Enantiomers difference between

Enantiomers have identical or nearly identical physical properties unless a reagent or technique is used that is itself chiral. For example, the two enantiomers in Figure 4.2 will have the same boiling point, melting point, refractive index and density since these are bulk effects and cannot discriminate between the two enantiomers. Differences between enantiomers only become apparent when they interact with chiral reagents such as the active sites of enzymes or the chiral stationary phase of a HPLC column. 

Figure 7 7 shows why equal amounts of (R) and (5) 1 2 epoxypropane are formed m the epoxidation of propene There is no difference between the top face of the dou ble bond and the bottom face Peroxyacetic acid can transfer oxygen to either face with equal facility the rates of formation of the R and S enantiomers of the product are the same and the product is racemic... 

Enantiomeric excess (Section 7 4) Difference between the per centage of the major enantiomer present in a mixture and the percentage of its mirror image An optically pure material has an enantiomenc excess of 100% A racemic mixture has an enantiomeric excess of zero... 

A useful way of describing the difference between (+) and (—) enantiomers is that one is the mirror image of the other. In other words, neither enantiomer is superimposable on its mirror image. 

Care should be exercised when attempting to interpret in vivo pharmacological data in terms of specific chemical—biological interactions for a series of asymmetric compounds, particularly when this interaction is the only parameter considered in the analysis (10). It is important to recognize that the observed difference in activity between optical antipodes is not simply a result of the association of the compound with an enzyme or receptor target. Enantiomers differ in absorption rates across membranes, especially where active transport mechanisms are involved (11). They bind with different affinities to plasma proteins (12) and undergo alternative metaboHc and detoxification processes (13). This ultimately leads to one enantiomer being more available to produce a therapeutic effect. 

Kinetic Resolutions. From a practical standpoint the principal difference between formation of a chiral molecule by kinetic resolution of a racemate and formation by asymmetric synthesis is that in the former case the maximum theoretical yield of the chiral product is 50% based on a racemic starting material. In the latter case a maximum yield of 100% is possible. If the reactivity of two enantiomers is substantially different the reaction virtually stops at 50% conversion, and enantiomericaHy pure substrate and product may be obtained ia close to 50% yield. Convenientiy, the enantiomeric purity of the substrate and the product depends strongly on the degree of conversion so that even ia those instances where reactivity of enantiomers is not substantially different, a high purity material may be obtained by sacrificing the overall yield. 

It is seen from equation (22) that there will, indeed, be a temperature at which the separation ratio of the two solutes will be independent of the solvent composition. The temperature is determined by the relative values of the standard free enthalpies of the two solutes between each solvent and the stationary phase, together with their standard free entropies. If the separation ratio is very large, there will be a considerable difference between the respective standard enthalpies and entropies of the two solutes. As a consequence, the temperature at which the separation ratio becomes independent of solvent composition may well be outside the practical chromatography range. However, if the solutes are similar in nature and are eluted with relatively small separation ratios (for example in the separation of enantiomers) then the standard enthalpies and entropies will be comparable, and the temperature/solvent-composition independence is likely be in a range that can be experimentally observed. 

The substantial difference between these two chromatograms was a clear proof that CSP 13 interacted differently with the mixtures of l and d enantiomers. This also indicated the presence of at least one pair of enantiomers that interacted selectively with the CSP. Unfortunately, a tedious synthesis of 16 sublibraries (eight l and eight d) containing decreasing numbers of blocks had to be prepared to deconvolute the best selector. A comparison of the chromatograms obtained from these sublibraries in each deconvolution step was used again, and those selectors for which no difference was observed were eliminated. This procedure enabled the identification... 

Discrimination between the enantiomers of a racemic mixture is a complex task in analytical sciences. Because enantiomers differ only in their structural orientation, and not in their physico-chemical properties, separation can only be achieved within an environment which is unichiral. Unichiral means that a counterpart of the race-mate to be separated consists of a pure enantiomeric form, or shows at least enrichment in one isomeric form. Discrimination or separation can be performed by a wide variety of adsorption techniques, e.g. chromatography in different modes and electrophoresis. As explained above, the enantioseparation of a racemate requires a non-racemic counterpart, and this can be presented in three different ways ... 

Note carefully the difference between enantiomers and diastereomers. Enantiomers have opposite configurations at all chirality centers, whereas diastereomers have opposite configurations at some (one or more) chirality centers but the same configuration at others. A full description of the four stereoisomers of threonine is given in Table 9.2. Of the four, only the 2S,3R isomer, [o]D= -28.3, occurs naturally in plants and animals and is an essential human nutrient. This result is typical most biological molecules are chiral, and usually only one stereoisomer is found in nature. 

The reactions of allylboronates 1 (R = H or CH3) may proceed either by way of transition state 3, in which the a-substituent X adopts an axial position, or 4 in which X occupies an equatorial position. These two pathways are easily distinguished since 3 provides 7 with a Z-olefin, whereas 4 provides 8 with an E-olefinic linkage. There is also a second fundamental stereochemical difference between these two transition states 7 and 8 are heterochirally related from reactions in which 1 is not racemic. That is, 7 and 8 arc enantiomers once the stereochemistry-associated with the double bond is destroyed. Thus, the selectivity for reaction by way of 3 in preference to 4, or via 6 in preference to 5 in reactions of a-subsliluted (Z)-2-butenylboronate 2, is an important factor that determines the suitability of these reagents for applications in enantioselective or acyclic diastereoselective synthesis. 

These two compounds are different from each other even though the atoms are connected in the same way. The difference between them comes from their positions in 3D space. Therefore, they are called stereoisomers ( stereo for space). More specifically, they are called enantiomers, because the two compounds are mirror images of each other and they are not superimposable. If we construct models of these two compounds, we see that they are not the same—i.e., they cannot be superimposed. 

The need to develop and use chiral chromatographic techniques to resolve racemates in pesticide residues will be driven by new hazard and risk assessments undertaken using data from differential metabolism studies. The molecular structures of many pesticides incorporate chiral centers and, in some cases, the activity differs between enantiomers. Consequently, in recent years manufacturers have introduced resolved enantiomers to provide pesticides of higher activity per unit mass applied. For example, the fungicide metalaxyl is a racemic mix of R- and 5-enantiomers, both having the same mode of action but differing considerably in effectiveness. The -enantiomer is the most effective and is marketed as a separate product metalaxyl-M. In future, it will not be satisfactory to rely on hazard/risk assessments based on data from metabolism studies of racemic mixes. The metabolism studies will need to be undertaken on one, or more, of the resolved enantiomers. 

For the Pd-silk catalyst,2 PdCl2 was deposited on silk and reduced to Pd° moderate enantioselectivities were obtained for the hydrogenation of a C=C bond (66% enantiomeric excess, ee, which is the difference between enantiomers divided by the sum of enantiomers), but the silk support presented two problems it tended to deteriorate with time on stream and it varied from source to source, so enantioselectivities were not reproducible (Scheme 3.2). On the other hand, deterioration was not a problem with the metal-quartz catalysts. 

The influence of the weak interaction on chemical reactions can be calculated since it favours left-handedness, it has an effect on the energy content of molecules and thus on their stability. In the case of the amino acids, the L-form would be more stable than the corresponding D-form to a very small extent. Theoretical calculations (using ab initio methods), in particular by Mason and Tranter (1983), indicated that the energy difference between two enantiomers due to the parity violation is close to 10 14J/mol (Buschmann et al., 2000). More recent evidence suggests that the... 

Tranter, G. E. 1985a. The Parity Violating Energy Differences Between the Enantiomers of a-amino Acids. Mol. Phys. 56, 825-838. 

---