Mohs scratch hardness

Figure 1.3 Correlation between the Moh scratch hardness and Vickers indentation hardness scales.

However, to develop some intuitive sense of hardness it is useful to consider the Moh scratch hardness scale. This is a rank-hle scale consisting of ten levels. Each level has been assigned to a particular mineral such that the mineral at level n is capable of scratching the one at level (n - l).The mineral at the lowest level (designated 1) is talc, and the highest (designated 10) is diamond. 

Correlations between differing measures of hardness are discussed by Mott (1957). A correlation diagram for Mohs scratch hardness and indentation hardness in the case of minerals is given in Figure 2.11. 

Indentation data for the sulfides could not be found in the literature. However, Mohs scratch hardness numbers were found (Winkler, 1955). They were converted to Vickers numbers using a correlation chart. The hardnesses are shown in Figure 9.10. Since they all have the same number of valence electrons, this is the same as plotting the hardnesses versus the valence electron densities. 

Physical hardness can be defined to be proportional, and sometimes equal, to the chemical hardness (Parr and Yang, 1989). The relationship between the two types of hardness depends on the type of chemical bonding. For simple metals, where the bonding is nonlocal, the bulk modulus is proportional to the chemical hardness density. The same is true for non-local ionic bonding. However, for covalent crystals, where the bonding is local, the bulk moduli may be less appropriate measures of stability than the octahedral shear moduli. In this case, it is also found that the indentation hardness—and therefore the Mohs scratch hardness—are monotonic functions of the chemical hardness density. 

There has also been a modest use of the sillimanite minerals as abrasives. This was originally a matter of convenience, perhaps even mistaking them for corundum. However, the recent globalization of trade has practically eliminated this application, given the modest hardness of the sillimanites, only about 7 on the mineralogical Mohs scratch hardness scale. This hardness level cannot compete with corundum and the recently developed and quite superior synthetic abrasives. 

Indentation has been discussed in Section 16.3. Although these tests could be used for gemstones, they are not, except as a calibration. The Mohs scratch hardness scale is much more popular since the principle is to test what the stone will scratch, not what will scratch the stone. 

Scratch Te.st. The scratch microhardness test is a refinement of the Mohs test. The corner of a cubic diamond is drawn across the surface of a metaHographicaHy poHshed sample under a constant load, usuaHy 29.4 N (3 kgf). The width of the resultant Vee groove scratch varies inversely with the hardness of the material displaced where H = scratch hardness number and A = groove width in micrometers. 

Table 14.3 contains comparative hardness values for five hardness scales including the classical Mohs scale, which ranges from the force necessary to indent talc given a value of 1 to that needed to scratch diamond given a Mohs value of 10. In the field, a number of relative tests have been developed to measure relative hardness. The easiest test for scratch hardness is to simply see how hard you have to push your fingernail into a material to indent it. A more reliable approach involves scratching the material with pencils of specified hardness (ASTM-D-3363) and noting the pencil hardness necessary to indent the material. 

The test bars of the Nile mud were reddish brown (5YR 5/4) in the Munsell color notation at the 600°C zone of the gradient firing, red (2.5YR 5/6) at 850°C, and darkened with incipient vitrification to weak red (2.5YR 4/3) at 1100°C after a holding period of 30 minutes. The scratch hardness, using Mohs scale, increased from 3.0 to 6.5 for the male (better working clay in the potters terminology), and from 2.3 to 5.0 for the female mud. The Nile mud shrank far more when fired... 

Any fertilizer materials are minerals and have certain hardness values and therefore cause wear. Other plant nutrient salts or chemicals, particularly in the presence of moisture, will additionally produce corrosion. It is apt in this context to know some details of the scratch hardness of minerals which cause wear and abrasion, and this is normally measured in terms of Mohs scale [8]. 

Mohs hardness is a measure of the relative hardness and resistance to scratching between minerals. Other hardness scales rely on the ability to create an indentation into the tested mineral (such as the Rockwell, Vickers, and Brinell hardness - these are used mainly to determine hardness in metals and metal alloys). The scratch hardness is related to the breaking of the chemical bonds in the material, creation of micro fractures on the surface, or displacing atoms in the metals of the mineral. Generally, minerals with covalent bonds are the hardest while minerals with ionic, metallic, or van der Waals bonding are much softer. 

Mackensen-Zeiss blower method, 39,101 Martens sclerometer, 48, 49 McGee s method, 92 Mean Mohs-Mackensen hardness, 106 Method, Blondel s 92 Bohme s disc, 90 Brinell, 36, 58 Davidenkov scratch point, 50 Davidenkov s, 50 dry friction without balls, 92 Harvey s 92... 

Some investigators believe that the best course to follow in scratch hardness determination is to find the tangential force acting on the surface of material under test required to obtain a scratch of width b. In this case, hardness is expressed as the ratio of that force to the scratch cross-section or a magnitude proportional to it, or else as a quotient of the work necessary to produce the scratch and its volume. Proponents of this method (Yushkin, 1971) consider that scratch hardness tests in the present form play only a marginal role. Unlike Shreyner (1949), who contended that the results obtained under these methods are less accurate than those for mineral-bymineral scratch after Mohs, they accept that these tests have certain usefulness, but only of a complementary nature. The differences of opinion arise from the different approach to the question of accuracy of the method of determination itself, since as can readily be proved, a strict relationship exists between hardness defined as the ratio of load P to square of... 

