Mathematical models table

MATHEMATICAL MODELS TABLE 10.11 Intercompartment Transfer Processes... 

A series of monographs and correlation tables exist for the interpretation of vibrational spectra [52-55]. However, the relationship of frequency characteristics and structural features is rather complicated and the number of known correlations between IR spectra and structures is very large. In many cases, it is almost impossible to analyze a molecular structure without the aid of computational techniques. Existing approaches are mainly based on the interpretation of vibrational spectra by mathematical models, rule sets, and decision trees or fuzzy logic approaches. 

The effect of the disturbance on the controlled variable These models can be based on steady-state or dynamic analysis. The performance of the feedforward controller depends on the accuracy of both models. If the models are exac t, then feedforward control offers the potential of perfect control (i.e., holding the controlled variable precisely at the set point at all times because of the abihty to predict the appropriate control ac tion). However, since most mathematical models are only approximate and since not all disturbances are measurable, it is standara prac tice to utilize feedforward control in conjunction with feedback control. Table 8-5 lists the relative advantages and disadvantages of feedforward and feedback control. By combining the two control methods, the strengths of both schemes can be utilized. 

No single method or algorithm of optimization exists that can be apphed efficiently to all problems. The method chosen for any particular case will depend primarily on (I) the character of the objective function, (2) the nature of the constraints, and (3) the number of independent and dependent variables. Table 8-6 summarizes the six general steps for the analysis and solution of optimization problems (Edgar and Himmelblau, Optimization of Chemical Processes, McGraw-HiU, New York, 1988). You do not have to follow the cited order exac tly, but vou should cover all of the steps eventually. Shortcuts in the procedure are allowable, and the easy steps can be performed first. Steps I, 2, and 3 deal with the mathematical definition of the problem ideutificatiou of variables and specification of the objective function and statement of the constraints. If the process to be optimized is very complex, it may be necessaiy to reformulate the problem so that it can be solved with reasonable effort. Later in this section, we discuss the development of mathematical models for the process and the objec tive function (the economic model). 

The MSF model (NUREG/CR-3837) is used principally to determine the level of dependence between safety systems introduced by maintenance, testing, and calibration activities. It is a mathematical model which modifies the independent failure probability of any single component by considering that a component with which it is redundant has already failed. This allows the conditional failure probabilities of redundant components to be calculated to determine the overall system failure probability. Documentation requirements are given in Table 4.5-6. 

Agenda 6 The last agenda consists of a team review and approval of a write-up that documents the final test design The documentation must Include the consensus factorial table, hierarchical tree, and mathematical model used to fit the predicted values In addition, the documentation must Include all basic arguments and considerations, even if these considerations do not appear in explicit form in the final design The specific reasons for excluding certain test... 

Factorial tables, hierarchical trees, and associated mathematical models are elementary tools used to guide the efforts of the design team ... 

Mathematical Models. As noted previously, a mathematical model must be fitted to the predicted results shown In each factorial table generated by each scientist. Ideally, each scientist selects and fits an appropriate model based upon theoretical constraints and physical principles. In some cases, however, appropriate models are unknown to the scientists. This Is likely to occur for experiments Involving multifactor, multidisciplinary systems. When this occurs, various standard models have been used to describe the predicted results shown In the factorial tables. For example, for effects associated with lognormal distributions a multiplicative model has been found useful. As a default model, the team statistician can fit a polynomial model using standard least square techniques. Although of limited use for Interpolation or extrapolation, a polynomial model can serve to Identify certain problems Involving the relationships among the factors as Implied by the values shown In the factorial tables. 

The form of the mathematical model fitted to the consensus factorial table must be reassessed after the hierarchical tree Is pruned and the experimental design has been revised by the statistician. 

A survey of the mathematical models for typical chemical reactors and reactions shows that several hydrodynamic and transfer coefficients (model parameters) must be known to simulate reactor behaviour. These model parameters are listed in Table 5.4-6 (see also Table 5.4-1 in Section 5.4.1). Regions of interfacial surface area for various gas-liquid reactors are shown in Fig. 5.4-15. Many correlations for transfer coefficients have been published in the literature (see the list of books and review papers at the beginning of this section). The coefficients can be evaluated from those correlations within an average accuracy of about 25%. This is usually sufficient for modelling of chemical reactors. Mathematical models of reactors arc often more sensitive to kinetic parameters. Experimental methods and procedures for parameters estimation are discussed in the subsequent section. 

In fine chemistry, mathematical models are scarce yet. However, even gross kinetics provides a lot of information on the influence of the mode of operation on seleetivity. In general, semi-quantitative criteria are used in preliminary reactor selection. They are mainly based mainly on operational characteristics, experience, and a rough economic estimation. Factors affecting the choice of the reactor and mode of operation are listed in Table 5.4-42. 

