Relief valves impact

If tv o-phase flow situations are not recognized, pressure drop problems may develop which can prevent systems from operating. It requires very little percentage of vapor, generally above 7% to 8%, to establish volumes and flow velocities that must be solved by two-phase flow analysis. The discharge flow through a pressure relief valve on a process reactor is often an important example where two-phase flow exists, and must be recognized for its back pressure impact. 

Process Facilities 15 Area electrical classification 16 Accessibility for mechanical integrity (sampling, maintenance, repairs) 17 Protection of piping and vessels from vehicles and forklifts 18 Protection of small-bore lines, fittings from external impact, personnel 19 Routing of process piping, critical controls cable trays, critical utilities 20 Vent, drain, and relief valve discharge locations... 

Roberts makes clear that P is intended to be the vapor pressure when the failure occurs. In a BLEVE, this might be the relief valve setting Pq, whereas in a fireball resulting from an impact failure, it will be the vapor pressure at ambient temperature, as is used in FLARE (described in Appendix C). For a fireball following a release of gas (as opposed to liquefied gas), P should be the storage pressure. 

The fuel tank must be resistant to corrosion, mechanical impact, temperature fluctuations, and internal pressure increases. Caps must not permit fuel to escape when the vehicle is turning, traveling up and down steep grades, or when subjected to minor jolts. Also, the tank must be fitted with appropriate relief valves to permit the escape of excessive pressure. 

Reliability of the safety relief valves were developed to show that the new steam generation capability has not impact in the relief system. Re-circulation system and the performance and capability of the pumps and control system were evaluated, changes in the pump performance were identified, it also has impact in the heat balance. 

The System 80+ Standard Design addresses the integrity of the RCS under low temperature and pressure conditions by focusing on the issues that impact RCS and reactor vessel integrity (i.e., relief valves, limiting conditions for operation, reactor vessel materials, and vessel manufacturing techniques). 

On November 26, 1993, the USNRC issued Information Notice 93-89, "Potential Problems witii BWR Level Instrumentation Backfill Modifications," to alert licensees to potential problems that have been identified involving hardware modifications to the reactor vessel water level instrumentation system. This information involved the potential to pressurize the reference legs of the water level instrumentation if a backfill system is installed with the injection point on the instrumentation side of the manual isolation valve in the reference leg. If that valve is closed inadvertently during backfill system operation, the closure could result in a severe plant transient. At some plants, valve closure would cause all safety relief valves to open and potentially impact ECCS response. Licensees were advised to review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. 

Figure 4.8 shows the structure of a bow-tie diagram, which consists of an event tree that creates a top event, the safeguards and controls for which are analyzed with a fault tree. At the left of the diagram is the hazard, say a vessel containing hydrocarbons stored under pressure. Threats are events such as corrosion, external impact, and operating error, which could create an undesired event, in this case a release of hydrocarbons from the vessel. Between the threats and the undesired outcome are barriers such as operator training, relief valves and instrumentation. 

In the case of a balanced-bellows relief valve, the impact of general back pressure depends on the percentage of overpressure and is known as the back-pressure correction factor. For 10% overpressure, the back-pressure correction factor is 1 up to 30% general back pressure. For 16% overpressure, the correction factor does not change (value = 1) up to 37% back pressure, and for 21% overpressure, fhe correction factor does not change (value = 1) up to 50% back pressure. 

This essentially means the failure of an individual drive of a pump, compressor, fan, and so on. Failure of a single motor does not always mean it will affect only one relief valve. Depending on the drive that fails, the relief can be substantial. The following situations should be considered carefully in evaluating the impact of local power failure ... 

Moreover, it can be observed that numerous mutual dependencies (e.g., between EquipmentSpecification and PID) as well as circular dependencies (e.g., between classes LineList, InstrumentSpecification, and SafetyValveSpecification) exist between the document classes. Usually, such dependencies arise if several versions or revisions of the documents are created during project execution. For instance, in the case of the mentioned circular dependencies, a first version of the LineList is created, based on which the InstrumentSpecification can be developed. The SafetyValveSpecification in turn requires some input from the InstrumentSpecification (namely the sizing information of the control valves). The SafetyValveSpecification, however, has an impact on the LineList, as all piping connected to a safety valve has to be sized according to the specified relief rates, such that a second version of the LineList needs to be established. 

Task (4) The ISS is assembled as a single, inseparable container, requiring only one manual service valve, one solenoid, and one thermally activated pressure relief device, all incorporated into a gas control module (see Figure 4). The added cost and complexity of redundant components when using multiple, separable CH2 tanks is avoided by this approach. The gas control system is safeguarded from physical damage with impact absorbing foam... 

Nickel Steel. Steels containing 3-1/2, 5 and 9% nickel also require impact tests to determine their suitability for low temperature operation. The 3-1/2 and 5% nickel steels may be used down to -150°F and require stress relief after welds and forming operations. Nine percent nickel steel requires no stress relief and is usable down to -325°F, however, valves, fittings, and piping are not readily available. 

This upset initiates a runaway reaction that can catastrophically rupture the reactor. The impact of this event was judged to be extensive, which, as discussed in Table 6 Note 1, leads to a tolerable frequency of 10 /year for a single scenario. Several failures in the control system could cause this upset, with operating experience indicating that this type of upset occurs about once every 10 years. Protection per Table 5 was the Shortstop addition, but the runaway reaction may be too fast for the operator to respond to an alarm. This protection layer is not included for risk reduction. The area is normally occupied, so it was assumed that personnel could be impacted by the event. The pressure safety valves (PSVs) are only estimated to be 90% effective, since plugging is a common problem in this service. Since the PSVs share a common relief line, they are conservatively considered to be a single Independent Protection Layer. This led to an intermediate event likelihood of a 10 per year. Per the conservative assumptions used in this example, only the PSVs qualified as an IPL. The PHA team reviewed all the process safety risk issues and decided that a SIF was appropriate. As shown in Table 7, this requires a SIL 3 SIF. 

---