Methyl methacrylate , hydrophobic

J.N. Shen, C.C. Yu, H.M. Ruan, C.J. Gao, B. van der Bruggen. Preparation and characterization of thin-fikn nanocomposite membranes embedded with poly(methyl methacrylate) hydrophobic modified multiwaUed carbon nanotubes by interfacial polymerization. Journal of Membrane Science 442 (2013) 18-26. 

Mixtures of polymers at surfaces provide the interesting possibility of exploring polymer miscibility in two dimensions. Baglioni and co-workers [17] have shown that polymers having the same orientation at the interface are compatible while those having different orientations are not. Some polymers have their hydrophobic portions parallel to the surface, while others have a perpendicular disposition. The surface orientation effect is also present in mixtures of poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA, and fatty acids. 

The Smith-Ewart expression (eq. 1) accurately predicts the particle number for hydrophobic monomers like styrene and butadiene (21), but fails to predict the particle number (22) for more hydrophilic monomers like methyl methacrylate and vinyl acetate. A new theory based on homogeneous particle... 

Hard lenses can be defined as plastic lenses that contain no water, have moduli in excess of 5 MPa (500 g/mm ), and have T well above the temperature of the ocular environment. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) has excellent optical and mechanical properties and scratch resistance and was the first and only plastic used as a hard lens material before higher oxygen-permeable materials were developed. PMMA lenses also show excellent wetting in the ocular environment even though they are hydrophobic, eg, the contact angle is 66°. 

Mechanical properties of a hydrogel lens also are affected by the use of a hydrophobic monomer, such as a low alkyl methacrylate. This is particularly important when the water content of the hydrogel lens is very high. The use of these methacrylates helps preserve the required mechanical strength. Methyl methacrylate [80-62-6] (MMA) (I2I), isobutyl methacrylate [97-86-9] (122), and / -pentyl methacrylate [2849-98-1] (123) all have been used for this purpose. 

When the polymer was prepared by the suspension polymerization technique, the product was crosslinked beads of unusually uniform size (see Fig. 16 for SEM picture of the beads) with hydrophobic surface characteristics. This shows that cardanyl acrylate/methacry-late can be used as comonomers-cum-cross-linking agents in vinyl polymerizations. This further gives rise to more opportunities to prepare polymer supports for synthesis particularly for experiments in solid-state peptide synthesis. Polymer supports based on activated acrylates have recently been reported to be useful in supported organic reactions, metal ion separation, etc. [198,199]. Copolymers are expected to give better performance and, hence, coplymers of CA and CM A with methyl methacrylate (MMA), styrene (St), and acrylonitrile (AN) were prepared and characterized [196,197]. 

Although the potassium superoxide route can be universally applied to various alkyl methacrylates, it is experimentally more difficult than simple acid hydrolysis. In addition, limited yields do not permit well-defined hydrophobic-hydrophilic blocks. On the other hand, acid catalyzed hydrolysis is limited to only a few esters such as TBMA, but yields of carboxylate are quantitative. Hydrolysis attempts of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(isopropyl methacrylate) (PIPMA) do not yield an observable amount of conversion to the carboxylic acid under the established conditions for poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PTBMA). This allows for selective hydrolysis of all-acrylic block copolymers. 

Hard contact lenses are composed of a polymer that repels water because the constituent repeating units (the monomers that link together to form the polymer) are nonpolar, hydrophobic segments. The first hard contact lens was constructed in 1948 from the monomer known as methyl methacrylate (MMA), yielding the polymer poly(methyl methacrylate) or PMMA. This material offers durability, optical transparency, and acceptable wettability for optimal comfort. Today the rigid lens material of hard contact lenses is often constructed by combining MMA with one or more additional hydrophobic monomers to provide better gas permeability. 

Cross-linked polymeric materials with optical transparency and biocompatibility are used to construct hard contact lenses. The monomers commonly used in hard contact lenses possess a high degree of hydrophobicity due to their inability to form hydrogen bonds with water. The ester methyl methacrylate (MMA) (Fig. 14.6.1), CH2C(CH3)COOCH3, was the first monomeric unit used in 1948. 

