Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Partition coefficient correlation with water solubility

Correlations of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients Koy, with Aqueous Solubilities S for Organic Chemicals at Room Temperature log ow = log S + ... [Pg.130]

Correlation with Physical and Chemical Properties — The Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (Kow)and Aqueous Solubility (S)... [Pg.161]

Isnard, P., Lambert, S. (1989) Aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficient correlations. Chemosphere 18, 1837-1853. IUPAC Solubility Data series (1985) Volume 20 Halogenated Benzenes, Toluenes and Phenols with Water. Horvath, A. L, Getzen, F.W., Eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, England. [Pg.938]

Although the undissociated (un-ionized) form of a drug has the higher lipid solubility, the un-ionized moieties themselves have differing lipid solubilities. A common way of assessing the lipid solubility of a drug is to measure its oil-water partition coefficient. As with pH, buccal absorption has been shown to be positively correlated with a drug s oil-water partition coefficient. [Pg.1074]

This equation has been mainly used in correlations of aqueous solubility of compounds, octanol/water partition coefficients and some other partition coefficients together with some biological properties [Kamlet, Abraham et al, 1984 Kamlet, Doherty et al, 1986a, 1987a, 1987c, 1988c[. [Pg.445]

The search for physical chemical correlates of drug action began as early as 1899 with the Meyer-Overton theory which stated that the potency of an anesthetic was directly proportional to its oil. water partition coefficient. The more lipid soluble the compound was, the more readily it was thought to penetrate the central nervous system. [Pg.110]

Dec, G S. Bancrjee, H.C. Sikka and E.J. Pack. Jr., Water Solubility and Octa-nol/Water Partition Coefficients of Organics Limitations of the Solubility-Partition Coefficient Correlation, preprint (submitted to Environ. Sci. TechnoL). (Revised version with same title published in Environ. Sci. TechnoL, 14, 1227-29 (1980). Authors listed as S. Banerjee, S. H. Yalkowsky, and S.C. Valvani.)... [Pg.52]

Fig. 2. Correlation of octanol-water partition coefficient with water solubility for selected aromatic liquids and solids at 25°C log A ow = -0.862 log S +0.710 (r = 0.994, n - 36). The solubilities of solid compounds in the plot are those of their supercooled liquids at 25°C. Fig. 2. Correlation of octanol-water partition coefficient with water solubility for selected aromatic liquids and solids at 25°C log A ow = -0.862 log S +0.710 (r = 0.994, n - 36). The solubilities of solid compounds in the plot are those of their supercooled liquids at 25°C.
It is poorly soluble in acetone, 2-butanone, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, and DMF, and insoluble in alcohols, petroleum ether, and diethyl ether. The partition coefficients of a number of solutes between PCL and water have been measured and correlated with octanol-water partition coefficients (Fig. 9) (58,59). The linear correlation (Eq. 2) when combined with the water solubility of the solutes serves as a method of estimating the solubility of drugs in PCL from first principles. ... [Pg.82]

In 1868 two Scottish scientists, Crum Brown and Fraser [4] recognized that a relation exists between the physiological action of a substance and its chemical composition and constitution. That recognition was in effect the birth of the science that has come to be known as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies a QSAR is a mathematical equation that relates a biological or other property to structural and/or physicochemical properties of a series of (usually) related compounds. Shortly afterwards, Richardson [5] showed that the narcotic effect of primary aliphatic alcohols varied with their molecular weight, and in 1893 Richet [6] observed that the toxicities of a variety of simple polar chemicals such as alcohols, ethers, and ketones were inversely correlated with their aqueous solubilities. Probably the best known of the very early work in the field was that of Overton [7] and Meyer [8], who found that the narcotic effect of simple chemicals increased with their oil-water partition coefficient and postulated that this reflected the partitioning of a chemical between the aqueous exobiophase and a lipophilic receptor. This, as it turned out, was most prescient, for about 70% of published QSARs contain a term relating to partition coefficient [9]. [Pg.470]

The binding constants of a number of compounds were measured using dialysis, solubility and sorption techniques. The solubility technique was used for compounds which were not radiolabeled. All data was collected at pH = 8.3. The binding constants were then compared to the octanol/water partition coefficients for the compounds and the molar solubilities of the compounds. The data is presented in Table II. The Kow values were taken from the literature.18 22-2 The solubility values were determined in this research with the exception of DDT and Lindane, which were taken from the literature. A plot of log Kc vs. log Kow is presented in Figure 5. The slope of this line is 0.71, the intercept is 0.75 and the value of the correlation coefficient is 0.9258. The regression is highly significant... [Pg.224]

The order of the mobilities of alachlor, butylate, and metolachlor in columns of various soils was metolachlor > alachlor > butylate. This correlates directly with the water solubilities and inversely to the adsorption coefficients and octanol/water partition coefficients of these compounds. Diffusion of these compounds in soil thin-layers was as follows butylate > alachlor > metolachlor, which correlates directly with the vapor pressures of these compounds. Significant soil properties affecting diffusion appeared to be bulk density and temperature. Soil moisture is also probably important, but its effect on the diffusion of these compounds was not determined. [Pg.231]

