Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction strength

This can be inserted in equation (02.2.3) to give tlie orientational distribution function, and tlius into equation (02.2.6) to deteniiine the orientational order parameters. These are deteniiined self-consistently by variation of tlie interaction strength iin equation (c2.2.7). As pointed out by de Gemies and Frost [20] it is possible to obtain tlie Maier-Saupe potential from a simple variational, maximum entropy metliod based on tlie lowest-order anisotropic distribution function consistent witli a nematic phase. [Pg.2556]

Vdl W (64XT P7V d) exp( — f) where y is a factor of order unity for highly dissociated ionic surfactants (4). In practice, the interaction strength may... [Pg.427]

The value of F,2 then depends on the various engineering strengths plus the biaxial tensile failure stress, a. Tsai and Wu also discuss the use of off-axis uniaxial tests to determine the interaction strengths such as F.,2 [2-26]. [Pg.116]

Freezing is a very general phenomenon. Upon increasing the interaction strength or increasing the density, colloidal suspensions undergo phase... [Pg.757]

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) Interaction strength (molar dissociation constant, K ). One member of the reacting pair needs to be immobilised onto an inert surface. Not suitable for selfassociation analysis. [7]... [Pg.213]

At finite velocity kinetic friction behaves quite differently in the sense that the commensurability plays a less significant role. Besides, the system shows rich dynamic properties since Eq (16) may lead to periodic, quasi-periodic, or chaotic solutions, depending on damping coefficient y and interaction strength h. Based on numerical results of an incommensurate case [18,19], we outline a force curve of F in Fig. 23 asafunction ofv, in hopes of gaining a better understanding of dynamic behavior in the F-K model. [Pg.177]

Examples of Irregular Contribution to Interaction Strength for Polyolefin Blends... [Pg.304]

As we discussed in the previous section, the primary parameter that determines the interaction strength between an adsorbate and a (transition) metal surface is the coordinative unsaturation of the surface metal atoms. The lower the coordination number of a surface atom, the larger the interaction with interacting adsorbates. [Pg.23]

Figure 6.8. Summary of molecular orbital theory for homonuclear molecules. Note how the stability of a chemical bond depends both on the interaction strength and the filling of the orbitals. Figure 6.8. Summary of molecular orbital theory for homonuclear molecules. Note how the stability of a chemical bond depends both on the interaction strength and the filling of the orbitals.
Identification of such universal relations between activation energies and heats of adsorption for particular classes of reaction can be seen as a more precise and more quantitative formulation of Sabatier s Principle. It is promising tool in the search for new materials on the basis of optimized interaction strength between relevant intermediates and the surface. [Pg.265]

The nucleation behavior of transition metal particles is determined by the ratio between the thermal energy of the diffusing atoms and the interaction of the metal atoms at the various nucleation sites. To create very small particles or even single atoms, low temperatures and metal exposures have to be used. The metal was deposited as metal atoms impinging on the surface. The metal exposure is given as the thickness (in monolayer ML) of a hypothetical, uniform, close-packed metal layer. The interaction strength of the metals discussed here was found to rise in the series from Pd < Rh < Co ( Ir) < V [17,32]. Whereas Pd and Rh nucleate preferentially at line defects at 300 K and decorate the point defects at 90 K, point defects are the predominant nucleation center for Co and V at 300 K. At 60 K, Rh nucleates at surface sites between point defects [16,33]. [Pg.120]

Fig. 4.20 A schematic view of the ground state terms of a transition metal ion with 3d electron configuration and spin S = 5/2, such as in high-spin iron(III), under various perturbations with decreasing interaction strength from left to right... Fig. 4.20 A schematic view of the ground state terms of a transition metal ion with 3d electron configuration and spin S = 5/2, such as in high-spin iron(III), under various perturbations with decreasing interaction strength from left to right...
From these monomer properties alone it is not quite clear how the trends in the interaction strength with a fixed given acceptor B will develop. For the X2 molecules the polarizabilities rise in the series F2, CI2, and Br2. The dipole moments of the interhalogens XY decrease in the series C1F, BrF, and BrCl, whereas the polarizabilities increase in this series. [Pg.17]

During the p decay process, there exists anapole moment along the spin axis of the parent nuclei [1]. The anapole moment presents a new kind of dipole moment which is invariant under time reversal and odd under parity. A pseudoscalar p( V x H. ct) exists between the anapole moment and the spin of the emitted electrons, where p is the interaction strength. This interaction breaks parity conservation. [Pg.312]

The affinity (interaction strength), multiple interactions, and the changes in concentration can be also monitored from those studies. To deliver data in real time, the natural phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is employed. Since the refractive index (r ) at the interface changes as molecules are immobilized on the sensor surface, instant measure of r provides real-time assessment. The Tlcxchip platform exploits grating-coupled SPR (GC-SPR) for this purpose. [Pg.235]


See other pages where Interaction strength is mentioned: [Pg.1504]    [Pg.1514]    [Pg.1514]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.241]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.114 , Pg.115 , Pg.116 , Pg.117 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.53 ]




SEARCH



Acid-base interactions measurement strength distribution

Box interaction strength approximation

Dependence of Multiphonon Transitions on Interaction Strength and Temperature

Donor-acceptor interaction relative strengths

Electrostatic interaction relative strengths

Enthalpy interaction, strength

HOMO-LUMO interaction strength

Interaction field strength

Interaction potentials strength

Intermolecular interaction forces,relative strengths

Intermolecular interaction strength

Ionic strength on the interaction

Liquid-solid interactions strength

Lone-Pair Interaction Excessive Elasticity and Mechanical Strength

Noncovalent interactions strength

Nucleotides interaction strength

Orbital interactions strength

Protein electrostatic interactions, bond strength

Quantitative determination of acid-base interaction strength

Solvent interaction, nature strength

Strength of Orbital Interactions

Strength of interaction

Strength of the Interaction

Structures and Strengths ofM-H-C Interaction

The Electronic Interaction Strength

The Strengths of Functional Group Contributions to Drug-Receptor Interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info