Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Small R Region

The solution to this dilemma is to recognize that the nucleus has a finite size, and that this should be accounted for. Ishikawa and coworkers showed that the use of a finite nucleus instead of a point nucleus allowed for more compact basis sets [12] and also eliminated problems with basis set balance close to the nucleus [13]. Visser et al. [14] performed a full relativistic optimization of exponents for the one-electron atoms Sn and U with and without a finite nucleus, showing that the use of a finite nuclear radius significantly decreased the maximum exponent. [Pg.274]

The exact shape and extension of the nucleus may be a matter of debate, and the preceding chapter has discussed possible models. For the derivation of basis sets, the choice is not critical, and the commonly used model is the Gaussian charge distribution [Pg.274]

The use of a finite nucleus pushes the wavefunction outwards, as was found by Visser et al. [14] However, this is a general feature, not restricted to the relativistic case. This is illustrated in the table below where the [Pg.274]


In the small-r region the kinetic equations should be tested using small lattice densities which demonstrates their correctness. [Pg.269]

In the small r region, the only difference between the = 0 and E = 0 wavefunctions with the same separation parameters is in the normalization. That is for small r... [Pg.122]

This gives us precise knowledge of g] ([Pg.300]

This expression holds true only in the large g region in reciprocal space (or small r in real space). Since... [Pg.1405]

For some rules (such as R4 and R94) the patterns obtained from single seeds are stable under the addition of further nonzero sites. For other rules (such as R218) the pattern is unstable. Although the patterns for R18 and R150 retain much of their fractal structure, some of the details appear to be washed away. A similar contrast between the evolutionary behaviors of single and small nonzero region seeded rules can be observed for the r = 2 totalistic rules shown in figures 3.7 and 3.8. [Pg.57]

Two-stage power dependence at r/ > 1.0 further implies that local small irregularity regions, i.e., the regions with high... [Pg.376]

R. M. Weis, K. Balakrishnan, B. A. Smith, and H. M. McConnell, Stimulation of fluorescence in a small contact region between rat basophil leukemia cells and planar lipid membrane targets by coherent evanescent radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 6440-6445 (1982). [Pg.338]

Bacteria contain 80 S ribose, which is synthesized of two unequal components a large 50 S subunit and small 30 S subunit. These two subunits have various functions. Messenger RNA binds with the 30 S subunit, while the 50 S subunit serves to bind amino acids, as well as to serve as the region that maintains the growing peptide chain. These regions are known as acceptor (A) and donor (R) regions, respectively, and they are located very close to one another. [Pg.467]

The distribution functions of similar and dissimilar defects also have a distinctive form. Thus, in the steady-state distribution function of dissimilar defects one observes a maximum at small distances (in the region of relative distances corresponding to the interpair correlation). On the other hand, the distribution function of similar defects in the region of small r values takes respectively on smaller values than in the case of absence of interpair correlations. This also agrees well with the analytical calculations for the continuum model [30, 31, 34] discussed in Section 7.1. [Pg.451]

In the experiments with Rydberg atoms it is very difficult to observe radiatively assisted collisions with cross sections more than a factor of 10 smaller than the resonant collision cross sections, so the deviations from Eq. (15.29) are not apparent. However, in other contexts, such as laser assisted collisions, this limitation does not apply, and it is interesting to consider how the above description passes over into the weak field regime, in which Jm(KEmv//oj) is small. If we restrict the integration in Eq. (15.27) to the large r region of space, in which the approximations we have used are valid, we can rewrite Eq. (15.27) as... [Pg.327]


See other pages where Small R Region is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.698]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.698]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.1404]    [Pg.2293]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.761]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.13]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info