Exposure calculations

Cullis, C.R, and Firth, J.G. (ed.) (1988) Detection and Measurement of Hazardous Gases, Hememann, London. Daugherty, J., (1997) Assessment of Chemical Exposures Calculation Methods for Environmental Professionals, Lewis Publishing, London. 

For each clironic exposure padiway (i.e., seven years to lifetime exposure), calculate a sepmate clironic hazard index from die rados of the clironic daily intake (GDI) to die clironic reference dose (RfD) for individual chemicals as described below ... 

For each subclironic exposure pathway (i.e., two weeks to seven year exposure), calculate a separate subclironic hazard index from die ratios of subclironic daily... 

Based upon the various sources of adult consumer exposure to organotin compounds (section 6) and the TDI values derived above, it is possible to estimate the relative exposure from the various organotin compounds expressed as a percentage of the TDI values. The exposure calculations in section 6 were based on a realistic worst-case exposure assessment. Table 26 presents the results of this risk characterization. 

The collection of air samples using air tubes and/or filters is of value during the course of the field research when performing SDDBM studies. The air tube/air filter data can be used to estimate the portion of the total body burden, which originates from respiratory exposure to the active ingredient. Of course, if an organic vapor respirator is used by the worker as a matter of course, the respiratory exposure component should be backed out of the final exposure calculation. 

Figure 4. Dependence of the chlorine content of C-PVC on the film thickness, after 7h of UV exposure. Calculated curves if the chlorination were restricted to the 20 pm (—) or 30 ym (...) top layer...

Exposure calculation to the emission calculations involving impact of emissions on humans and ecosystem of the emissions means the impact calculation of the dose from the increased concentration. The impact calculation is followed by calculation of impacts (damage in physical units) from this dose, using a dose-response function. The impact of WEEE substances on health and the environment is location specific and is based on conditional, that is to say the way the WEEE is taken care of. Hence, the exposure assessment relates to the population and the ecosystem being exposed to the externalities. 

Recent experiential work suggests that heat flux is a more realistic method of determine the heat transmission into fire barriers. Typical heat flux values of 30-50 kw/sq. m (9,375 - 15,625 Btu/sq./ft.) for pool fires and 200-300 kw/sq./m (62,500 - 93,750 Btu/sq. ft.) for jet fires is normally the basis of heat flux exposure calculations. 

Table 5 Changes in the crystallite size of some polycyclic pigments in coatings or plastics coloration as a result of heat exposure (calculated from the X-ray diffraction spectra).

Such estimates yield an exaggerated level of exposure, but for many pesticides, exposure at the TMRC is far below the RfD and does not result in cancer risks greater than 1 x 10 . In some cases, where the exaggerated levels of exposure for the TMRC exceed the RfD or cause the cancer risk to exceed 1 X 10 , the exposure calculations may require refinements, such as using more realistic residue levels or adjusting pesticide use estimations. If these or other more comprehensive adjustments still do not result in acceptable levels of exposure, the EPA will not approve tolerances for the pesticide. 

In 2005, the EES A [62] made an estimation of PAE exposure in human populations based on the limited available literature on DEHP, DBP, BBP, DiNP, and DiDP concentration in foods and diets. Some studies have been conducted in two different populations in United Kingdom (UK) and Denmark from 1996 to 2003 [124—129]. Based on the information obtained from the mentioned studies, the EFSA estimated the daily oral intake and the maximum dietary exposure (calculated in the 95th percentile) (MDE) for the most used PAEs (Table 3). 

USEPA performed post hoc cost-benefit calculations and sensitivity analyses for several regulatory options (41). Population exposure calculations were prepared for pre- and postregulation scenarios, and risks were calculated by using the CAG multistage model. A cost of 200,000 per cancer case avoided was assumed on the basis of both earnings and social value. 

This methodology was a first approach to estimate population exposure, calculated as the total daily values above the thresholds recommended by the European Commission Directive for long- and short-term health effects. Obtained results revealed that in Lisbon city centre a large number of persons are exposed to PM levels exceeding the legislated daily limit value of 50 pg m 3. 

The Monte Carlo exposure calculations described in this chapter are carried out with a flexible computer software program named DistGEN (Sielken Inc., 1995). This program allows exposure equations to be specified in the general computer language called FORTRAN, so they can have practically any form. Furthermore, the user-specified distributions for the components of the exposure equations can be selected from a wide variety of classical statistical distributions (normal, log-normal, etc. with user-specified parameter values) or from sample data (either the sample... 

Exposure assessment is done under the strong assumptions that (1) an adequate model for exposure calculation is on hand and (2) sufficient data about all influential exposure factors are available. The calculation is a prognosis about the expected level of exposure or the burden. Direct methods of exposure assessment, such as personal sampling (air, radiation), duplicate studies (nutrition) and human biomonitoring, provide information on a measurement level. The exposure assessors and the risk managers should balance the reasons for using prognostic techniques instead of direct exposure measurement methods. Both should anticipate critical questions about the validity of the exposure assessment technique in the course of public risk communication. Questions heard by the authors from concerned persons include, for example ... 

Only in cases when regulators require information during evaluation or enforcement would detailed exposure calculations need to be submitted by a company. The recommendations would serve as a regulatory reference source for formulators or manufacturers. Therefore, a downstream user would only need to communicate a chemical use upstream for registration purposes when it believed the chemical application in a manufacturing process fell outside the exposure scenarios for which a recommendation or recommendation equivalent applies. 

Another powerful feature of the Monte Carlo approach is that it can reflect dependencies among the components in an exposure calculation. For example. 

---