Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Overseas developments

Not all EC countries have introduced legislation on occupational health. In France, for example, fhere is no law requiring treatment services but pre-employment medical examinations are mandatory. [Pg.428]

Holland and Belgium require medical services in companies of over a specified size. In Germany, doctors framed in occupational health must be employed in factories as must safety advisers, and in a number of other European countries the major concerns have occupational health services. [Pg.428]

Some countries use the factory as the site for a medical centre which provides clinical services for workers and their families as well as making available similar medical facilities fo those provided by many factory medical departments in the UK. [Pg.428]

In the USA the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) determines standards of occupation health and safety at work and organises training and research facilities. The Occupational Safety and Health Act 1970 applies to workers in industry, agriculture and construction sites and requires that employers must provide a place of work free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm to employees Elsewhere, occupational nursing arrangements generally reflect the national emphasis placed on occupational health. [Pg.429]


S. R. J. Robbins,M Feview ofFecent Trends in Selected Markets for Water Soluble Gums, Overseas Development Natural Resources Institute, bulletin no. 2, Kent, U.K., 1987. [Pg.437]

The authors thank the University Grants Commission and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi and the Overseas Development Administration, U.K. for support. [Pg.485]

D. G. CAMPION and B. R. CRITCHLEY—Overseas Development Administration, Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London W8 5SJ, England... [Pg.131]

The authors are indebted to many people for their invaluable contributions to this work, notably Peter Beevor, Ralph Lester, Alan Cork and Maureen Eyles at TPI, Malcolm Alder at ICI and Philip Hunter-Jones and Lawrence McVeigh of COPR. The field work in Egypt was part of a collaborative project between the Overseas Development Administration and the Egyptian Academy of Sciences, and assistance by Ain Shams University and the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture is gratefully acknowledged. [Pg.143]

Figure 6.3 Effect of solvents on the penetration of DDT to tsetse flies. (From Hadaway, A.B., Bar-low, F., and Flower, L.S., Ministry of Overseas Development, Miscellaneous Report No. 22, Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, London, 1976.)... Figure 6.3 Effect of solvents on the penetration of DDT to tsetse flies. (From Hadaway, A.B., Bar-low, F., and Flower, L.S., Ministry of Overseas Development, Miscellaneous Report No. 22, Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, London, 1976.)...
Overseas Development Institution. (1995). Joint evaluation of emergency assistance to Rwanda. Study III Humanitarian aid and effects. London Author. [Pg.586]

Bird, N., and Dickson, C. (2005). Poverty reduction strategy papers Making the case for forestry. ODI Forestry Briefing (No. 7). London Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Bodeker, G. (1999). Valuing biodiversity for Human Health and Well-being Traditional Health Systems. In Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. Posey, D.A. (Ed). London and Nairobi Intermediate Tecnology Publications, United Nations Environment Programme. [Pg.241]

Wass, P. Kenya s Indegenous Eorests Status, Management and Conservation. The lUCN Forest Conservation Programme No. 19. Overseas Development Administration. UK, 1995. [Pg.523]

Weeks, J.M. and Williams, T.M. (1994) Preliminary Field Trial of a Method for the Rapid Assessment of Invertebrate Stress from Mining-related Arsenic and Heavy Metal Contamination Wanderer Gold Mine, Zimbabwe. Overseas Development Administration, London. [Pg.205]

HID, 1994. Environmental Synopsis of Indonesia. International Institute for Einvironment and Development, Overseas Development Administration, London. [Pg.454]

As the combat period approached, Colonel Unmacht and his stafiF turned their attention from numerous projects in gas warfare defense and decontamination to the nontoxic chemical weapons and munitions. Their work on the flame thrower tank, and later on stabilized flame thrower fuels, was the outstanding overseas development work of the worldwide CWS. Unmacht was a strong proponent of the use of the 4.2-inch chemical mortar with high-explosive shell, and the development, testing, and combat supply of a landing craft mortar mounting for Pacific amphibious operations represented one of his achievements in the field of combat support. The mortar gun boat development was also a noteworthy example of Army-Navy co-operation. [Pg.232]

Colonel Unmacht was an unusually dynamic officer who was not afraid to use his energy in any way he felt might contribute to the war effort. Few other chemical officers would have believed possible the overseas development, much less the assembly, of a main armament dame thrower tank. Unmacht not only believed it possible— he got the job done. His willingness to undertake large responsibilities in no small measure contributed to the success of the CWS in the Central Pacific and to the esteem in which the service was held. The Central Pacific situation also contributed because the commander, not being also a supreme commander as in other theaters, had the time to give support to his services. The Central Pacific Army commander did not command combat operations, but his support as senior Army commander in the theater for most of the war made easier the operation of the CWS. The CWS also enjoyed an excellent relationship with the POA and Navy commands in the area because it was able to provide services and weapons support when the Navy and the Marine Corps wanted them. The Central Pacific Area and the military facilities in the area offered a unique opportunity for accomplishment. The CWS administration in the theater was almost ideally suited to these circumstances. [Pg.234]

