Physical reality models

TTie calculation of partial fugacltles requires knowing the derivatives of thermodynamic quantities with respect to the compositions and to arrive at a mathematical model reflecting physical reality. 

Throughout this book we have emphasized fundamental concepts, and looking at the statistical basis for the phenomena we consider is the way this point of view is maintained in this chapter. All theories are based on models which only approximate the physical reality. To the extent that a model is successful, however, it represents at least some features of the actual system in a manageable way. This makes the study of such models valuable, even if the fully developed theory falls short of perfect success in quantitatively describing nature. 

The problems involved in finding random process models for particular sources and channels are, of course, very difficult. Such models can hardly ever be more than crude approximations to physical reality. Even the simplest random process model, however, makes it possible to consider a class of inputs rather than a single input and to consider the frequency with which the inputs are used. 

The beauty of finite-element modelling is that it is very flexible. The system of interest may be continuous, as in a fluid, or it may comprise separate, discrete components, such as the pieces of metal in this example. The basic principle of finite-element modelling, to simulate the operation of a system by deriving equations only on a local scale, mimics the physical reality by which interactions within most systems are the result of a large number of localised interactions between adjacent elements. These interactions are often bi-directional, in that the behaviour of each element is also affected by the system of which it forms a part. The finite-element method is particularly powerful because with the appropriate choice of elements it is easy to accurately model complex interactions in very large systems because the physical behaviour of each element has a simple mathematical description. 

The SCR catalyst is considerably more complex than, for example, the metal catalysts we discussed earlier. Also, it is very difficult to perform surface science studies on these oxide surfaces. The nature of the active sites in the SCR catalyst has been probed by temperature-programmed desorption of NO and NH3 and by in situ infrared studies. This has led to a set of kinetic parameters (Tab. 10.7) that can describe NO conversion and NH3 slip (Fig. 10.16). The model gives a good fit to the experimental data over a wide range, is based on the physical reality of the SCR catalyst and its interactions with the reacting gases and is, therefore, preferable to a simple power rate law in which catalysis happens in a black box . Nevertheless, several questions remain unanswered, such as what are the elementary steps and what do the active site looks like on the atomic scale ... 

The transparency of this model was achieved by making it possible for the user to view the equations within the model. By viewing a section of the program code, the user can know how this steady-state model mimics the physical reality. The model is intended to provide regionally specific estimates of chemical concentrations in the primary media. These estimates can be compared to monitoring data and be used for exposure estimation. 

As pointed out by Mikhail, both functional and stochastic models must be considered together at all times, as there may be several possible combinations, each representing a possible mathematical model. The functional model describes the physical events using an intelligible system, suitable for analysis. It is linked to physical realities by measurements that are themselves physical operations. In simpler situations, measurements refer directly to at least some elements of the functional model. However, it is not necessary, and often not practical, that all the elements of the model be observable. That is, from practical considerations, direct access to the system may not be possible or in some cases may be very poor, making the selection of the measurements of capital importance. 

The conclusions from this rather elementary survey of the symmetry constraint problem all point in the same general direction. The imposition of symmetry constraints (other than the Pauli principle) on a variationally-based model is either unnecessary or harmful. Far from being necessary to ensure the physical reality of the wave function, these constraints often lead to absurd results or numerical instabilities in the implementation. The spin eigenfunction constraint is only realistic when the electrons are in close proximity and in such cases comes out of the UHF calculation automatically. The imposition of molecular spatial symmetry on the AO basis is not necessary if that basis has been chosen carefully — i.e. is near optimum. Further, any breakdowns in the spatial symmetry of the AO basis are a useful indication that the basis has been chosen badly or is redundant. 

The final proof of the physical reality of our model of macromolecular adsorption was provided by simultaneous independent work, by an entirely different method, at the National Bureau of Standards (27). Stromberg et al., allowed polystyrene fractions, besides other polymers, to become adsorbed on ferrochrome plates and determined the thicknesses of the adsorbed layers... 

