Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Modelling solubility limits

There are various parameters and assumptions defining radionuclide behavior that are frequently part of model descriptions that require constraints. While these must generally be determined for each particular site, laboratory experiments must also be conducted to further define the range of possibilities and the operation of particular mechanisms. These include the reversibility of adsorption, the relative rates of radionuclide leaching, the rates of irreversible incorporation of sorbed nuclides, and the rates of precipitation when concentrations are above Th or U mineral solubility limits. A key issue is whether the recoil rates of radionuclides can be clearly related to the release rates of Rn the models are most useful for providing precise values for parameters such as retardation factors, and many values rely on a reliable value for the recoil fluxes, and this is always obtained from Rn groundwater activities. These values are only as well constrained as this assumption, which therefore must be bolstered by clearer evidence. [Pg.354]

Various models of SFE have been published, which aim at understanding the kinetics of the processes. For many dynamic extractions of compounds from solid matrices, e.g. for additives in polymers, the analytes are present in small amounts in the matrix and during extraction their concentration in the SCF is well below the solubility limit. The rate of extraction is then not determined principally by solubility, but by the rate of mass transfer out of the matrix. Supercritical gas extraction usually falls very clearly into the class of purely diffusional operations. Gere et al. [285] have reported the physico-chemical principles that are the foundation of theory and practice of SCF analytical techniques. The authors stress in particular the use of intrinsic solubility parameters (such as the Hildebrand solubility parameter 5), in relation to the solubility of analytes in SCFs and optimisation of SFE conditions. [Pg.85]

Bartle et al. [286] described a simple model for diffusion-limited extractions from spherical particles (the so-called hot-ball model). The model was extended to cover polymer films and a nonuniform distribution of the extractant [287]. Also the effect of solubility on extraction was incorporated [288] and the effects of pressure and flow-rate on extraction have been rationalised [289]. In this idealised scheme the matrix is supposed to contain small quantities of extractable materials, such that the extraction is not solubility limited. The model is that of diffusion out of a homogeneous spherical particle into a medium in which the extracted species is infinitely dilute. The ratio of mass remaining (m ) in the particle of radius r at time t to the initial amount (mo) is given by ... [Pg.85]

In solubility limited extractions the rate is reduced at the beginning of the extraction. Models for SFE predict that these extractions should be carried out at as high a temperature and pressure as possible. However, the polymer will eventually soften and melt, and the particles will coalesce. [Pg.86]

Still, the strain enthalpy is of particular importance. An elastic continuum model for this size mismatch enthalpy shows that, within the limitations of the model, this enthalpy contribution correlates with the square of the volume difference [41,42], The model furthermore predicts what is often observed experimentally for a given size difference it is easier to put a smaller atom in a larger host than vice versa. Both the excess enthalpy of mixing and the solubility limits are often asymmetric with regard to composition. This elastic contribution to the enthalpy of mixing scales with the two-parameter sub-regular solution model described in Chapter 3 (see eq. 3.74) ... [Pg.219]

The utility of SCFs for PTC was demonstrated for several model organic reactions - the nucleophilic displacement of benzyl chloride with bromide ion (26) and cyanide ion (27), which were chosen as model reversible and irreversible Sn2 reactions. The next two reactions reported were the alkylation and cycloalkylation of phenylacetonitrile (28,29). Catalyst solubility in the SCF was very limited, yet the rate of reaction increased linearly with the amount of catalyst present. Figure 5 shows data for the cyanide displacement of benzyl bromide, and the data followed pseudo-first order, irreversible kinetics. The catalyst amounts ranged from 0.06 (solubility limit) to 10% of the limiting reactant, benzyl chloride. [Pg.401]

Equilibrium thermodynamics is one of the pillars supporting the safety analyses of radioactive waste repositories. Thermodynamic constants are used for modelling reference porewaters, calculating radionuclide solubility limits, deriving case-specific sorption coefficients, and analysing experimental results. It is essential to use the same data base in all instances of the modelling chain in order to ensure internally consistent results. [Pg.561]

