Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial surface areas

Volatilization — Volatilization is a physico-chemical phenomenon of particular interest to environmental managers as well as safety managers. It is the tendency of a material to transfer from a liquid phase (either pure or dissolved as in aqueous systems) to a gaseous phase (commonly air). The volatilization, or evaporation as it is more commonly called, is controlled by a number of factors, the most important of which are the vapor pressure of the material, temperature (vapor pressure increases with temperature), and air/material interfacial surface area, and the action of active mass transfer agents such as wind. [Pg.163]

Aluminum foam can be used as a porous medium in the model of a heat sink with inner heat generation (Hetsroni et al. 2006a). Open-cell metal foam has a good effective thermal conductivity and a high specific solid-fluid interfacial surface area. [Pg.87]

The rates of multiphase reactions are often controlled by mass tran.sfer across the interface. An enlargement of the interfacial surface area can then speed up reactions and also affect selectivity. Formation of micelles (these are aggregates of surfactants, typically 400-800 nm in size, which can solubilize large quantities of hydrophobic substance) can lead to an enormous increase of the interfacial area, even at low concentrations. A qualitatively similar effect can be reached if microemulsions or hydrotropes are created. Microemulsions are colloidal dispersions that consist of monodisperse droplets of water-in-oil or oil-in-water, which are thermodynamically stable. Typically, droplets are 10 to 100 pm in diameter. Hydrotropes are substances like toluene/xylene/cumene sulphonic acids or their Na/K salts, glycol.s, urea, etc. These. substances are highly soluble in water and enormously increase the solubility of sparingly. soluble solutes. [Pg.9]

A survey of the mathematical models for typical chemical reactors and reactions shows that several hydrodynamic and transfer coefficients (model parameters) must be known to simulate reactor behaviour. These model parameters are listed in Table 5.4-6 (see also Table 5.4-1 in Section 5.4.1). Regions of interfacial surface area for various gas-liquid reactors are shown in Fig. 5.4-15. Many correlations for transfer coefficients have been published in the literature (see the list of books and review papers at the beginning of this section). The coefficients can be evaluated from those correlations within an average accuracy of about 25%. This is usually sufficient for modelling of chemical reactors. Mathematical models of reactors arc often more sensitive to kinetic parameters. Experimental methods and procedures for parameters estimation are discussed in the subsequent section. [Pg.288]

Contimious liquid extraction techniques are used when the sample volume is large, the distribution constant is small, or the rate of extraction is slow. The efficiency of extraction depends on many factors including the viscosity of the phases, the magnitude of the distribution constant, the relative phase volumes, the interfacial surface area, and the relative velocity of the phases. Numerous continuous extractors using llghter-than-water and heavier-than-water solvents vee been described [3,2 7,42,73,74]. Generally, either the ligi Pr or heavier density... [Pg.385]

Lm = molar liquid flow-rate per unit cross-sectional area, a = interfacial surface area per unit volume,... [Pg.594]

The surface of PSs is determined as an interface between the condensed phase and the space of the pores. For catalysts with supported active components textural characteristics of individual phases are important, including their accessible, surface areas and the interfacial surface areas [5,6],... [Pg.259]

The number of cross bars, parallel bars, and elements will affect the performance of an SMX static mixer. Singh at al. [62] performed simulations of the two-component flow through an SMX mixer. The number of cross bars and the number of elements were varied, and the results are shown in Fig. 8.35. Contrary to intuition, which would tend toward the most bars to get optimum mixing, the optimum was shown to be six cross bars in the channel. Moreover, after only four elements the number of striations and thus the interfacial surface area was extremely high such that the black and white patterns are becoming difficult to see. [Pg.371]

These highly porous glasses retain a rigid and exposed interfacial surface area (typically 300-1000 m g ), whereas conventional organic polymer beads swell and shrink in different solvents, often with unpredictable effects on catalysis Functionalization of a monolithic (largest dimension 1 mm) gel affords a bulk catalyst sample. This obviates the need for filtration to recover the catalyst tweezers can be used instead ... [Pg.490]

