Pitting potential

Gold oxidation starts at electrode potentials > -t-1200 mV vs. AI/AICI3, first at the steps between different terraces. At higher potentials pits are formed, rapidly resulting in complete disintegration of the substrate. 

Considering the similarity between Figs. 1 and 2, the electrode potential E and the anodic dissolution current J in Fig. 2 correspond to the control parameter ft and the physical variable x in Fig. 1, respectively. Then it can be said that the equilibrium solution of J changes the value from J - 0 to J > 0 at the critical pitting potential pit. Therefore the critical pitting potential corresponds to the bifurcation point. From these points of view, corrosion should be classified as one of the nonequilibrium and nonlinear phenomena in complex systems, similar to other phenomena such as chaos. 

At the area between the breakdown potential Eb and the critical pitting potential pit local film breakdown occurs, which leads to the creation of pit nuclei. However, these nuclei are immediately repassivated. Consequently, in this potential region it is concluded that breakdown and repair are continuously repeated without creating pit growth. 

Fig. 1. Polarization curve of metals with active, passive and (a) transpassive potential range including oxygen evolution (b) passive potential range going directly to oxygen evolution (c) continuing passivity for valve metals to very positive potentials. Pitting between critical pitting lim and inhibition potential fsj in the presence of aggressive anions and inhibitors.

We will begin by reviewing methods of temperature measurement, furnace design, and temperature control. The instruments, how they work, what they measure, potential pit-... 

Multiple regression is a fairly complex subject with a number of potential pit-falls. This section is really only meant to give a taste of what it does. If you want to use it yourself, it would probably be a good idea to get some advice from a competent statistician. 

The Michaelis-Menten Formalism has been remarkably successful in elucidating the mechanisms of isolated reactions in the test tube. There are numerous treatments of this use of kinetics, and many of these provide a thoughtful critique of the potential pit falls. In short, reliable results can be obtained with steady-state methods if one is careful to follow the canons and if one remembers that several mechanisms may yield the same kinetic behavior. Isotope exchange, pre-steady state, and other transient or relaxation kinetic techniques, as well as various chemical and physical methods, also have been applied in conjunction with steady-state kinetic methods to dissect the elementary reactions within an enzyme-catalyzed reaction and to distinguish between various models (e.g., see Cleland, 1970 Kirschner, 1971 Segel, 1975 Hammes, 1982 Fersht, 1985). 

FIGURE 22.28 Schematic polarization diagrams for the repassivation of pitting dissolution of metals Er = repassivation potential, /-pit — pit radius, /pit = pitting dissolution current, and /a — metal dissolution current in the active sate. 

FIGURE 22.29 Schematic polarization diagrams (a) for the repassivation of pitting dissolution of metals and (b) for transformation from the electropolishing mode of pitting to the active mode of localized dissolution EP = passivation potential in the solution bulk, p = passivation potential in the critical pit solution, /sR = pit repassivation potential, /pit = pitting dissolution current, /a = anodic metal dissolution current in the active state in the bulk solution, and / = anodic metal dissolution current in the critical pit solution. 

Graphically AH is represented by the depth of the potential pit (minus the zero energy) on the potential curve (Fig. 40). The energy factors... 

Figure 19. A simple ion energy profile in a channel with two potential pits.

In more general situations, when a channel has to be characterized by a chain of three of four potential pits the number of differential equations such as Eq. (109) increases sharply. They are solved either through the graphic procedure suggested by Hill or with the help of a computer. In the next section the application of the above rationale will be exemplified for the sodium and potassium channels of natural membranes. 

The structure of these expressions suggests that in the case given by Eq. (119) the populations of the potential pits are not correlated. For example, P(A, B) = 6162, where 61, are the equilibrium populations of ions A and B in the left and right-hand pits, respectively. Using the solutions (120), (121) and the definitions of the fluxes [Eq. (117)], we get ... 

The sticking of droplets indicates a droplet-waU atfraction and the existence of a secondary potential pit as fliat for the droplet-droplet atfraction in a doublet The droplet concentration within flic pit is proportional to the concentration on its boundary. The latter decreases with a decrease in the density contrast. 

The electrostatic barrier between the potential pit and the wall retards the rate of sticking. The lower flie droplet flux through this barrier, the lower is the potential pit occupancy by droplets. Thus, an essential decrease in the rate of sticking is possible with decreasing density contrast. 

The forces of intermolecular interactions are the superposition of the dipole, induction, and disperse interaction forces. They can be expressed as a united function of interactions, such as the sum of two power functions Equation 1.7-39 (the Lennard-Johns potential), the potential pit, etc. 

---