Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Material properties hardness

In the batch represented in Fig. 6, a novice operator trainee has stopped the batch well before the peak of the derivative. This required a major adjustment of the tableting operation (force and speed) to produce tablets in an acceptable range of material properties (hardness and friability). [Pg.4083]

The radiation and temperature dependent mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials (modulus and loss) are of great interest throughout the plastics, polymer, and rubber from initial design to routine production. There are a number of laboratory research instruments are available to determine these properties. All these hardness tests conducted on polymeric materials involve the penetration of the sample under consideration by loaded spheres or other geometric shapes [1]. Most of these tests are to some extent arbitrary because the penetration of an indenter into viscoelastic material increases with time. For example, standard durometer test (the "Shore A") is widely used to measure the static "hardness" or resistance to indentation. However, it does not measure basic material properties, and its results depend on the specimen geometry (it is difficult to make available the identity of the initial position of the devices on cylinder or spherical surfaces while measuring) and test conditions, and some arbitrary time must be selected to compare different materials. [Pg.239]

The isotope boron-10 is used as a control for nuclear reactors, as a shield for nuclear radiation, and in instruments used for detecting neutrons. Boron nitride has remarkable properties and can be used to make a material as hard as diamond. The nitride also behaves like an electrical insulator but conducts heat like a metal. [Pg.14]

An interesting example of a large specific surface which is wholly external in nature is provided by a dispersed aerosol composed of fine particles free of cracks and fissures. As soon as the aerosol settles out, of course, its particles come into contact with one another and form aggregates but if the particles are spherical, more particularly if the material is hard, the particle-to-particle contacts will be very small in area the interparticulate junctions will then be so weak that many of them will become broken apart during mechanical handling, or be prized open by the film of adsorbate during an adsorption experiment. In favourable cases the flocculated specimen may have so open a structure that it behaves, as far as its adsorptive properties are concerned, as a completely non-porous material. Solids of this kind are of importance because of their relevance to standard adsorption isotherms (cf. Section 2.12) which play a fundamental role in procedures for the evaluation of specific surface area and pore size distribution by adsorption methods. [Pg.24]

Below Tg the material is hard and rigid with a coefficient of thermal expansion equal to roughly half that of the liquid. With respect to mechanical properties, the glass is closer in behavior to a crystalline solid than to a... [Pg.202]

Hardness. The hardness (qv), or related property abrasiveness, is an important filler property. Hardness is determined by comparison to materials of known hardness on the Mohs scale. On this nonlinear scale, diamond is rated 10, quartz 7, calcite 3, and talc 1. The abrasiveness of a filler is also dependent on psd and the presence of impurities, eg, ka olin clay (Mohs hardness of 3) can be quite abrasive because of the presence of quartz impurities. [Pg.368]

Despite variatioas ia hardness test procedures and the variations ia physical properties of the materials tested, hardness conversions from one test to another are possible (see ASTM E140 and Table 2). This approximate relationship is only consistent within a single-material system, eg, iron, steel, or aluminum. [Pg.467]

Wear. Ceramics generally exhibit excellent wear properties. Wear is deterrnined by a ceramic s friction and adhesion behavior, and occurs by two mechanisms adhesive wear and abrasive wear (43). Adhesive wear occurs when interfacial adhesion produces a localized Kj when the body on one side of the interface is moved relative to the other. If the strength of either of the materials is lower than the interfacial shear strength, fracture occurs. Lubricants (see Lubricants and lubrication) minimize adhesion between adj acent surfaces by providing an interlayer that shears easily. Abrasive wear occurs when one material is softer than the other. Particles originating in the harder material are introduced into the interface between the two materials and plow into and remove material from the softer material (52). Hard particles from extrinsic sources can also cause abrasive wear, and wear may occur in both of the materials depending on the hardness of the particle. [Pg.326]

No particular contact lens type or product is considered universally superior. In some regions of the world hard lenses dominate the market, eg, some European countries and Japan in other regions, eg. North America and Scandinavia, soft lenses dominate. Contact lens practitioners select their preferred type of lens using criteria other than just lens material properties. However, among soft lenses, HEMA-based lenses are prescribed most often, and among hard lenses, siUcone—acrylate RGP lenses are most common. [Pg.99]

FIG. 20-75 Fluid-bed erosion or wear rate as a function of granule material properties. Kq is fracture toughness and H is hardness as measured hy three-point bend tests. [Ennis [Pg.1888]