Another way for covalent immobilisation is to synthesise indicator chemistry with polymerizable entities such as methacrylate groups (Figure 4). These groups can then be copolymerized with monomers such as hydrophobic methyl methacrylate or hydrophilic acryl amide to give sensor copolymers. In order to obtain self-plasticized materials, methacrylate monomers with long alkyl chains (hexyl or dodecyl methacrylate) can be used. Thus, sensor copolymers are obtained which have a Tg below room temperature. Similarly, ionophores and ionic additives (quaternary ammonium ions and borates) can be derivatised to give methacrylate derivatives. 

These dyes have affinity for one or, usually, more types of hydrophobic fibre and they are normally applied by exhaustion from fine aqueous dispersion. Although pure disperse dyes have extremely low solubility in cold water, such dyes nevertheless do dissolve to a limited extent in aqueous surfactant solutions at typical dyeing temperatures. The fibre is believed to sorb dye from this dilute aqueous solution phase, which is continuously replenished by rapid dissolution of particles from suspension. Alternatively, hydrophobic fibres can absorb disperse dyes from the vapour phase. This mechanism is the basis of many continuous dyeing and printing methods of application of these dyes. The requirements and limitations of disperse dyes on cellulose acetate, triacetate, polyester, nylon and other synthetic fibres will be discussed more fully in Chapter 3. Similar products have been employed in the surface coloration of certain thermoplastics, including cellulose acetate, poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene. 

TiCU readily functionalizes hydrophilic polymers such as poly(vinyl alcohol), m-ciesol novolac and methacrylic acid copolymers as well as moderately hydrophobic polymers such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(benzyl methacrylate) and fully acetylated m-cresol novolac. HCI4 did not react with poly(styrene) to form etch resistant films indicating that very hydrophobic films follow a different reaction pathway. RBS analysis revealed that Ti is present only on the surface of hydrophilic and moderately hydrophobic polymer films, whereas it was found diffused through the entire thickness of the poly(styrene) films. The reaction pathways of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers with HCI4 are different because TiCl is hydrolysed by the surface water at the hydrophilic polymer surfaces to form an etch resistant T1O2 layer. Lack of such surface water in hydrophobic polymers explains the absence of a surface TiC>2 layer and the poor etching selectivities. 

Avseenko et al. (2001) immobilized antigens onto aluminum-coated Mylar films by electrospray (ES) deposition. Various surface modifications of the metallized films were studied to determine their abilities to enhance sensitivity. The plastic surfaces were firsf cleaned by plasma discharge treatment, followed by coating with proteins (BSA and casein) or polymers such as poly (methyl methacrylate) or oxidized dextran, or they were exposed to dichlorodimethyl silane to create hydrophobic surfaces. Protein antigen was prepared in 10-fold excess sucrose and sprayed onto the surfaces to form arrays with spot diameters between 7 and 15 pm containing 1 to 4 pg protein. 

PMMA Poly(methyl methacrylate) (7H, R6hm) Co-hydrophob... 

Several methodologies for preparation of monodisperse polymer particles are known [1]. Among them, dispersion polymerization in polar media has often been used because of the versatility and simplicity of the process. So far, the dispersion polymerizations and copolymerizations of hydrophobic classical monomers such as styrene (St), methyl methacrylate (MMA), etc., have been extensively investigated, in which the kinetic, molecular weight and colloidal parameters could be controlled by reaction conditions [6]. The preparation of monodisperse polymer particles in the range 1-20 pm is particularly challenging because it is just between the limits of particle size of conventional emulsion polymerization (100-700 nm) and suspension polymerization (20-1000 pm). 

Inoue, T., G. Chen, K. Nakamae, and A. S. Hoffman. 1998. An AB block copolymer of oligo(methyl methacrylate) and poly(acrylic acid) for micellar delivery of hydrophobic drilgSontrol. Rel.51 ... 

The bioadhesive properties of hydrophobic polybasic gels containing ACV-dimethylami-noethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate were investigated in view of their use as vaginal drug delivery systems [72]. The bioadhesive properties of such gels make them suitable for site-specific and pH-controlled drug delivery. 

---