Pyrethroids toxicity site

The molecular basis for the evolution of distinct kdr mutations in different insects and arachnids remains unclear. Assuming that the pyrethroid binding site(s) (and/or the pyrethroid response domain) is composed of multiple amino acid residues, there are two ways by which different mutations can be selected in different insects and arachnids. First, the random mutation hypothesis mutation in any pyrethroid binding site/response domain affects pyrethroid toxicity without impacting normal sodium channel functional properties. Thus, selection of different mutations in different insects and arachnids is purely random. Second, the nonrandom mutation hypothesis mutation in any pyrethroid binding site/response domain affects pyrethroid toxicity, but some mutations also drastically alter normal sodium channel functional properties in one species, but not in another, presumably because of different sodium channel backbone sequences. That is, there may be severe fimess costs for some mutations, if placed out of their native protein context. 

Mechanism of action can be an important factor determining selectivity. In the extreme case, one group of organisms has a site of action that is not present in another group. Thus, most of the insecticides that are neurotoxic have very little phytotoxicity indeed, some of them (e.g., the OPs dimethoate, disyston, and demeton-5 -methyl) are good systemic insecticides. Most herbicides that act upon photosynthesis (e.g., triaz-ines and substituted ureas) have very low toxicity to animals (Table 2.7). The resistance of certain strains of insects to insecticides is due to their possessing a mutant form of the site of action, which is insensitive to the pesticide. Examples include certain strains of housefly with knockdown resistance (mutant form of Na+ channel that is insensitive to DDT and pyrethroids) and strains of several species of insects that are resistant to OPs because they have mutant forms of acetylcholinesterase. These... 

Pyrethroids, such as p,p -DDT, are toxic because they interact with Na+ channels of the axonal membrane, thereby disturbing the transmission of nerve action potential (Eldefrawi and Eldefrawi 1990, and Chapter 5, Section 5.2.4 of this book). In both cases, marked hydrophobicity leads to bioconcentration of the insecticides in the axonal membrane and reversible association with the Na+ channel. Consequently, both DDT and pyrethroids show negative temperature coefficients in arthropods increasing temperature brings decreasing toxicity because it favors desorption of insecticide from the site of action. 

The establishment of a common mechanism of mammalian toxicity for the pyrethroids is not a straight forward process, as it was for the organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides, due to the occurrence of multiple potential target sites and the varied action of pyrethroids at these sites as reviewed above. In view of... 

Pyrethroids have low oral toxicity to mammals, and in general their insect (topical) to mammal (oral) toxicity ratio is much higher than that of the other major classes of insecticides [25]. As the reason, at least the following mechanisms are conceivable (1) negative temperature dependence - differences in body temperature between insects and mammals makes the insect nerves much more sensitive, (2) metabolic rate - insects metabolize the insecticide more slowly than mammals, and the metabolizing enzyme systems are different, and (3) differences in body size - insects will have less chance to metabolize the insecticides before reaching the target site [26]. 

The relative sensitivity of insects to pyrethrins and pyrethroids is attributable (in roughly equal proportions) to their slower metabolic disposal, to their lower body temperature, and to the inherently higher sensitivity of their target sites. Although there are few, if any, toxic actions of the pyrethroids in insects that do not have their counterpart in man, these three quantitative factors combine to give insect-mammalian toxicity ratios of 2 or 3 orders of magnitude. 

The toxic effects of some pesticide mixtures are additive, particularly when their toxic mechanisms are identical. The additive effects of the organophosphates chlorpyrifos and diazanon were demonstrated in one study. T Another study found the s-triazine herbicides atrazine and cyanazine to show additive toxic effects. Not all mixtures of similar pesticides produce additive effects, however. In one study, mixtures of five organophos-phate pesticides (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, dimethoate, acephate, and malathion) were shown to produce greater than additive effects when administered to laboratory animals. Another article discusses nonsimple additive effects of pyrethroid mixtures. Despite the similarities in their chemical structure, pyrethroids act on multiple sites, and mixtures of these produce different toxic effects. 10 ... 

Fore recently a comparable enhanced inhibition in resistant strains has been observed with aryloxadiazolone anticholinesterases (38). A second promising example is the discovery that some natural and synthetic isobutylamides are selectively toxic against houseflies that carry the super-kdr resistance trait (39). This gene causes an alteration in the sensitivity of the site of action for DDT and pyrethroids and is a major threat to the continued efficacy of synthetic pyrethroids in many of their applications. 

Pyrethroid insecticides (deltamethrin, NRDC 157, cismethrin), DDT analogs ( p,j> -DDT, (>,j> -DDT, methoxychlor, EDO), and a DDT-pyrethroid hybrid compound (GH401) enhanced veratridine-dependent sodium uptake by mouse brain synaptosomes The effectiveness of these compounds in the sodium uptake assay was in good agreement with their acute mammalian toxicities. , -DDT also enhanced veratridine-dependent sodium uptake by fish brain synaptosomes These findings demonstrate the utility of ion flux assays to study interactions of insecticides with sodium channels in the central nervous system and to explore species differences in insecticide target site sensitivity ... 

Our preliminary results with fish brain preparations suggest that ion flux techniques may be valuable in studies of target site differences between species. We have demonstrated veratridine-stimulated, tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium uptake in a vesicular preparation from fish brain, thus confirming the presence of functional sodium channels in this preparation. Our results with , -DDT in this system also agree well with the action of DDT analogs and pyrethroids in mouse brain assays. Further studies wih both preparations should allow the exploration of target site differences between mammals and fish that have been inferred from whole animal toxicity studies. 

---