Possibility distribution functions

Thus, Equation 27 is in this case a possible distribution function. It is of the type of the Schulz-Flory (25) distribution function. The expressions p and alternating polymerization (chain termination). The validity of the Schulz-Flory distribution function in this example of a polymerization with reversible propagation steps is evident. This type of distribution is always present if the distribution of the chain lengths... 

To calculate the actual value of the free energy, expression (3.1) must be minimized with respect to all possible distribution functions f(u). Since the function f(u) enters in the same way in Eqs. (2.3) and (3.1), the minimization procedure is performed identically in both cases. Hence, the equilibrium distribution functions f(u) for the solutions of separate rods and long chains of rods must coincide. 

In this interpretation, the possibility degree that the value of is in any given crisp set A is equal to the greatest possibility degree for all x A. That is, given a possibility distribution function rp, the associated possibility measure Pos is defined for all crisp subsets A of X via the formula... 

We are going to carry out some spatial integrations here. We suppose that tire distribution function vanishes at the surface of the container and that there is no flow of energy or momentum into or out of the container. (We mention in passing that it is possible to relax this latter condition and thereby obtain a more general fonn of the second law than we discuss here. This requires a carefiil analysis of the wall-collision temi The interested reader is referred to the article by Dorfman and van Beijeren [14]. Here, we will drop the wall operator since for the purposes of this discussion it merely ensures tliat the distribution fiinction vanishes at the surface of the container.) The first temi can be written as... 

This can be inserted in equation (02.2.3) to give tlie orientational distribution function, and tlius into equation (02.2.6) to deteniiine the orientational order parameters. These are deteniiined self-consistently by variation of tlie interaction strength iin equation (c2.2.7). As pointed out by de Gemies and Frost [20] it is possible to obtain tlie Maier-Saupe potential from a simple variational, maximum entropy metliod based on tlie lowest-order anisotropic distribution function consistent witli a nematic phase. 

The state of the surface is now best considered in terms of distribution of site energies, each of the minima of the kind indicated in Fig. 1.7 being regarded as an adsorption site. The distribution function is defined as the number of sites for which the interaction potential lies between and (rpo + d o)> various forms of this function have been proposed from time to time. One might expect the form ofto fio derivable from measurements of the change in the heat of adsorption with the amount adsorbed. In practice the situation is complicated by the interaction of the adsorbed molecules with each other to an extent depending on their mean distance of separation, and also by the fact that the exact proportion of the different crystal faces exposed is usually unknown. It is rarely possible, therefore, to formulate the distribution function for a given solid except very approximately. 

In order to calculate the distribution function must be obtained in terms of local gas properties, electric and magnetic fields, etc, by direct solution of the Boltzmann equation. One such Boltzmann equation exists for each species in the gas, resulting in the need to solve many Boltzmann equations with as many unknowns. This is not possible in practice. Instead, a number of expressions are derived, using different simplifying assumptions and with varying degrees of vaUdity. A more complete discussion can be found in Reference 34. 

The potential of mean force is a useful analytical tool that results in an effective potential that reflects the average effect of all the other degrees of freedom on the dynamic variable of interest. Equation (2) indicates that given a potential function it is possible to calculate the probabihty for all states of the system (the Boltzmann relationship). The potential of mean force procedure works in the reverse direction. Given an observed distribution of values (from the trajectory), the corresponding effective potential function can be derived. The first step in this procedure is to organize the observed values of the dynamic variable, A, into a distribution function p(A). From this distribution the effective potential or potential of mean force, W(A), is calculated from the Boltzmann relation ... 

It is possible to go beyond the SASA/PB approximation and develop better approximations to current implicit solvent representations with sophisticated statistical mechanical models based on distribution functions or integral equations (see Section V.A). An alternative intermediate approach consists in including a small number of explicit solvent molecules near the solute while the influence of the remain bulk solvent molecules is taken into account implicitly (see Section V.B). On the other hand, in some cases it is necessary to use a treatment that is markedly simpler than SASA/PB to carry out extensive conformational searches. In such situations, it possible to use empirical models that describe the entire solvation free energy on the basis of the SASA (see Section V.C). An even simpler class of approximations consists in using infonnation-based potentials constructed to mimic and reproduce the statistical trends observed in macromolecular structures (see Section V.D). Although the microscopic basis of these approximations is not yet formally linked to a statistical mechanical formulation of implicit solvent, full SASA models and empirical information-based potentials may be very effective for particular problems. 

A prior distribution for sequence profiles can be derived from mixtures of Dirichlet distributions [16,51-54]. The idea is simple Each position in a multiple alignment represents one of a limited number of possible distributions that reflect the important physical forces that determine protein structure and function. In certain core positions, we expect to get a distribution restricted to Val, He, Met, and Leu. Other core positions may include these amino acids plus the large hydrophobic aromatic amino acids Phe and Trp. There will also be positions that are completely conserved, including catalytic residues (often Lys, GIu, Asp, Arg, Ser, and other polar amino acids) and Gly and Pro residues that are important in achieving certain backbone conformations in coil regions. Cys residues that form disulfide bonds or coordinate metal ions are also usually well conserved. 

In using the normalized distribution function, it is possible to directly compare the flow performance inside different reactors. If the normalized function E(6) is used, all perfectly mixed CSTRs have numerically the same RTD. If E(t) is used, its numerical values can change for different CSTRs. 

Non-homogeneous CA. These are CA in which the state-transition rules are allowed to vary from cell to cell. The simplest such example is one where there are only two different rules randomly distributed throughout the lattice. Kauffman [kauff84] has studied the otlier extreme in whidi tlie lattice is randomly populated with all possible Boolean functions of k inputs. 

