Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle size, factors influencing, control

Hydrodynamics in the upper GI tract contribute to in vivo dissolution. Our ability to forecast dissolution of poorly soluble drugs in vitro depends on our knowledge of and ability to control hydrodynamics as well as other factors influencing dissolution. Provided suitable conditions (apparatus, hydrodynamics, media) are chosen for the dissolution test, it seems possible to predict dissolution limitations to the oral absorption of drugs and to reflect variations in hydrodynamic conditions in the upper GI tract. The fluid volume available for dissolution in the gut lumen, the contact time of the dissolved compound with the absorptive sites, and particle size have been identified as the main hydrodynamic determinants for the absorption of poorly soluble drugs in vivo. The influence of these factors is usually more pronounced than that of the motility pattern or the GI flow rates per se. [Pg.183]

The problems associated with the measurement and control of the flowrate of solids are much more complicated than those in the corresponding situation with liquids. The flow characteristics will depend, not only on particle size, size range and shape, but also on how densely the particles are packed. In addition, surface and electrical properties and moisture content all exert a strong influence on flow behaviour, and the combined effect of these factors is almost impossible to predict in advance. It is therefore desirable to carry out a preliminary qualitative assessment before making a selection of the, most appropriate technique for controlling and measuring flowrate for any particular application. [Pg.28]

These studies indicate that the charge transfer at the metal-oxide interface alters the electronic structure of the metal thin film, which in turn affects the adsorption of molecules to these surfaces. Understanding the effect that an oxide support has on molecular adsorption can give insight into how local environmental factors control the reactivity at the metal surface, presenting new avenues for tuning the properties of metal thin films and nanoparticles. Coupled with the knowledge of how particle size and shape modify the metal s electronic properties, these results can be used to predict how local structure and environment influence the reactivity at the metal surface. [Pg.16]

Microstructures of CLs vary depending on applicable solvenf, particle sizes of primary carbon powders, ionomer cluster size, temperafure, wetting properties of carbon materials, and composition of the CL ink. These factors determine the complex interactions between Pt/carbon particles, ionomer molecules, and solvent molecules, which control the catalyst layer formation process. The choice of a dispersion medium determines whefher fhe ionomer is to be found in solubilized, colloidal, or precipitated forms. This influences fhe microsfrucfure and fhe pore size disfribution of the CL. i It is vital to understand the conditions under which the ionomer is able to penetrate into primary pores inside agglomerates. Another challenge is to characterize the structure of the ionomer phase in the secondary void spaces between agglomerates and obtain the effective proton conductivity of the layer. [Pg.407]

The usual experimental criterion for diffusion control involves an evaluation of the rate of reaction as a function of particle size. At a sufficiently small particle size, the measured rate of reaction will become independent of particle size. The reaction rate can then be safely assumed to be independent of intraparticle mass transfer effects. At the other extreme, if the observed rate is inversely proportional to particle size, the reaction is strongly influenced by intraparticle diffusion. For a reaction whose rate is inhibited by the presence of products, there is an attendant danger of misinterpreting experimental results obtained for different particle sizes when a differential reactor is used, because, under these conditions, the effectiveness factor is sensitive to changes in the partial pressure of product. [Pg.164]

Several factors influence TGA data. Sample size and shape affect the rate and efficiency of decomposition. Powdered versus solid bulk samples will have different decomposition profiles due to the differing surface areas from which exiting decomposition products can leave the sample and be registered as mass losses. Similarly, the packing of the sample in the pan must be even and reproducible from run to run. Loosely distributed particles will heat more evenly and evolve volatilized products more evenly than mounded or densely packed samples. This can be especially important when looking at determinations of residual solvents, moisture or diffusion controlled losses such as plasticizer in the samples. [Pg.117]

This observation needs to be compared to the few literature reports on the underlying factors that control the preparation of the albumin particles by the emulsification process. For example, it has been widely reported that parameters such as the variability in stirring rates and temperature had a significant influence on the size of the resulting beads and it has been concluded that the main process variables were controlled by the oil phase of the emulsion. [Pg.237]

Powders vary dramatically in particle size on the basis of their origin. It is common for catalyst manufacturers to classify powders in order to assure users of consistency from batch to batch since suspension, settling rates, filtration, and performance in slurry-phase reactions are all dependent on particle size. The effect on suspension, settling rates, and filtration is obvious. However, factors that favor these are unfavorable for kinetics. For reactions controlled by transport rates from the bulk fluid to the surface of the catalyst, the overall reaction rate is a strong function of geometric surface area and thus is favored by small particles. Pore diffusion resistance is also minimized by smaller particles since reaction paths to active sites are smaller. The only mode of reaction control not influenced by particle size is for those reactions in which rate is controlled by reaction at active sites. Therefore, a compromise for optimum filtration and maximum reaction rates must be made. [Pg.108]

Particle radius affects both the potential energy of interaction and the diffusion coefficient. Hence particle size influences the rate under all conditions. Under reaction-control conditions, Fig. 4 shows that a l-pm increase in particle radius reduces the deposition rate by a factor of 5, while under mass-transfer... [Pg.109]

The above calculation is quite tedious and gets complicated by the fact that the properties which ultimately control the magnitude of these fourteen unknown quantities further depend on the physical and chemical parameters of the system such as reaction rate constants, initial size distribution of the feed, bed temperature, elutriation constants, heat and mass transfer coefficients, particle growth factors for char and limestone particles, flow rates of solid and gaseous reactants. In a complete analysis of a fluidized bed combustor with sulfur absorption by limestone, the influence of all the above parameters must be evaluated to enable us to optimize the system. In the present report we have limited the scope of our calculations by considering only the initial size of the limestone particles and the reaction rate constant for the sulfation reaction. [Pg.141]

Experimental data have shown that the first two items are factors of only secondary importance under conditions normally existing in commercial operations (73). Thus, conversion is not significantly affected by changing the vapor velocity (by altering the length/diameter ratio of the reactor, at constant volume), but is markedly influenced by temperature. Furthermore, the effect of catalyst particle size on cracking rate is ordinarily less pronounced than would be the case if mass transfer or diffusion were controlling. ... [Pg.414]


See other pages where Particle size, factors influencing, control is mentioned: [Pg.82]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.3110]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.630]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.241 , Pg.247 ]




SEARCH



Control factors

Controllable factors

Controllable influences

Controlled factor

Controlling factors

Controlling influence

Controlling particle size

Particle size control

Particles control

© 2024 chempedia.info