Finally, mention should be made of the two effects of interaction of the mathematical model whose negative coefficients show minima of flashpoints for the binary butanol/cyclohexanol and butanol/pentanol combinations. Can they be explained by the presence of azeotropes in these substances The tables examined did not list these mixtures and there was no time to do an experimental check with the students. 

Let us reconsider the hydrogenation of 3-hydroxypropanal (HPA) to 1,3-propanediol (PD) over Ni/Si02/Al203 catalyst powder that used as an example earlier. For the same mathematical model of the system you are asked to regress simultaneously the data provided in Table 16.23 as well as the additional data given here in Table 16.28 for experiments performed at 60°C (333 K) and 80°C (353 K). Obviously an Arrhenius type relationship must be used in this case. Zhu et al. (1997) reported parameters for the above conditions and they are shown in Table 16.28. 

Table 20.3 lists the reversible and irreversible processes that may be significant in the deep-well environment.3 The characteristics of the specific wastes and the environmental factors present in a well strongly influence which processes will occur and whether they will be irreversible. Irreversible reactions are particularly important. Waste rendered nontoxic through irreversible reactions may be considered permanently transformed into a nonhazardous state. A systematic discussion of mathematical modeling of groundwater chemical transport by reaction type is provided by Rubin.30... 

Alternative mechanisms have been recently proposed [78,79] based on a kinetic investigation of NO reduction by n-octane under isothermal (200°C) and steady-state conditions in the presence of H2. The authors built up a mathematical model based on supposed reaction pathways, which account for molecular adsorption of NO and CO and dissociative ones for H2 and 02. The elementary steps, which have been considered for modelling their results are reported in Table 10.3. Interesting kinetic information can be provided by the examination of this mechanism scheme in particular the fast bimolecular... 

The mathematical model describing the two-phase dynamic system consists of modeling of the flow and description of its boundary conditions. The description of the flow is based on the conservation equations as well as constitutive laws. The latter define the properties of the system with a certain degree of idealization, simplification, or empiricism, such as equation of state, steam table, friction, and heat transfer correlations (see Sec. 3.4). A typical set of six conservation equations is discussed by Boure (1975), together with the number and nature of the necessary constitutive laws. With only a few general assumptions, these equations can be written, for a one-dimensional (z) flow of constant cross section, without injection or suction at the wall, as follows. 

In this section, the above mathematical model is applied to a literature example shown in Fig. 2.2 (Ierapetritou and Floudas, 1998). The SSN representation is given in Fig. 2.3b. Table 2.1 gives data for this example. 5 time points and a 12-h time horizon were used. Using less time points leads to a suboptimal solution with an objective value of 50, and using more time points than 5 did not improve the solution. It is worthy of note that, in this particular example, constraint (2.13) is redundant as mentioned earlier, since each unit is only performing one task. 

Table 4.4 is the summary of the mathematical model and the results obtained for the case study. The model for scenario 1 involves 637 constraints, 245 continuous and 42 binary variables. Seventy nodes were explored in the branch and bound algorithm. The model was solved in 1.61 CPU seconds, yielding an objective value (profit) of 1.61 million over the time horizon of interest, i.e. 6 h. This objective is concomitant with the production of 850 t of product and utilization of 210 t of freshwater. Ignoring any possibility for water reuse/recycle, whilst targeting the same product quantity would result in 390 t of freshwater utilization. Therefore, exploitation of water reuse/recycle opportunities results in more than 46% savings in freshwater utilization, in the absence of central reusable water storage. The water network to achieve the target is shown in Fig. 4.14. 

Table I. Relative Collision Efficiencies Estimated from Fitting the Mathematical Model to Experimental Data ...

In some cases a variable can be independent and in others the same variable can be dependent, but the usual independent variables are pressure, temperature, and flow rate or concentration of a feed. We cannot provide examples for all of these criteria, but have selected a few to show how they mesh with the optimization methods described in earlier chapters and mathematical models listed in Table 14.1. 

The dominant transport process from water is volatilization. Based on mathematical models developed by the EPA, the half-life for M-hexane in bodies of water with any degree of turbulent mixing (e.g., rivers) would be less than 3 hours. For standing bodies of water (e.g., small ponds), a half-life no longer than one week (6.8 days) is estimated (ASTER 1995 EPA 1987a). Based on the log octanol/water partition coefficient (i.e., log[Kow]) and the estimated log sorption coefficient (i.e., log[Koc]) (see Table 3-2), ii-hexane is not expected to become concentrated in biota (Swann et al. 1983). A calculated bioconcentration factor (BCF) of 453 for a fathead minnow (ASTER 1995) further suggests a low potential for -hcxanc to bioconcentrate or bioaccumulate in trophic food chains. 

---