Many groups have discussed the correlation between solubility and molecular properties [14-19], and the octanol/water partition coefficient, the molecular volume and surface area, the boiling point and charge distribution in the molecules are well-documented molecular descriptors that correlate strongly with experimental solubility. [Pg.414]

In the multimedia models used in this series of volumes, an air-water partition coefficient KAW or Henry s law constant (H) is required and is calculated from the ratio of the pure substance vapor pressure and aqueous solubility. This method is widely used for hydrophobic chemicals but is inappropriate for water-miscible chemicals for which no solubility can be measured. Examples are the lower alcohols, acids, amines and ketones. There are reported calculated or pseudo-solubilities that have been derived from QSPR correlations with molecular descriptors for alcohols, aldehydes and amines (by Leahy 1986 Kamlet et al. 1987, 1988 and Nirmalakhandan and Speece 1988a,b). The obvious option is to input the H or KAW directly. If the chemical s activity coefficient y in water is known, then H can be estimated as vwyP[>where vw is the molar volume of water and Pf is the liquid vapor pressure. Since H can be regarded as P[IC[, where Cjs is the solubility, it is apparent that (l/vwy) is a pseudo-solubility. Correlations and measurements of y are available in the physical-chemical literature. For example, if y is 5.0, the pseudo-solubility is 11100 mol/m3 since the molar volume of water vw is 18 x 10-6 m3/mol or 18 cm3/mol. Chemicals with y less than about 20 are usually miscible in water. If the liquid vapor pressure in this case is 1000 Pa, H will be 1000/11100 or 0.090 Pa m3/mol and KAW will be H/RT or 3.6 x 10 5 at 25°C. Alternatively, if H or KAW is known, C[ can be calculated. It is possible to apply existing models to hydrophilic chemicals if this pseudo-solubility is calculated from the activity coefficient or from a known H (i.e., Cjs, P[/H or P[ or KAW RT). This approach is used here. In the fugacity model illustrations all pseudo-solubilities are so designated and should not be regarded as real, experimentally accessible quantities. [Pg.8]

As with solubility and octanol-water partition coefficient, vapor pressure can be estimated with a variety of correlations as discussed in detail by Burkhard et al. (1985a) and summarized as follows ... [Pg.17]

Measurements of aqueous solubility and partition coefficient between cellulose acetate and water were compared for thirty disperse dyes and an approximate inverse relationship was postulated [60]. This can only be valid to a limited extent, however, because the partition ratio also depends on the saturation solubility of the dye in cellulose acetate. This property varies from dye to dye and is not directly related to aqueous solubility. The solubilities of four dyes in a range of solvents were compared with their saturation values on cellulose acetate. Solubilities in benzene showed no significant correlation. With the other solvents the degree of correlation increased in the order ethanol < ethyl acetate < 20% aqueous diethylene glycol diacetate (CH3COOCH2CH2OCH2CH2OCOCH3). The last-named compound was suggested as a model with polar groups similar to those in cellulose acetate [86]. [Pg.128]

K generally varies only by factors of three to five for a given solute (12). K typically correlates well with physico-chemical properties of the sorbate, such as aqueous solubility (S) or the octanol-water partition coefficient (K ), again suggesting that hydrophobic interaction predominates. The correlation of Koc with K has led to the definition of linear free-energy relationships (LFER) of the form... [Pg.193]

Gryns (1896), Hedin (1897), and especially Overton (1900) looked at the permeability of a wide range of different compounds, particularly non-electrolytes, and showed that rates of penetration of solutes into erythrocytes increased with their lipid solubility. Overton correlated the rate of penetration of the solute with its partition coefficient between water and olive oil, which he took as a model for membrane composition. Some water-soluble molecules, particularly urea, entered erythrocytes faster than could be attributed to their lipid solubility—observations leading to the concept of pores, or discontinuities in the membrane which allowed water-soluble molecules to penetrate. The need to postulate the existence of pores offered the first hint of a mosaic structure for the membrane. Jacobs (1932) and Huber and Orskov (1933) put results from the early permeability studies onto a quantitative basis and concluded molecular size was a factor in the rate of solute translocation. [Pg.158]

Wohnsland and Faller ([175] performed measurements using a thin (9-10 //in) supported, phospholipid-free hexadecane layer. To validate their model, they used 32 well-characterized chemically diverse compounds. The permeability values obtained with their model could be correlated with known human absorption values if the maximum permeability obtained at different pH was taken into account. However, several disadvantages are related to this method. For hydrophilic drugs, hexadecane by itself has an increased barrier function in comparison with membranes. In addition, the hexadecane layers are not very stable, which makes this assay difficult to apply as a routine screening method. The advantage of this PAMPA setup is that it appears to be a satisfactory substitute for obtaining alkane-water partition coefficients, which are usually very difficult to measure directly, due to the poor solubility of drug molecules in alkanes. [Pg.190]


See other pages where Partition coefficient correlation with water solubility is mentioned: [Pg.88]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.923]    [Pg.1280]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.296]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.143 ]




SEARCH



Coefficient correlation

Correlation with partition coefficient

Partition coefficients correlations

Solubility correlation

Water coefficient

Water solubility coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info