Potentiostatic measurements

Corrosion and Emnronmenbd Degradation, M. Schutze, editor, Vol. 1, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000, pp. 1-66.) 

---

Potentiostatic measurements are analogous to heat-transfer experiments in which the wall temperature is controlled, whereas galvanostatic measurements are similar in character to those in which the heat flux is controlled. However, whereas heat transfer may be measured readily with a uniform flux generated at the surface, there is no assurance that a known current applied to an extended electrode will yield a uniform current distribution over the surface, unless the surface is divided into electrically insulated segments and identical current densities are imposed externally on these... 

As mentioned earlier, the pitting potential is sensitive to several experimental parameters. The influence of some of these parameters on the potentiostatically measured potential-independent CPT was examined by Arnvig and Bisgaard. ... 

Figure 6.21. Schematic diagram of apparatus for potentiostatic measurements E, controlled potential ei, test electrode e2, reference electrode e3 counter (auxiliary)-electrode.

This is the general name for electrochemical rate measurements in which the rate varies with time on the way to achieving the final steady-state rate. Potentiostatic measurements are also called potential step, and galvanostatic measurements current step, measurements. 

Further Observations on the Technique of Steady-State Electrochemical Kinetic Measurements 1. In potentiostatic measurements, the appropriate interval of potential between each measurement depends on the total range of potential variation. It may be between 10 and 50 mV and can be automated and computer controlled (Buck and Kang, 1994). It is helpful to observe a series of steady-state currents at, say, 20 potentials taken from least cathodic to most cathodic, and the same series taken from most cathodic to the least cathodic. The two sets of current densities should be equal at each of the chosen constant potentials. In practice, with reactions involving electrocatalysis, a degree of disagreement up to 25% in the current density at constant potential is to be tolerated. 

Instrument limitations must be considered in the measurement of organic coatings because their resistivities are large, 1012 Q cm or more. The input resistance of common potentiostats is usually not more than 10n to 1012 ohms, and if the cell resistance approaches or exceeds the input resistance of the potenti-ostat, a significant fraction of the applied signal will pass across the input impedance and not the cell impedance. In these cases the collected data do not reflect just the impedance of the electrochemical interface, which is a fundamental assumption in almost all data analyses. In fact, the potentiostat input impedance in parallel with the stray capacitance associated with the potentiostat measuring leads will be obtained. 

Four-electrode system — For electrochemical measurements with the -> interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (or the oil/water interface), the four-electrode system is used. In potentiostatic measurements such as cyclic voltammetry, two reference elec-... 

Even though galvanostatic and potentiostatic measurements may yield the same results in many cases, it is important to understand the inherent difference between them and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each. 

Potentiostats did not become commercially available until the late 1950s. Most earlier work was conducted either galvanostatically or potentiostatically, but with a two-electrode cell, in which one electrode served as both counter and reference electrode. Because of their complexity, potentiostats tend to have slower response times than galvanostats. It should be pointed out, though, that some of the limitations of potentiostats alluded to above are a matter of the past. With present day (1993) electronic components, it is possible to build home-made potentiostats, or to purchase commercial units, that make use of all the inherent advantages of potentiostatic measurements with little instrumental limitation, or none. 

It is important to realize that, although the potential that is applied in a potentiostatic measurement (or being measured in a galvano-static measurement) is between the points A and C in Fig. 5D, the potential driving the charge-transfer process is that between the points B and C. The difference between them is... 

This is an easy correction to make in galvanostatic measurements or in steady-state potentiostatic measurements, but the situation is much more complex when the controlled potential is changed with time. 

The choice between galvanostatic and potentiostatic measurements depends on circumstances. From the instrumentation point of view, galvanostats are much simpler than potentiostats. This is not only a matter of cost, but also a matter of performance. Thus, where it is desired to measure very low currents (e.g., on single microelectrodes), a battery with a variable resistor may be all that is needed to set up a low-noise galvanostat. At the other extreme, when large currents must be passed — for instance, in an industrial pilot plant for electrosynthesis - power supplies delivering controllable currents in the range of hundreds of amperes are readily available, whereas potentiostats of comparable output are either nonexistent or extremely expensive. 