It should be noted that the local composition model is not consistent with the commonly accepted solvation theory. According to the solvation theory, ionic species are completely solvated by solvent molecules. In other words, the local mole fraction of solvent molecules around a central ion is unity. This becomes unrealistic when applied to high concentration electrolyte systems since the number of solvent molecules will be insufficient to completely solvate ions. With the local composition model, all ions are, effectively, completely surrounded by solvent molecules in dilute electrolyte systems and only partially surrounded by solvent molecules in high concentration electrolyte systems. Therefore, the local composition model is believed to be closer to the physical reality than the solvation theory. 

Incorrect conclusion 1 above is sometimes said to derive from the reciprocity principle, which states that light waves in any optical system all could be reversed in direction without altering any paths or intensities and remain consistent with physical reality (because Maxwell s equations are invariant under time reversal). Applying this principle here, one notes that an evanescent wave set up by a supercritical ray undergoing total internal reflection can excite a dipole with a power that decays exponentially with z. Then (by the reciprocity principle) an excited dipole should lead to a supercritical emitted beam intensity that also decays exponentially with z. Although this prediction would be true if the fluorophore were a fixed-amplitude dipole in both cases, it cannot be modeled as such in the latter case. 

As shown in Figure 16b, the 2-D rib models deal with how the existence of a solid rib affects fuel-cell performance. They do not examine the along-the-channel effects discussed above. Instead, the relevant dimensions deal with the physical reality that the gas channeFdiffusion media interfaces are not continuous. Instead, the ribs of the flow-channel plates break them. These 2-D models focus on the cathode side of the fuel-cell sandwich because oxygen and water transport there have a much more significant impact on performance. This is in contrast to the along-the-channel models that show that the underhumidification of and water transport to the anode are more important than those for the cathode. 

This review has highlighted the important effects that should be modeled. These include two-phase flow of liquid water and gas in the fuel-cell sandwich, a robust membrane model that accounts for the different membrane transport modes, nonisothermal effects, especially in the directions perpendicular to the sandwich, and multidimensional effects such as changing gas composition along the channel, among others. For any model, a balance must be struck between the complexity required to describe the physical reality and the additional costs of such complexity. In other words, while more complex models more accurately describe the physics of the transport processes, they are more computationally costly and may have so many unknown parameters that their results are not as meaningful. Hopefully, this review has shown and broken down for the reader the vast complexities of transport within polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and the various ways they have been and can be modeled. 

Entire texts have been devoted to discussing the range of models which may be used to describe flow-mixing processes (see, for example, refs. 21 and 40). In this section, we consider four of the most common of these models each of them is derived by modelling a fairly simple conceptual system which, with an appropriate choice of parameters, might approximate closely to a particular real system. Despite this basis, the models are often used in an empirical sense with adjustable parameters being chosen so that certain attributes of the RTD the model predicts closely match those of a real system to be described. This is irrespective of whether the conceptual model basis is a true mirror of physical reality for the system under study. 

The mathematical obfuscation of these models must not remove the requirement that every receptor model must be representative of and derivable from physical reality as represented by the source model. A statistical relationship between the variability of one observable and another is Insufficient to define cause and effect unless this physical significance can be established. 

As in the case of any spatial map, the visualisation is only an aid to navigation and need not represent reality. One of the most famous and influential maps, Harry Beck s London Underground, provides an excellent conceptual model by abandoning physical reality. It is interesting that some metaboUc pathway maps are drawn in a way that is remarkably like Beck s elegant style. 

The next two chapters jump to the middle of the 19 centuiy, a time when many chemists were using atomic models while avowing a strict agnosticism abont the physical nature or even physical reality of atoms. 

Solvation Effects. Many previous accounts of the activity coefficients have considered the connections between the solvation of ions and deviations from the DH limiting-laws in a semi-empirical manner, e.g., the Robinson and Stokes equation (3). In the interpretation of results according to our model, the parameter a also relates to the physical reality of a solvated ion, and the effects of polarization on the interionic forces are closely related to the nature of this entity from an electrostatic viewpoint. Without recourse to specific numerical results, we briefly illustrate the usefulness of the model by defining a polarizable cosphere (or primary solvation shell) as that small region within which the solvent responds to the ionic field in nonlinear manner the solvent outside responds linearly through mild Born-type interactions, described adequately with the use of the dielectric constant of the pure solvent. (Our comments here refer largely to activity coefficients in aqueous solution, and we assume complete dissociation of the solute. The polarizability of cations in some solvents, e.g., DMF and acetonitrile, follows a different sequence, and there is probably some ion-association.)... 

