Occupancy cost

The book does not focus on occupational safety and health issues, although improved process safety can benefit each area. Detailed engineering designs are outside the scope of the book. This book intends to identify issues and concerns in batch reaction systems and provides potential solutions to address these concerns. This should be of value to process design engineers, operators, maintenance personnel, as well as members of process hazards analysis teams. While the book offers potential solutions to specific issues/concerns, ultimately the user needs to make the case for the solutions that best satisfy their company s requirements for a balance between risk reduction and cost. In many instances the book provides one or more sources of additional information on the subject which could be of value to the reader. 

Occupancy No. of fires Loss 000 % of total cost of all fires... 

Another advantage of the addition of inorganic filler is the significant increase in density of the silicone, which helps the dispensing process. The use of fillers also reduces the total cost of the product, as the expensive high performance silicone does not require 100% volume occupancy to fulfil its function. 

The requirements of the automotive industry are more demanding than some other industries. Automotive products have to be safe, reliable, and maintainable, protect the occupants, and have minimal impact on the environment in their manufacture, use, and disposal. The automotive sector is a very competitive market and as a consequence costs have to be optimized. There is little margin for excessive variation, as variation causes waste and waste costs money and time. Therefore several methods have evolved to reduce variation. Among them are SPC, FMEA, MSA, and many other techniques The automotive industry believes that the more their suppliers adopt such variation reduction techniques the more likely it will be that the resultant product will be brought to the market more quickly and its production process be more efficient. 

Perhaps, even more important, is the stagnation in our safety and environmental performance in the last five years. Until five years ago, we had seen dramatic year on year improvement in every aspect of safety and environmental performance. This has slowed down in all areas and ceased altogether in occupational safety. I expect that these changes will invigorate all our programs. Our current safety and environmental performance costs us at least 30 million each year in avoidable costs such as capital damage and clean-up costs. If we could put a dollar value on injuries to our work-force, the savings would likely be ten times this amount. 

It has been estimated that hundreds of billions of dollars per year is lost due to decreased workplace productivity and increased health costs that can be saved by maintaining good indoor air quality in commercial buildings. The financial benefits of improving lAQ can accrue from reducing costs for health care and sick leave, as well as the costs of performance decrements at work caused by illness or adverse health symptoms and of responding to occupant complaints and costs of LAQ investigations. 

H. Safety considerations. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), US Department of Labor, standard entitled Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories (29 CFR 1910.1450) makes it necessary to address safety issues in the SOP. The standard requires laboratories that use hazardous chemicals to maintain employee exposures at or below the permissible exposure limits specified for these chemicals in 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart Z. Hazards associated with any specific chemicals used in a method must be addressed so that the user has the information needed to follow the Chemical Hygiene Plan for their laboratory. The method developer should limit the use of hazardous chemicals where feasible. The use of toxic and/or carcinogenic reagents should be avoided or eliminated as much as possible. Additionally, the cost of disposal is increasing and could impact the practicality of a method. Material Safety Data Sheets for the analyte(s) and any unusual or hazardous reagents should be provided for the user. 

The financial impact of pain is considered to be significant. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) estimated that the cost of low back pain alone was between 50 billion and 100 billion per year.12 The American Productivity Audit of the United States workforce, conducted from 2001 to 2002, revealed that the cost of lost productivity due to arthritis, back pain, headache, and other musculoskeletal pain was approximately 80 billion per year.13... 

For accidents affecting process plant buildings, the potential for serious or fatal injury to building occupants is the foremost concern. Additionally, in cases where buildings house critical controls or equipment, proper design and siting may also help reduce indirect safety impacts (e.g., due to loss of process control), as well as business interruption costs and property loss from such events. 

Moderate Building performs function. Building is not reusable following an explosion. Major repairs needed that equal or exceed replacement cost. Risk of some injury to some occupants caused by building damage. Ten to 90 days of downtime. 

Building evaluations must take into account the need for a cost-effective approach that allows facilities to focus resources on those buildings that present a significant risk to occupants, with assurances that all buildings that may be impacted by explosion or fire are appropriately considered. 

Evaluating risk to process plant building occupants can be accomplished through detailed qualitative and/or quantitative risk assessment. However, because of the large numbers of buildings and varying plant situations involved, these types of studies could be costly and time-consuming if applied in all cases, and should be reserved for those situations for which cost-effective solutions cannot otherwise be identified. 

Low-cost modification of existing buildings may reduce or eliminate the risks to occupants. 

Traditionally, residential mechanical equipment has been treated as independent devices that have little or no impact on the rest of the building other than the obvious stated purpose. Bath fans, dryers, and kitchen ranges are assumed to exhaust moisture, lint, and cooking by-products, but to have no impact on the performance of chimneys. Instances have been reported that show that this is not the case in some houses where the fireplaces and other combustion appliances backdraft52 when one or more of the exhaust fans are in operation. Houses have been reported in which the operation of exhaust devices increases the radon concentration.53 Houses have been found in which pressure differences between different rooms of the house caused by HVAC distribution fans have increased energy costs,54 occupant discomfort,54,55 condensation of the building shell,55 and radon concentrations in parts of the houses.29,56 All of these effects are the result of air pressure relationships created by the interaction of equipment, indoor/outdoor temperature differences, wind velocity, and moisture and radon availability. 

---