Quality Control Runs

Another series of runs were done to determine the effect of the NblZr cladding on the neutronics of the system. One of the reasons for doing these runs was the possibility that NblZr might end up being incompatible with the UN fuel and there was a desire to 

---

At Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd., invasive breast cancer tissue controls, demonstrating HER2 expression levels at 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0, are incorporated into all Oracle HER2 Bond IHC System cell line quality control runs. This ensures that control cell lines are validated as a viable assay control. The evaluation of control cell lines should always be performed within the context of appropriate tolerance limits. Subtle changes from batch to batch may occur, and it is the correct evaluation of the cell line staining patterns within appropriate tolerance limits that enables control cell lines to be utilized both in a commercial setting and as an EQA monitoring device. 

For quality control, run about 5 pL diluted with 90 pL of 0.05% CH3COOH-NH3 on an analytical reverse-phase column. 

Quality control Run quality control samples (commercial kit supplied or spiked sample matrix) as part of precision testing during validation. This data can be used to confirm and/or establish QC ranges that will be used to monitor the assay when used on toxicology studies Mean 2SD/3SD or 20% nominal (expected) values... 

Figure 16-3 Quality Control Run Chart (Melt Flow Rate)...

Quality Control—Run a suitable analytical quality control sample several times daily. When the observed value lies between acceptable limits on a quality control chart, proceed with sample determinations. 

Quality control elements required by the instrumental analyzer method include analyzer calibration error ( 2 percent of instrument span allowed) verifying the absence of bias introduced by the sampling system (less than 5 percent of span for zero and upscale cah-bration gases) verification of zero and cahbration drift over the test period (less than 3 percent of span of the period of each run). 

The method was validated in accordance to the guidelines of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Data with respect to accuracy, within- and between run precision, recovery, detection and quantitation limits were reported and found to be within the accepted international criteria. Neither endogeneous substances nor the commonly used dmgs were found to interfere with the retention times of the analytes. Standard solutions of the dmg and quality control preparations at high and low level concentrations were demonstrated to be stable at room temperature and/or -20°C for long and short periods of time. 

FIGURE 11.22 Control charts and outliers, (a) pEC50 values (ordinates) run as a quality control for a drug screen over the days on which the screen is run (abscissae). Dotted lines are the 95% c.l. and the solid lines the 99.7% c.l. Data points that drift beyond the action lines indicate significant concern over the quality of the data obtained from the screen on those days, (b) The effect of significant outliers on the criteria for rejection. For the data set shown, the inclusion of points A and B lead to a c.l. for 95% confidence that includes point B. Removal of point A causes the 95% limits to fall below points B, causing them to be suspect as well. Thus, the presence of the data to be possibly rejected affects the criteria for rejection of other data. 

The Production Department was not amused, because lower values had been expected. Quality Control was blamed for using an insensitive, unse-lective, and imprecise test, and thereby unnecessarily frightening top management. This outcome had been anticipated, and a better method, namely polarography, was already being set up. The same samples were run, this time in duplicate, with much the same results. A relative confidence interval of 25% was assumed. Because of increased specificity, there were now less doubts as to the amounts of this particular heavy metal that were actually present. To rule out artifacts, the four samples were sent to outside laboratories to do repeat tests with different methods X-ray fluorescence (XRFi °) and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). The confidence limits were determined to be 10% resp. 3%. Figure 4.23 summarizes the results. Because each method has its own specificity pattern, and is subject to intrinsic artifacts, a direct statistical comparison cannot be performed without first correcting the apparent concentrations in order to obtain presumably true... 

A quality control laboratory had a certain model of HPLC in operation. One of the products that was routinely run on the instrument contained two compounds, A and B, that were quantitated in one run at the same detector wavelength setting. At an injection volume of 20 /tL, both compounds showed linear response. The relatively low absorption for compound B resulted in an uncertainty that was just tolerable, but an improvement was sought. 

A manufacturing company approached the cost of quality control in a realistic manner. Before a quotation was made for a new product, the control chemist submitted an estimate of the time required for running the necessary tests. An hourly charge was established for laboratory operation, and the cost of quality control could thus be established. The sales department did not like the arrangement because the cost was very much the same whether they sold 200 or 2000 gallons of a product. 

High quality is one of the criteria defined in the requirements section above. Since the program should run automatically in batch mode, we mean by quality control an internal check of the 3D structures produced by the structure generator itself. In general, the abilities of a fast, automatic structure builder to assess the quaUty of its models are rather limited since, for example, an exhaustive conformation analysis and energy optimization is impossible in most cases. However, there are a Umited number of simple quaUty checks to avoid trivially distorted structures ... 

Analytical Quality Control Services (1998) AQCS Intercomparison Runs Reference Materials 1998-1999. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. 

It must be remarked that terminology is not consistent and there are many widely used synon)ms. Quality control in this Chapter refers to practices best described as internal quality control. Quahty assessment is often referred to as external quality control, proficiency testing, interlaboratory comparisons, round robins or other terms. Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assessment are preferred because they best describe the objectives for which the RMs are being used, i.e. the immediate and active control of the results being reported from an analytical run or event, and an objective, retrospective assessment of the quality of those results. 

John Howe, an analyst in the laboratory of MDS Pharma Services in Lincoln, Nebraska, checks an auto-sampler tray used with an HPLC instrument in the analysis of biological samples for drugs. A given run may include a large number of sample extracts to run alongside quality controls and standards, hence the need for an auto-sampler. 

The guidelines stress, however, that internal quality control is not foolproof even when properly executed. Obviously it is subject to errors of both kinds , i.e. runs that are in control will occasionally be rejected and runs that are out of control occasionally accepted. Of more importance, IQC cannot usually identify sporadic gross errors or short-term disturbances in the analytical system that affect the results for individual test materials. Moreover, inferences based on IQC results are applicable only to test materials that fall within the scope of the analytical method validation. Despite these limitations, which professional experience and diligence can alleviate to a degree, internal quality control is the principal recourse available for ensuring that only data of appropriate quality are released from a laboratory. When properly executed it is very successful. 

Independent of existing intra-lot variability, a sample size of six dosage units is generally recognized to suffice the needs of quality control (QC). In very early development less than six specimens may be used to create data, but as soon as possible tests should be run with at least n = 6. It is advisable to create statistically valid and sound data for manufacturing prototypes even at very early phases of development, in order to be able to identify formulations/batches with unwanted dissolution behavior. In the early phases of a drug product s development, formulations may not be of acceptable stability. This means that stability phenomena may mask... 

---