Experimental kinetic data are scarce for second-order transitions in inorganic compounds. They normally do not fit the simple models reflected in Eqns. (12.19) and (12.20). An experimental example is shown in Figure 12-7. It has been explained by integrating Eqn. (12.12), setting G-G° = l/2 a (T-Ttr)-t]2+ i/6-c-ti6, and by assuming a certain dependency of the rate constant yon [see M. A. Carpenter, E. Salje (1989)]. It is difficult, however, to assess the physical reality in these relations. 

The answer addresses one of the key modern engineering dilemmas, that of providing engineering judgment to evaluate calculations from black-box complex computer codes. Computer programs may provide a number that may not be a good model of physical reality. The simpler methods in this chapter are very valuable, first for intuitive understanding and second to provide both a first estimation and a check of more complex calculations. 

A mathematical model of the hydrate reservoir typically requires several minutes to days to execute and costs typically US 10-100. Even with these low costs, unless the model is based upon extensive laboratory and field data, the model will have the weakest link of the three methods to physical reality. 

The simplest definition for modeling is Uputting the physical reality into an appropriate mathematical form . 

A molecular mechanics model is not directly related to physical reality. It is best described as an as if model since we assume for example that the bonds behave as if they were springs. 

Further, it has been shown that the mathematical formulation of Kumar s model, including the condition of detachment, could not adequately describe the experimental situation—Kumars model has several fundamental weaknesses, the computational simplicity being achieved at the expense of physical reality. 

Mathematical modeling of physical processes in fuel cells inevitably involves some assumptions that may or may not be valid under all circumstances. Furthermore approximations have to be introduced to make the computational models robust and tractable. These approximations in the mathematical models lead to the so called modeling errors . That is if the equations posed are solved exactly, the difference between this exact solution and the corresponding true but usually unknown physical reality is known as the modeling error. However, it is rarely the situation that the solution to the mathematical models is exact due to the inherent numerical errors such as round off errors, iteration convergence and discretization errors, among oth-... 

Having recognized the theoretical inadequacy of the dielectric theory for polar solvents, I started to reconsider the entire problem of solvation models. Because the good performance of dielectric continuum solvation models for water cannot be a result of pure chance, in some way there must be an internal relationship between these models and the physical reality. Therefore I decided to reconsider the problem from the north pole of the globe, i.e., from the state of molecules swimming in a virtual perfect conductor. I was probably the first to enjoy this really novel perspective, and this led me to a perfectly novel, efficient, and accurate solvation model based upon, but going far beyond, the dielectric continuum solvation models such as COSMO. This COSMO for realistic solvation (COSMO-RS) model will be described in the remainder of this book. 

Computational chemistry includes applications of theoretical chemistry, but theoretical chemistry and computational chemistry are definitely not synonymous. Theoretical chemistry involves development of mathematical expressions that model physical reality as such, some of theoretical chemistry entails quantum mechanics (QM). Computational chemistry, on the other hand, involves use of computers on which theoretical and many other algorithms have been programmed. 

Molecular theories, utilizing physically reasonable but approximate molecular models, can be used to specify the stress tensor expressions in nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive equations for polymer melts. These theories, called kinetic theories of polymers, are, of course, much more complex than, say, the kinetic theory of gases. Nevertheless, like the latter, they simplify the complicated physical realities of the substances involved, and we use approximate cartoon representations of macromolecular dynamics to describe the real response of these substances. Because of the relative simplicity of the models, a number of response parameters have to be chosen by trial and error to represent the real response. Unfortunately, such parameters are material specific, and we are unable to predict or specify from them the specific values of the corresponding parameters of other... 

---