Testing of models

Wheatley, C.J., et al., 1988, Comparison and Test of Model for Atmospheric Dispersion of Continuous Releases of Chlorine, SRD Report R438, UKAEA, July. ... 

Test of Model Adequacy. The final step is to test the adequacy of the model. Figure 4 is a plot of the residual errors from the model vs. the observed values. The residuals are the differences between the observed and predicted values. Random scatter about a zero mean is desireable. 

Statistical testing of model adequacy and significance of parameter estimates is a very important part of kinetic modelling. Only those models with a positive evaluation in statistical analysis should be applied in reactor scale-up. The statistical analysis presented below is restricted to linear regression and normal or Gaussian distribution of experimental errors. If the experimental error has a zero mean, constant variance and is independently distributed, its variance can be evaluated by dividing SSres by the number of degrees of freedom, i.e. 

The measurement of spatial gradients around roots at a resolution sufficient to provide an acceptable test of model predictions is very challenging and few studies have attempted it. Figure 7 shows the measured and predicted depletion of K for 4-day-old rape seedlings grown as a planar mat in contact with a column... 

The process of field validation and testing of models was presented at the Pellston conference as a systematic analysis of errors (6. In any model calibration, verification or validation effort, the model user is continually faced with the need to analyze and explain differences (i.e., errors, in this discussion) between observed data and model predictions. This requires assessments of the accuracy and validity of observed model input data, parameter values, system representation, and observed output data. Figure 2 schematically compares the model and the natural system with regard to inputs, outputs, and sources of error. Clearly there are possible errors associated with each of the categories noted above, i.e., input, parameters, system representation, output. Differences in each of these categories can have dramatic impacts on the conclusions of the model validation process. 

Hill, G. E. 1994. Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch A comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 5 64-73. 

On the basis of different assumptions about the nature of the fluid and solid flow within each phase and between phases as well as about the extent of mixing within each phase, it is possible to develop many different mathematical models of the two phase type. Pyle (119), Rowe (120), and Grace (121) have critically reviewed models of these types. Treatment of these models is clearly beyond the scope of this text. In many cases insufficient data exist to provide critical tests of model validity. This situation is especially true of large scale reactors that are the systems of greatest interest from industry s point of view. The student should understand, however, that there is an ongoing effort to develop mathematical models of fluidized bed reactors that will be useful for design purposes. Our current... 

The several modeling methods discussed in the accompanying sections are quite useful in testing the ability of a model to fit a particular set of data. These methods do not, however, supplant the more conventional tests of model adequacy of classical statistical theory, i.e., the analysis of variance and tests of residuals. 

Figure 30 portrays the grid of values of the independent variables over which values of D were calculated to choose experimental points after the initial nine. The additional five points chosen are also shown in Fig. 30. Note that points at high hydrogen and low propylene partial pressures are required. Figure 31 shows the posterior probabilities associated with each model. The acceptability of model 2 declines rapidly as data are taken according to the model-discrimination design. If, in addition, model 2 cannot pass standard lack-of-fit tests, residual plots, and other tests of model adequacy, then it should be rejected. Similarly, model 1 should be shown to remain adequate after these tests. Many more data points than these 14 have shown less conclusive results, when this procedure is not used for this experimental system.

Can the software be run off-line, to allow piloting/testing of models before deployment ... 

This section provides an introduction to a variety of approaches for assessing significance. For historical reasons, some methods such as cross-validation and independent testing of models are best described in the chapters on multivariate methods (see Chapters 4 and 5), although the chemometrician should have a broad appreciation of all such approaches and not be restricted to any one set of methods. 

A number of interesting consistency tests of models for ET kinetics and D/A coupling are provided by available thermal and optical data. 

Finally, although we are not going to discuss them here, we mention the connection of the potential with properties of solid phases, such as lattice energy, compressibility, heat capacity that also are helpful in the development and testing of model potentials [55]. 

Molecular beams are limited to reactions that are carried out in vacuum, where well-defined beams of reactant molecules can be prepared. This limits their application to gas-phase reactions and to reactions of gaseous molecules with solid surfaces. Molecular beam methods cannot be used to study kinetics in liquid solvents. The detailed information they provide for gas-gas and gas-surface reactions allows precise testing of models and theories for the dynamics of these classes of reactions. 

Nonlinear Models in Parameters, Single Reaction In practice, the parameters appear often in nonlinear form in the rate expressions, requiring nonlinear regression. Nonlinear regression does not guarantee optimal parameter estimates even if the kinetic model adequately represents the true kinetics and the data width is adequate. Further, the statistical tests of model adequacy apply rigorously only to models linear in parameters, and can only be considered approximate for nonlinear models. 

Mack, G.H. Madoff, R.D. (2005) A test of models of alluvial architecture and palaeosol development Camp Rice Formation (Upper Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene), southern Rio Grande rift, New Mexico, USA. Sedimentology 52, 191-211. 

The methods by which the mechanistic chemist goes about finding satisfactory explanations are much like those of other scientists. The construction and testing of models is an integral part of the enterprise. However, as I have tried to show in this essay, those models can become so well integrated that one forgets their existence and, hence, their underlying approximations. When that happens, the result can be that one... 

The proposed model represents a first step in the development of a corrosion model for galvanized steel. To validate the model, detailed testing of model predictions versus results of field exposure studies is required. Such an effort is presently being... 

---