Sources Gaiha (2005) Murgai and Ravallion (2005) Overseas Development Institute (2005) ... [Pg.489]

Adams, Lesley, and Paul Harvey. 2006. Learning from Cash Responses to the Tsunami Disbursement Mechanisms. London Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Policy Group. [Pg.517]

Ali, Degan, A. FantaToure, andTilleke Kiewied. 2005. Cash Reliifin a Contested Area Lessonsfrom Somalia. Network Paper 50. London Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Practice Network. [Pg.520]

Ayala, Francisco. 2006a. Familias en Accion, Colombia. Policy Brief 2. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.521]

Farrington, John, N. C. Saxena, Tamsyn Barton, and Radhika Nayak. 2003. Post Offices, Pensions and Computers New Opportunities for Combining Growth and Social Protection in Weakly Integrated Rural Areas klz.tut2l Resource Perspectives 87. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.533]

Harvey, Paul. 2005. Cash and Vouchers in Emergencies. Humanitarian Policy Group Discussion Paper. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.537]

Jaspars, Susanne, and Helen Young. 1995. General Food Distribution in Emergencies From Nutritional Needs to Political Priorities. Relief and Rehabilitation Network, Good Practice Review 3. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.540]

Lind, Jeremy, andTeriessa JaUeta. 2005. Poverty, Power and Relief Assistance Meanings and Perceptions of Dependency in Ethiopia. Background paper. London Overseas Development Institute, Humanitarian Pohcy Group. [Pg.543]

McCord, Anna. 2004a. Policy Expectations and Programme Reality The Poverty Reduction and Labour Market Impact of Two Public Works Programmes in South Africa. Economics and Statistics Analysis Unit working paper. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.545]

Overseas Development Institute. 2005. The Maharastra Employment Guarantee Scheme. Policy Brief 6. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.548]

Samson, Michael, Kenneth MacQuene, and Ingrid van Niekerk. 2006. Social Grants, South Africa. Policy Brief 1. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.553]

Sharp, Kay, Taylor Brown, and Amdissa Teshome. 2006. Targeting Ethiopia s Productive Safety Net Programme. London, Bristol, and Addis Ababa Overseas Development Instimte, IDL Group, and A-Z Capacity Building Consult. [Pg.554]

Sjoblom, Disa, and John Farrington. 2008. The Indian National Rural Employment Guarantee Act Will It Reduce Poverty and Boost the Economy/ Project Briefing 7. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.555]

Edwards, D.M. 1993. The marketing of non-timber forest products from the Himalayas The Trade between East Nepal and India. In Rural Development Forestry Network (Overseas Development Institute, London) Paper, 15b 1—21. [Pg.390]

Rose Innes, R., A Manual of Ghana Grasses, Ministry of Overseas Development, Surbiton, 1977. [Pg.466]

Alder, D. (1989). Natural forest increment, growth and yield. In J. L. G. Wong (Ed.), Ghana forest inventory project seminar proceedings (pp. 47-52). Accra Overseas Development Agency, Forestry Department. [Pg.1366]

One of the current debates concerns the issue as to whether or not it is meaningful to look at IDPs as a distinct category of concern. The International Committee of the Red Cross, for instance, maintains that ICRC does not believe that someone displaced is automatically more vulnerable than someone who is not (ICRC 2009 20) and a study by the Overseas Development Institute stressed that identifying IDPs as a distinct category has not ame ho rated their situation (Collinson, Darcy, and Waddell 2009 53). Similarly, James Hathaway has asked Why should they be treated as a category of concern distinguished from other internal human rights victims who have not been displaced (Hathaway 2007 360). [Pg.146]

CoUinson, S., Darcy, J., Waddell, N., et al. (2009) Realising Protection The Uncertain Benefits of Civilian, Refugee and IDP Status. HPG Report 28. London Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.151]

Bhatia, M., and Goodhand, J., with Atmar, H., Pain, A., and Suleman, M. (2003) Proflts and Poverty Aid Livelihoods and Conflict in Afghanistan. Pp. 67-90 in S. Collinson (ed.). Power, Livelihoods and Conflict Case Studies in Political Economy Analysis for Humanitarian Action. HPG Report 13. London Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.160]

CoUinson, S. (2003), Power, Livelihoods and Conflict Case Studies in Political Economy Analysis for Humanitarian Action HPG Report 13. London Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute. [Pg.161]

CoUinson, S., etal. (2010) States of Fragility StabUisation and its Implications for Humanitarian Action. Humanitarian Policy Group Working Paper, Overseas Development Institute, August... [Pg.251]

Metcalfe, V., et al. (2011) Integration and Humanitarian Space An Independent Study Commissioned by the UN Integration Steering Group. Humanitarian PoUcy Group/Overseas Development Institute and the Stimson Centre, December. [Pg.251]


See other pages where Overseas developments is mentioned: [Pg.131]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.260]   


SEARCH



Overseas Development Institute

© 2024 chempedia.info