The specific interfacial surface area, S, defined as the ratio of interfacial surface area. A, to thl volume, V, is calculated from the value of correlation distance obtained by plotting the scattered intensity in the Debye fashion [ 12,38]. [Pg.278]

Table III shows the result of SANS analysis on fully polymerized PB/PS IPN s, seml-IPN s, and chemical blends by Fernandez et al. [ n.] The specific interfacial surface area was shown to increase with Increasing crosslink density, S decreasing in the order full-IPN s, semi-I IPN s, seml-II IPN s afid chemical blends, as expected from many earlier studies. Its value ranges from 20 to 200 m /gm, in the range of true colloids. This result is particularly important because interfacial surface area is closely related to toughness and impact strength. Table III shows the result of SANS analysis on fully polymerized PB/PS IPN s, seml-IPN s, and chemical blends by Fernandez et al. [ n.] The specific interfacial surface area was shown to increase with Increasing crosslink density, S decreasing in the order full-IPN s, semi-I IPN s, seml-II IPN s afid chemical blends, as expected from many earlier studies. Its value ranges from 20 to 200 m /gm, in the range of true colloids. This result is particularly important because interfacial surface area is closely related to toughness and impact strength.
The number of polymer particles is the prime determinant of the rate and degree of polymerization since it appears as the first power in both Eqs. 4-5 and 4-7. The formation (and stabilization) of polymer particles by both micellar nucleation and homogeneous nucleation involves the adsorption of surfactant from the micelles, solution, and monomer droplets. The number of polymer particles that can be stabilized is dependent on the total surface area of surfactant present in the system asS, where as is the interfacial surface area occupied by a surfactant molecule and S is the total concentration of surfactant in the system (micelles, solution, monomer droplets). However, N is also directly dependent on the rate of radical generation. The quantitative dependence of N on asS and R,- has been derived as... [Pg.362]

In a bioreactor, one is interested in the transfer per unit of volume of reactor, called Kia or the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient, a is the interfacial surface area per unit of volume of liquid. In a perfectly mixed tank, C has identical values at any point and C depends on the conditions in the gas phase at the outlet of the reactor. Several authors [60] consider that a better estimate of the driving force is given by the logarithmic mean concentration difference between the entry and the exit of gas. [Pg.590]

Note that in the definition of Kia, the interfacial surface area is in general based on the liquid volume. This definition is consistent with the material balances in the reactor and in particular the gas-phase balances. However, in correlations published for Kia values, most authors use a specific area Ud based on the total volume of the gas-liquid dispersion (24.12). Ud and a are connected via the gas holdup s ... [Pg.591]

Regime 5 - instantaneous reactions at an reaction plane developing inside the film For very high reaction rates and/or (very) low mass transfer rates, ozone reacts immediately at the surface of the bubbles. The reaction is no longer dependent on ozone transfer through the liquid film kL or the reaction constant kD, but rather on the specific interfacial surface area a and the gas phase concentration. Here the resistance in the gas phase may be important. For lower c(M) the reaction plane is within the liquid film and both film transfer coefficients as well as a can play a role. The enhancement factor can increase to a high value E > > 3. [Pg.91]

As noted, two principles of heat transfer are involved evaporation and convection. The rate of heat transfer by both convection and evaporation increases with an increase in air-to-water interfacial surface, relative velocity, contact time and temperature differential. Packing and fill in a tower serve to increase the interfacial surface area the tower chimney or fans create the relative air-to-water velocity and contact time is a function of tower size. These three factors all may be influenced by the tower design. [Pg.5]


See other pages where Interfacial surface areas is mentioned: [Pg.430]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.1521]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.139]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.337 , Pg.348 , Pg.368 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.130 ]




SEARCH



Interfacial area

© 2024 chempedia.info