Galvanostatic measurements

4 Rotating Disc Electrodes (RDEs) and Rotating Ring Disc Electrodes (RRDEs) 

CO = 2nf,fis the rotational frequency v = v /p with the viscosity of the solution v and its density p D is the diffusion coefficient 

For aqueous electrolytes with v = 10 cm s , co = 63 s, and D = 5 x 10 cm s as a typical value for ions in water, one obtains d j = 1.6 x 10 cm. With Equation 1.119, one gets for the diffusion-limited current density z d = -nCDc /d = - 300 pA cm for a bulk concentration Cg = 10 M and n = 1 for the number of exchanged electrons. Increase of the rotation frequency/will decrease dj with according to Equation 1.129 and increase t/, accordingly. Similar results hold for anodic metal dissolution and the maximum current density ip, which is limited by the precipitation of a salt film. 

A RRDE has a concentric ring around a disc electrode, which may be used to analyze the products formed at the disc. The radial flow of the electrolyte parallel to the electrode surface allows a diffusion-limited analytical ring current /r for an appropriate setting 

Cross-section of an RDE and the electrolyte flow in front of its surface. (From Strehblow, Phenomenological and electro- 

---

The simplest of the methods employing controlled current density is electrolysis at constant current density, in which the E-t dependence is measured (the galvanostatic or chronopotentiometric method). The instrumentation for this method is much less involved than for controlled-potential methods. The basic experimental arrangement for galvanostatic measurements is shown in Fig. 5.15, where a recording voltmeter or oscilloscope replaces the potentiometer. The theory of the simplest applications of this method to electrode processes was described in Section 5.4.1 (see Eqs 5.4.16 and 5.4.17). 

Potentiostatic measurements are analogous to heat-transfer experiments in which the wall temperature is controlled, whereas galvanostatic measurements are similar in character to those in which the heat flux is controlled. However, whereas heat transfer may be measured readily with a uniform flux generated at the surface, there is no assurance that a known current applied to an extended electrode will yield a uniform current distribution over the surface, unless the surface is divided into electrically insulated segments and identical current densities are imposed externally on these... 

FIGURE 4.10 Current-time traces (top) and potential-time traces (bottom) for the pulsed galvanostatic measurement of lOmg l-1 protamine in aqueous sample containing 0.1 M NaCl and 50mM TRIS (pH 7.40) [54]. An applied cathodic current of — 3 pA leads to the extraction of protamine into the membrane, and the observed potential is significantly different for samples with and without protamine (bottom). The membrane is renewed potentiostatically at 0 V for 10 sec before the next current pulse. 

Figure 6.17. Schematic diagram of apparatus for galvanostatic measurements P, constant current power supply e, test electrode e2, reference electrode counter (auxiliary)-electrode V, potential-time recording instrument.

Diffusion into electrodes, and potentiostatic and galvanostatic measurements, 1121 Diffusion problems, and computer simulation, 1161... 

This is the general name for electrochemical rate measurements in which the rate varies with time on the way to achieving the final steady-state rate. Potentiostatic measurements are also called potential step, and galvanostatic measurements current step, measurements. 

With solid electrodes—particularly polyciystals—and less purified solutions, other changes can make the potentiostatic and galvanostatic measurement less clearly defined as to the final time at which the value of the current density at a given potential (or the final potential at a given current) should be taken. What soil of other changes are relevant here (apart from possible changes due to adsorption of impurities) ... 

Self-discharge measurement is a special case of galvanostatic measurement, recording the evolution of potential versus time at zero current, or measuring the residual capacity after some delay... 

This is an easy correction to make in galvanostatic measurements or in steady-state potentiostatic measurements, but the situation is much more complex when the controlled potential is changed with time. 

A galvanostatic measurement represents a different situation, unparalleled in chemical kinetics. Here the rate of the reaction (i.e., the current density) is controlled externally, and the potential is allowed to assume a value appropriate to the rate. 

Note that the choice of T/x = 2 as the optimum time scale is specific to the coulostatic method. For galvanostatic measurements the... 

The difficulty with galvanostatic measurements with a fixed amplitude for the current perturbation is that such measurements can result in severe swings in potential, especially at low frequencies where the impedance is large. The amplitude of the potential variation associated with a perturbation of current is given by... 

Fig. 7. Equilibrium potential of the electron electrode versus concentration of solvated electrons in hexamethylphosphotriamide against a background of 0.3-0.6 M LiCI points solvated electron concentration calculated from Warburg impedance dashed line average concentration of solvated electrons, determined from galvanostatic measurements (164)...

The anodic limiting current in lithium salt solutions is determined by the diffusion of the solvated electrons to the electrode. This was quantitatively established by the measurements taken on rotating disc electrodes and also by galvanostatic measurements In fact, as seen from Fig. 8, the limiting current density is proportional to the square root of the disc electrode rotation rate. This, in accordance with the rotat-... 

Galvanostatic measurements on the C-MEMS array in a half-cell with lithium as both the counter and reference electrode [32] show a large irreversible capacity loss on first discharge followed by good cycling properties consistent with the behavior of conventional bulk coke electrodes. The lithium capacity normalized to the foot print area of the electrode array is 0.125 mAhcm". This value is nearly twice that of an unpattemed pyrolyzed film of SU-8 photoresist [32], The higher capacity is due to the greater active volume, contributed by the carbon posts over the footprint area (Fig. 2.10). 

Figure 4.4 Polarization curve with a maximum plotted from potentiostatic and galvanostatic measurements.

It is known that if passing through the oxide current is caused by a migration of ions in the electric field the index of degree B is equal -1.0. Essentially in the case of niobium coefficient B was variable from (-0.76 0.05) at 538 K to (-0.43+0.04) at 653 K. Thus we can conclude that the main reason of ri<100% at the oxidation in molten nitrates is considerable contribution of electronic current. Based on the obtained values of B it may be deduced that the share of electronic current increases with the rise in temperature. These results are in excellent agreement with the evidence from galvanostatic measurements. 

Controlled current tests for pitting are seeing increased popularity. Galvanostatic measurements involve the application of a series of small, step changes in the applied current. The potential is followed as the current is increased as described in ASTM G 100, Method for Conducting Cyclic Galvanostaircase Polarization. In some cases, more reproducible values for E p can be obtained galvanostatically in some systems, notably aluminum in inhibited water [27]. However, potential oscillations at constant current can sometimes occur, which, while of scientific interest, can make interpretation of the results difficult, as the choice of potential becomes almost arbitrary. 

---