Non-Homogeneous CA a characteristic feature of all CA rules defined so far has been that of homogeneity - each cell of the system evolves according to the same rule 0. Hartman and Vichniac [hartSfi] were the first to systematically study a class of inhomogeneous CA (INCA), in which the state-transition rules are allowed to vary from cell to cell. The simplest such example is one where there are only two different 0 s, which are randomly distributed throughout the lattice. Kauffman has studied the other extreme in which the lattice is randomly populated with all 2 possible boolean functions of k inputs. The results of such studies, as well as the relationship with the dynamics of random, mappings, are covered in detail in chapter 8.3. 

In this case, each site can have many identical outputs but receives only a single input. There are four possible Boolean functions with one input two yield fixed values of 0 or 1, independent of input (these two static functions, and Fi are always among the 2 possible Boolean functions), the third inverts the input T = —) and the fourth is the identity = +). We will discuss behavior arising only ft om the latter two active functions. Exact results for the analytically tractable case of allowing a distribution of all four Boolean functions have been derived by Flyvbjerg and Kjaer [flyvb88]. 

Now let us add the possibility of collisions. Before we proceed, we make the following two assumptions (1) only binary collisions occur, i.e. we rule out situations in which three or more hard-spheres simultaneously come together (which is a physically reasonable assumption provided that the gas is sufficiently dilute), and (2) Boltzman s Stosszahlansatz, or his molecular chaos assumption that the motion of the hard-spheres is effectively pairwise uncorrelated i.e. that the pair-distribution function is the product of individual distribution functions ... 

The expressions must now be integrated over all possible values of v2, b, and e to give the net change in the number of particles of velocity vx due to collisions in time At dividing by drdvxAJ, this gives the time rate of change in the distribution function due to collisions ... 

One further point is worth mentioning at this time. The definition of a distribution function (3-5) involves the taking of a limit and, consequently, brings up the question of the existence of this limit. The limit will not, in general, exist for all possible time functions X(t), and the investigation of conditions for its existence is a legitimate mathematical problem. However, questions of this sort are quite beside the point in the present context. We are not really interested in knowing how to specify time functions in such a way that their distribution functions exist. Instead, we want to know how to specify a function Fx in such a way that it is the distribution function of... 

The notion of the distribution function of a random variable is also useful in connection with problems where it is not possible or convenient to subject the underlying function X(t) to direct measurements, but where certain derived time functions of the form Y(t) = [X(t)] are available for observation. The theorem of averages then tdls us what averages of X(t) it is possible to calculate when all that is known is the distribution function of . The answer is quite simple if / denotes (almost) apy real-valuqd function of a real variable, then all X averages of the form... 

This last step is not by far as trivial as it sounds and requires a fairly involved argument to establish it on a rigorous basis.44 Moreover, in the absence of any additional assumptions about the distribution function of the individual summands, it is not possible to conclude that the probability density function of s approaches (1/V27r)e"l2/. This subtlety is not apparent in our argument but shows up when an attempt is made to give a careful discussion of the last step in the proof. 

A random process can be (and often is) defined in terms of the random variable terminology introduced in Section 3.8. We include this alternate definition for completeness. Limiting ourselves to a single time function X( ), it is seen that X(t) is completely specified as a random process by the specification all possible finite-order joint distribution functions of the infinite set of random variables T, — oo < t < oo, defined by the equations... 

The Poisson process represents only one possible way of assigning joint distribution functions to the increments of counting functions however, in many problems, one can argue that the Poisson process is the most reasonable choice that can be made. For example, let us consider the stream of electrons flowing from cathode to plate in a vacuum tube, and let us further assume that the plate current is low enough so that the electrons do not interact with one another in the... 

There are many ways we could assign probability distribution functions to the increments N(t + sk) — N(t + tk) and simultaneously satisfy the independent increment requirement expressed by Eq. (3-237) however, if we require a few additional properties, it is possible to show that the only possible probability density assignment is the Poisson process assignment defined by Eq. (3-231). One example of such additional requirements is the following50... 

Notice that those distribution functions that satisfy Eq. (4-179) still constitute a convex set, so that optimization of the E,R curve is still straightforward by numerical methods. It is to be observed that the choice of an F(x) satisfying a constraint such as Eq. (4-179) defines an ensemble of codes the individual codes in the ensemble will not necessarily satisfy the constraint. This is unimportant practically since each digit of each code word is chosen independently over the ensemble thus it is most unlikely that the average power of a code will differ drastically from the average power of the ensemble. It is possible to combine the central limit theorem and the techniques used in the last two paragraphs of Section 4.7 to show that a code exists for which each code word satisfies... 

A plausible assumption would be to suppose that the molecular coil starts to deform only if the fluid strain rate (s) is higher than the critical strain rate for the coil-to-stretch transition (ecs). From the strain rate distribution function (Fig. 59), it is possible to calculate the maximum strain (kmax) accumulated by the polymer coil in case of an affine deformation with the fluid element (efl = vsc/vcs v0/vcs). The values obtained at the onset of degradation at v0 35 m - s-1, actually go in a direction opposite to expectation. With the abrupt contraction configuration, kmax decreases from 19 with r0 = 0.0175 cm to 8.7 with r0 = 0.050 cm. Values of kmax are even lower with the conical nozzles (r0 = 0.025 cm), varying from 3.3 with the 14° inlet to a mere 1.6 with the 5° inlet. In any case, the values obtained are lower than the maximum stretch ratio for the 106 PS which is 40. It is then physically impossible for the chains to become fully stretched in this type of flow. 

---