Particle contaminant removal

Solution Filtration. The polymer solution, free of unacetylated ceUulose, rigid particle contaminants, and dirt, must pass through spinnerets with holes of 30—80 ]lni diameter. Multistage filtration, usuaUy through plate-and-frame filter presses with fabric and paper filter media, removes the extraneous matter before extmsion. Undesirable gelatinous particles, such as the hemiceUulose acetates from ceUulose impurities, tend to be sheared into smaller particles rather than removed. The solution is also aUowed to degas in hoi ding tanks after each state of filtration. 

A typical example of this is the procedure known among practitioners as IMEC, in which there is sequential removal of organic and particle contamination followed by a metal-removing step, usually by the use of diluted HF followed by drying. It should be noted that this sequence is far more environmentally friendly than the typical RCA-clean sequence, as it uses less deionized water or chemicals. The chemicals used do not need to be as clean as those in the RCA-sequence. 

Contaminated soil is fed into a rotary dryer where the temperature is raised to between 500 and 800°F. As the soil is heated, moisture and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are vaporized. The heated exhaust gases from the dryer are forced through a baghouse where soil fines and dust particles are removed. Exhaust gases are then passed through a catalytic oxidizer to remove hydrocarbons. 

According to data published in 1997, a process using MAG SEP particles to remove contaminants from a wastewater stream would cost from 0.0019 to 0.005/gal. The authors state that treating the same waste stream using ion exchange resins would cost between 0,003 and 0.018/gal of water treated, and the cost for filtration/precipitation would be approximately 0.054/gal. Treatment costs were said to be dependent on contaminant loading and water chemistry (D17470T, p. 3). 

In the first method, any and all analytical methods are available to the analyst however, problems arise in two areas. First, the analyst must be sure that the particles are removed from the substrate and incorporated into the aliquot. Second, the mass of material is always limited, so extreme analytical sensitivity and very pure reagents are required. An example is the collection of fine particles with diameters less than 2.5 xm from a 10- xg/m3 fine aerosol for 4 h at a 20 L/min flow rate. The total particulate mass collected is 48 xg. This mass is removed from the filter or surface with 0.1 mL of solvent. The total dissolved particulate is 480 ppm in the solvent, and this concentration must be analyzed to about 1.1 ppm in accuracy. The analytical method needs to be sensitive at the 0.48-ppb level, and contaminants in the solvent must be held to such levels also. 

This model has been further expanded [92] to include a broader range of particle sizes, each exhibiting its own washout ratio, yet application of this expanded model is difficult due to the complexities in attributing particles of various sizes to their original atmospheric diameter and inefficiencies in separating small particles in rainwater. As such, the simpler model of Poster and Baker [93] is sufficiently specific and useful to examine the relative influences of operationally defined small and large particles on the total contaminant removal from the atmosphere by precipitation. 

Electrochemical technique (also electrocoagulation) is a simple and efficient method for the treatment of potable water. This process is characterized by a fast rate of contaminant removal, a compact size of the equipment, simplicity in operation and low capital and operating costs. Moreover, it is particularly more effective in treating wastewaters containing small and light suspended particles, such as oily restaurant wastewater, because of the accompanying electroflotation effect. 

The preparation of sterile materials requires execution of a number of supportive processes that together constitute the manufacturing process. They are intended to control bioburden, reduce particle levels, remove contaminants, sterilize, and/or depyrogenate. Nearly all of these activities occur within the controlled environments and are subject to qualification/validation. 

Reduction in viral infectivity occurs by inactivation of virus or by removal of virus particles. During removal steps, virus is not inactivated but is separated from the protein of interest using methods such as precipitation, chromatography, or filtration. For example, during an ethanol precipitation step, ethanol is added to a suspension to precipitate unwanted contaminating proteins and viruses. The ethanol-containing suspension is then centrifuged so that the contaminants in the precipitated paste fraction can be separated from the product in the effluent fraction. 

Rotary particle separator fRPS] Not suitable for producer gas and its contaminants Removed... 

Flocculation of fine particles in gases or liquids plays an important role in industrial environmental control systems. Solid particulate contaminants are often so small that their removal from liquid or gaseous effluents is not economically possible. The agglomeration of these solids into sometimes rather loose larger floes , conglomerates, or strings of particles facilitates removal with conventional, economic environmental control devices. 

Adsorption from solutions onto solid surfaces is important in many industrial practices, such as dye or organic contaminant removal, edible oil clarification by activated carbon, and ion exchange, where the adsorption of ions from electrolyte solutions is carried out. Adsorption from solution is also used in analytical chemistry in various chromatography applications. On the other hand, surfactant, polymer and biological material adsorption on solids, to modify the surface of solid particles in stabilizing dispersions, are also very important industrial fields. 

Particle contaminants in the coating. Particles in the coating resin that may abrade the fiber during or after fabrication must be removed by filtration. 

MF may be used to remove these heavy metals provided pretreatment chemicals are added to precipitate the metals to particles of filterable size. The chemical pretreatment step is crucial since it will affect the performance of the membrane and the resultant sludge volume as well as the contaminant removal efficiency. Reduction/oxidation, absorption/oxidation, and/or catalytic reactions are utilized along with pH adjustment to provide the optimum precipitation. Although conventional methods of waste water treatment may use a similar pretreatment chemistry, the final solid/liquid separation by gravity settling is usually not as effective as membrane filtration. 

---