Two kinds of hardness can be measured scratch hardness and indentation hardness. Special styluses are available to measure the scratch hardness. These are provided with a crystal tip which has a certain hardness. When a material is scratched with a certain stylus and no scratch is made, then the material has a higher hardness than the tip of the stylus. By using different styluses you can accurately determine the hardness. This method is often applied in mineralogy, e.g. by mineral collectors. Hardness is ranked along the Mohs scale, which is based on the hardness of minerals. In this scale talc is the softest mineral, which becomes clear when you rub it between your fingers. 

The microstructures were investigated by examining in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) polished, resin-impregnated sections, prepared from small fragments (typically 2-3 mm diameter) taken from the objects. When necessary, x-ray diffraction was used to confirm the identification of the crystalline phases. The hardness values were determined by using the Mohs scratch test, and the color groupings were defined... 

Hardness measurements using the Mohs scratch test were undertaken on the complete range of ancient and laboratory-produced Egyptian Blue samples (Appendix B HAR and Table I, respectively). 

Scratch hardness is the oldest form of hardness measurement and was probably first developed by mineralogists. It depends on the ability of one solid to scratch another or to be scratched by another solid. The method was first put on a semiquantitative basis by Mohs (1882) who selected ten minerals as standards, beginning with talc (scratch hardness 1) and ending with diamond (scratch hardness 10). 

Another type of scratch hardness which is a logical development of the Mohs scale consists of drawing a diamond stylus, under a definite load, across the surface to be examined. The hardness is determined by the width or depth of the resulting scratch the harder the material the smaller the scratch. This method has some value as a means of measuring the variation in hardness across a grain boundary. In general, however, the scratch sclerometer is a difficult instrument to operate. 

Scratch hardness may be measured on Mohs scale, which ranges from 1 for talc to 10 for diamonds, or by scratching with pencils of specified hardness (ASTM-D-3363). Hardness may also be measured by the number of bounces of a ball or the amount of rocking by a Sward hardness rocker. Abrasion resistance may be measured by the loss in weight caused by the rubbing of the wheels of a Taber abraser (ASTM-D-1044). 

Hardness - The resistance of a material to deformation, indentation, or scratching. Hardness is measured on various scales, such as Mohs, Brinell, Knoop, Rockwell, and Vickers. [10]... 

Basically, scratch hardness is a measure of the resistance the test sample has to being scratched by other materials. The most common way of qualifying this property is by means of the Mohs scale. On this scale various materials are classified from 1 to 10. The materials used, as shown in Figure 3.46, range from talc (1) to diamond (10). Each material on the scale can scratch the materials that have a lower Mohs number however, the Mohs scale is not of much value for classifying plastic materials, because most common plastics fall in the 2-3 Mohs range. However, the basic technique of scratch hardness may be used to establish the relative merits of different plastic materials fi om their ability to scratch one another. 

H—Hardness. There are different types of hardness. Why Because the value of a material s hardness depends on how it is tested. The hardness of a material is its resistance to the formation of a permanent surface impression by an indenter. You will also see it defined as resistance of a material to deformation, scratching, and erosion. So the geometry of the indenter tip and the crystal orientation (and therefore the microstructure) will affect the hardness. In ceramics, there tends to be wide variations in hardness because it involves plastic deformation and cracking. Table 16.4 lists hardness values on the Mohs hardness scale, a scratch test that can be used to compare hardness of different minerals. For example, quartz has a Mohs hardness of 7, which made flint (a cryptocrystalline quartz) particularly useful in prehistoric times for shaping bone (the mineral component is apatite with hardness 5) and shell (the mineral component is calcite with hardness 3). Mohs hardness scale was not the first scratch hardness technique. As long ago as 1690, Christian Huygens, the famous astronomer, had noticed anisotropy in scratch hardness. 

Mohs, Fredrich (1773-1839) introduced the term scratch hardness in 1826. He was born in Gernrode/Harz Germany and studied at the University of Halle and at Freiberg he later worked in Austria. 

Hardness has been generally defined by Martens in about 1900 as the resistance of a material able to counter the penetration of another harder material. Sometimes, also in polymer testing, the older definition of hardness as a scratch resistance first introduced by Mohs in 1820 is used. The scratch resistance to be determined in the form of the scratch hardness applying depth-sensing approaches or the Buchholz hardness, for example, is used for characterising (1) elastic and plastic deformations, (2) adhesive failure and crack formation, (3) abrasion and (4) recovery of strains and residual stresses of paintings, coatings or surface modification etc. 

Diamond is the hardest material known, with a value of 10 on the Mohs scale, which is a scratch hardness test or, on the Knoop scale, which is an indentation test dependent on the load, indenter shape and the crystal face, giving a value of 5,700-10,400 kgmm . The hardness is attributed to the strength of bonding of the atoms in conjunction with the uniformity. There is, however, a possibility that there are new materials, sueh as carbon nitride (C3N4) and compressed Ceo that may eventually be shown to be harder than diamond. 

---