E Quantitative Transfer of Liquids

The dual-pipette technique allows quantitative separation of different IT and ET processes simultaneously occurring at the liquid/liquid interface (e.g., simple transfer of potassium, facilitated transfer of the same ion with a crown ether, and IT of supporting electrolyte). It can also be used to overcome potential window limitations and study numerous important reactions occurring at high positive or negative voltages applied across an ITIES (e.g., transfers of alkali metals from water to organic media). 

As a result of Eq. (11) we are able to calculate the chemical potential of any molecule X in any liquid system S, relative to the chemical potential in a conductor, i.e. at the North Pole. Hence, COSMO-RS provides us with a vehicle that allows us to bring any molecule from its Uquid state island to the North Pole and from there to any other liquid state, e.g. to aqueous solution. Thus, given a liquid, or a reasonable estimate of AGjis of a soUd, COSMO-RS is able to predict the solubility of the compound in any solvent, not only in water. The accuracy of the predicted AG of transfer of molecules between different Uquid states is roughly 0.3 log units (RMSE) [19, 22] with the exception of amine systems, for which larger errors occur [16, 19]. Quantitative comparisons with other methods will be presented later in this article. 

This natural circulation occurs by a direct transfer of momentum across the interface, and the presence of a monolayer at the interface will affect it in two ways. Firstly, the surface viscosity of the monolayer may cause a dissipation of energy and momentum at the surface, so that the drop behaves rather more as a solid than as a liquid, i.e., the internal circulation is reduced. Secondly, momentum transfer across the surface is reduced by the incompressibility of the film, which the moving stream of gas will tend to sweep to the rear of the drop (Fig. 14b) whence, by its back-spreading pressure n, it resists further compression and so damps the movement of the surface and hence the transfer of momentum into the drop. This is discussed quantitatively below, where Eq. (32) should apply equally well to drops of liquid in a gas. 

As noted earlier, virtually all liquid and semisolid products involve the unit of operation of mixing. In fact, in many instances, it is the primary unit operation. Even its indirect effects, e.g., on heat transfer, may be the basis for its inclusion in a process. Yet, mechanistic and quantitative descriptions of the mixing process remain incomplete (7-9). Nonetheless, enough fundamental and empirical data are available to allow some reasonable predictions to be made. 

A quantitative understanding of certain primary combustion phenomena, e.g., liquid fuel-droplet vaporization and burning, gas phase chemical reaction kinetics, radiation heat transfer from combustion products, and mixing of reactants and combustion products, is required to develop a rational approach for the effective utilization of synfuels in industrial boiler/furnace systems. Those processes are defined by the interaction of a number of mechanisms which are conveniently described in terms of physical and chemical related processes. The physical processes are ... 

The reaction mechanism of this system involved the transfer of phases across the solid liquid interface. Hence, quantification using Equation (22) produced values that were overestimated. To determine the absolute phase abundances, powdered diamond was selected as an inert internal standard and was weighed into the starting solids. Acid was then added to this mixture and the standard concentration taken as its weight fraction of the sample in its entirety, i.e., solids and liquids in total. For each dataset the results of the quantitative phase analysis were adjusted according to the known amount of standard present in the system [Equation (16)]. This allowed the determination of variation in the amorphous content of the system to be assessed via Equation (17)] as well as the formation and consumption of crystalline phases. The amorphous content... 

Only for reactions that are usually homogeneously catalyzed in the liquid phase, and carried out in the absence of a second or even third phase, i.e., a gas or an immiscible liquid, are the procedures known required for kinetic analysis (e.g. [17— 20]). In two-phase systems in which the catalytic reaction takes place in the liquid phase between a liquid reactant and gaseous reactants the quantitative analysis can be more complicated because the gaseous reactions have to be transferred over the gas-liquid boundary layer into the liquid phase. In this situation the reaction engineering prediction of the reactor performance can be performed easily as long as the rate of transfer of the gasous reactants into the liquid phase is fast compared with the intrinsic catalytic reaction according to Eq. (1) [21]. 

The crystal growth in a supersaturated solution at a constant concentration driving force depends on the viscosity, the density of the solution, the reiative rate between the surface of the crystal and the solution, the diffusivity of the solute in the liquid and the crystal diameter (3). The quantitative relationship between ail parameters can be expressed by the Chilton-Coburn relation, well-known for mass-transfer in heterogeneous catalysis (26). In a treatment by Amelinckx (27), the surface reaction, i.e. the integration of matter in the crystal lattice has been considered to be next to diffusion, the second resistance to crystallization. 

---