Here M is the moment and Mp the fully-plastic moment of, for instance, a beam P/A is the indentation pressure and H the hardness of, for example, armour plating.) The left-hand side of each of these equations describes the loading conditions the right-hand side is a material property. When the left-hand side (which increases with load) equals the right-hand side (which is fixed), failure occurs. [Pg.140]

The use of Ni-base superalloys as turbine blades in an actual end-use atmosphere produces deterioration of material properties. This deterioration can result from erosion or corrosion. Erosion results from hard particles impinging on the turbine blade and removing material from the blade surface. The particles may enter through the turbine inlet or can be loosened scale deposits from within the combustor. [Pg.418]

Tests for indention under load are performed basically like the ASTM measure the hardness of other materials, such as metals and ceramics. There are at least four popular hardness scales in use. Shore A and Shore D is for soft to relatively hard plastics and elastomers. Barcol is used from the mid-range of Shore D to above it as well as RPs. Rockwell M is used for very hard plastics (Chapter 5, MECHANICAL PROPERTY, Hardness),... [Pg.411]

At sufficiently low strain, most polymer materials exhibit a linear viscoelastic response and, once the appropriate strain amplitude has been determined through a preliminary strain sweep test, valid frequency sweep tests can be performed. Filled mbber compounds however hardly exhibit a linear viscoelastic response when submitted to harmonic strains and the current practice consists in testing such materials at the lowest permitted strain for satisfactory reproducibility an approach that obviously provides apparent material properties, at best. From a fundamental point of view, for instance in terms of material sciences, such measurements have a limited meaning because theoretical relationships that relate material structure to properties have so far been established only in the linear viscoelastic domain. Nevertheless, experience proves that apparent test results can be well reproducible and related to a number of other viscoelastic effects, including certain processing phenomena. [Pg.820]

In conclusion, it may be mentioned that the characterization of the mechanical behaviour of materials has many facets. Different methods of testing pertain to different aspects and conditions. The tensile properties, as determined by the tensile test, correspond to slowly applied single load applications. Rapidly applied and cyclic load applications respectively provide the impact and the fatigue properties. Hardness is an analog of the tensile strength which a tensile test measures. The creep test pertains to mechanical behaviour under long term loading at elevated temperatures. [Pg.31]

In order to enable these fluctuations to occur, the network chains are assumed to be "phantom" in nature i.e. their material properties are dismissed and they act only to exert forces on the junctions to which they are attached. With common networks having tetrafunctional junctions, the results of the two approaches differ by a factor of two. Identical results are only obtained from both theories, when the functionality is infinite. From a practical viewpoint, however, a value of about 20 for f can already be equated to infinity because crosslink densities can hardly be obtained with an accuracy better than 10%. [Pg.310]

A benchmark for hardness is diamond, the hardest known substance. Its nominal hardness is 100 GPa (VHN = 10,000kg/mm2),but methods are known that may make it still harder. Based on this benchmark, materials with hardnesses between 20 and 40 GPa are said to be very hard , while a material with hardness greater than 40 GPa is said to be super-hard . The latter are very rare, and there is no true competitor for diamond. However, some property combinations make particular materials more useful than diamond in some applications. For example, cubic-BN is better for cutting iron-based alloys because it reacts chemically with Fe much less strongly than does the carbon of diamond. Therefore, its wear-rate is substantially less. [Pg.197]

There are several classifications of carbon materials, given in accordance with their different properties. Hard carbon is meant as a carbon... [Pg.284]

A 2D soft-sphere approach was first applied to gas-fluidized beds by Tsuji et al. (1993), where the linear spring-dashpot model—similar to the one presented by Cundall and Strack (1979) was employed. Xu and Yu (1997) independently developed a 2D model of a gas-fluidized bed. However in their simulations, a collision detection algorithm that is normally found in hard-sphere simulations was used to determine the first instant of contact precisely. Based on the model developed by Tsuji et al. (1993), Iwadate and Horio (1998) incorporated van der Waals forces to simulate fluidization of cohesive particles. Kafui et al. (2002) developed a DPM based on the theory of contact mechanics, thereby enabling the collision of the particles to be directly specified in terms of material properties such as friction, elasticity, elasto-plasticity, and auto-adhesion. [Pg.87]


See other pages where Material properties hardness is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.1886]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.1346]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.160]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.286 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Data collection, hard material propertie

Hard magnetic materials properties

© 2024 chempedia.info