In general, the biological evaluation of hypericin in various test models is limited by its poor water solubility. It was shown in in vitro as well as in vivo studies (18,78) that the water solubility of hypericin was remarkably enhanced in the presence of procyanidins or flavonol glycosides of SJW extract. In a recent pharmacokinetic study in rats, it was shown that procyanidin B2 as well as hyperoside increased the oral bioavailability of hypericin by approximately 58% (B2) and 34% (hyperoside) (Fig. 5) (19). Procyanidin B2 and hyperoside had a different influence on the plasma kinetics of hypericin median maximal plasma levels of hypericin were detected after 360 minutes (Cmav 8.6 ng/mL) for B2, and after 150 minutes... [Pg.218]

Point Defect Generation During Phosphorus Diffusion. At Concentrations above the Solid Solubility Limit. The mechanism for the diffusion of phosphorus in silicon is still a subject of interest. Hu et al. (46) reviewed the models of phosphorus diffusion in silicon and proposed a dual va-cancy-interstitialcy mechanism. This mechanism was previously applied by Hu (38) to explain oxidation-enhanced diffusion. Harris and Antoniadis (47) studied silicon self-interstitial supersaturation during phosphorus diffusion and observed an enhanced diffusion of the arsenic buried layer under the phosphorus diffusion layer and a retarded diffusion of the antimony buried layer. From these results they concluded that during the diffusion of predeposited phosphorus, the concentration of silicon self-interstitials was enhanced and the vacancy concentration was reduced. They ruled out the possibility that the increase in the concentration of silicon self-interstitials was due to the oxidation of silicon, which was concurrent with the phosphorus predeposition process. [Pg.300]

A distinguishing effect of flow rate is that saturation of the solution is never achieved under dynamic leaching conditions. Thus, network dissolution, a solubility limited process, is never allowed to halt. A steady-state condition is eventually established whereby leach rates of network formers equalize the rate of removal of species from the leachant due to the flowing solution. This can be illustrated by formulating a network dissolution model which incorporates the dependence of leaching of network formers on solubility limits and water flow rates. [Pg.337]

Accurate self-consistent thermochemical data for the copper chlorides up to 200°C are required, in order to improve solubility calculations and electrochemical modelling capabilities for Aspen Plus and OLI software. Experimental work has been initiated at the University of Guelph, Canada and UOIT to determine a comprehensive thermochemical database, for solubility limits of OMIT, and aqueous cupric chloride versus chloride concentration and temperature using UV-VIS spectroscopy (Suppiah, 2008). The chloride ion is obtained by adding LiCl OMIT. The conditions of tests are primarily 25-200°C, up to 20 bars. Specialised equipment for this task is needed to reach elevated temperatures and pressures, because cupric chloride is chemically aggressive, and because changes in the solution concentrations must be made precisely. A titanium test cell has been custom made, including a UV-VIS spectrometer with sapphire windows, HPLC pumps and an automated injection system. The data acquired will be combined with past literature data for the cuprous chloride system to develop a self-consistent database for the copper (I) and copper (II) chloride-water systems. [Pg.231]

The contaminant transport model, Eq. (28), was solved using the backwards in time alternating direction implicit (ADI) finite difference scheme subject to a zero dispersive flux boundary condition applied to all outer boundaries of the numerical domain with the exception of the NAPL-water interface where concentrations were kept constant at the 1,1,2-TCA solubility limit Cs. The ground-water model, Eq. (31), was solved using an implicit finite difference scheme subject to constant head boundaries on the left and right of the numerical domain, and no-flux boundary conditions for the top and bottom boundaries, corresponding to the confining layer and impermeable bedrock, respectively, as... [Pg.110]

Some attempts are being made to model the supercritical extraction of natural products. Most of the models proposed consider the rate of extraction determined by the rate of mass transfer out of the matrix the solute is present in small amounts in the matrix, and during extraction the concentration of the solute in the supercritical fluid is well below the solubility limit (Brunner, 1984 Bartle et al, 1990 Reverchon et al, 1993 and Catchpole et al, 1994). [Pg.526]

Results obtained with the theoretical mod-el described above appear to be quite reasonable. An important assumption contained in the model is Assumption 4 hydrogen concentration in carbon steel is solubility limited. A necessary result of this assumption is a discontinuity in concentration gradient at the SS/CS interlace (illustrated in the figure at the beginning of this Appendix). [Pg.169]


See other pages where Modelling solubility limits is mentioned: [Pg.223]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.966]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



Model limitations

Modeling limitations

Solubility limitations

Solubility limits

Solubility model

Solubility modeling

© 2024 chempedia.info