In this study we applied these diagnostic criterion to evaluate whether the oxide films on tungsten are anion conducting in oxidizer solutions. As expected from the potentiodynamic polarization experiments, which show a constant current passivation regime, the steady state current density was found to be independent of potential in passive region using potentiostatic measurements. 

Lorenz et al. [3.92-3.94, 3.98, 3.101] demonstrated that potentiostatically measured non-monotonous current transients represent a necessary, but not a sufficient criterion for 2D nucleation and growth. For example, such transients observed in the systems Ag(lll)/Pb, H, CIO4 and Ag(lll)/TT, If, S04 were quantitatively explained by Mefj g charge transfer and bulk diffusion as rate determining steps as illustrated in Fig. 3.48 [3.92, 3.93]. 

Kolb et al. [3.155, 3.224, 3.225] studied experimentally the system Au(lll)/Cu, H, so/. Along with observed discontinuous-like q E) isotherms (Fig. 3.50), non-monotonous current transients were potentiostatically measured (Fig. 3.51). These findings were explained in terms of first order phase transitions related to the peaks in the cyclic voltammograms. 

Fig. 4.3 A potentiostatic measuring system WE, working electrode RE. reference electrode CE, counter electrode...

D.M. Hewette, Pitting of Austenitic Stainless Steel, the Electrochemical Basis and Validity of Potentiostatic Measurements, master s thesis, University of Tennessee Library, Knoxville, TN, 1978... 

The complexity of chemical tests causes less reliable results. Therefore, the critical potentials determined by potentiostatic measurements are usually accepted as the most rehable results, which may be used as a criterion for the ranking of the corrosion properties of metals. Inhibition potentials are usually of less importance due to the relatively negative rest potentials of the... 

At first, the relation of the emf E of this cell and the stoichiometric composition of the wustite sample was measured by coulometric titration. Then galvanostatic or potentiostatic measurements of the relaxation curves for oxidation or reduction of the wustite samples were obtained and the chemical diffusivities determined. The values are consistent with those obtained from tracer diffusion measurements, considering thermodynamic and correlation factors. As already mentioned, surface compositions of wustite were also measured by AES, using an electrochemical cell to establish the oxygen activities [28]... 

In a PEC system, IPCE is usually obtained from a chronoamperometry (potentiostatic) measurement. In this system, a bias can be applied between the sample/working electrode versus a counter electrode (2-electrode experiment) or a reference electrode (3-electrode experiment) while measuring the current that arises from subjecting the PEC electrode to monochromatic light at various wavelengths. The difference between the steady state current under monochromatic illumination... 

Pseudo reference electrodes are electrodes that are used as reference electrodes, especially in three-electrode potentiostatic measurements, but do not possess the properties of real reference electrodes, i.e. they are not non-polarisable, they do not possess a thermodynamically calculable potential and they do not have a potential, which is independent of the electrolyte in the cell. Nevertheless, such electrodes, normally simple metal wires of platinum or gold, can be used provided that the potential scale is calibrated with an inner standard. A somewhat worse alternative is to measure the potential of the pseudo reference electrode versus a conventional reference electrode in a separate experiment. This is reliable only when one can be sure that the potential of the pseudo reference electrode is the same in the calibration and the application experiment. Since the pseudo reference electrode is directly... 

A standard potential vs. pH diagram correlates the thermodynamics of the aquocobalamin (4+)-Bi2r (23)-Bi2s (40") system (see Fig. 5). The interconversion between the different oxidation states of B -derivatives can usually be monitored effectively by UV-vis spectroscopy, and the relevant data were obtained from potentiostatic measurements, which were followed by UV-vis spectroscopy [90,94], Within the pH range - 1 to 11 and applied potentials = 0.5 V and -1.2 V vs. SCE, seven solution cobalamins are thermodynamically predominant spanning a range of the three formal oxidation states of Bi2 [90]. 

---