output parameters (e.g., intake doses, concentrations in environmental compartments, substance exposure) that can be used for risk assessment studies. This was the case in the present study comparing the values from USEtox with reference limit values. 

However, as a general observation, this study demonstrated the feasibility of the integrated modeling approach to couple an environmental multimedia and a PBPK models, considering multi-exposure pathways, and thus the potential applicability of the 2-FUN tool for health risk assessment. The global sensitivity analysis effectively discovered which input parameters and exposure pathways were the key drivers of Pb concentrations in the arterial blood of adults and children. This information allows us to focus on predominant input parameters and exposure pathways, and then to improve more efficiently the performance of the modeling tool for the risk assessment. 

---