Level crossing accidents

Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2002), Level Crossing Accidents Monograph 10. Canberra Conmionwealth Department of Transport and Regional Services. Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2003), Level Crossing Accident Fatalities. 

Independent Transport Safety Regulator. 2011. Level Crossing Accidents in Australia. Transport Safety Bulletin, August. 

Thus, the predictions are 2.6 coUisions per annum, 1.1 derailment per annum, other movement accidents 0.2 per annum (or twice each 10 years), 1600 accidents resulting in commercial risk only each year, 2900 times nothing will happen though the hazard will exist (or in other words the accident will be averted) and 0.00088 level crossing accidents per annum. 

Ministry of Transport (1968) Report of the Public Inquiry into the Accident at Hixon Level Crossing on January 6th (1968), London HMSO. 

The highest train accident related hazardous event is HET-10, passenger train collision with road vehicle on level crossing, at 3.9 equivalent fatalities representing 1.9% of the overall risk on the mainline railway. 

Despite the Lockhigton accident and the independent review by the Stott committee which checked the swing of the pendulum towards barrierless crossings the precepts remain in force. The Level Crossings Act 1983 merely extended the b enefits of level crossing modernisation to places not covered by the earlier piecemeal legislation. 

Accidental exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD in a 1949 explosion in a trichlorophenol plant in Nitro, West Virginia, resulted in an outbreak of severe chloracne. Moses et al. (1984) conducted a cross-sectional survey of workers in this plant in 1979. In reviewing the impact of the accident, the authors indicated that 117 workers had severe chloracne as a result of the explosion however, 111 additional workers were found to have had chloracne prior to the explosion. A cross-sectional study of 226 workers in 1979 indicated that 52% had chloracne which persisted for 26 years, and in 29 subjects it was still present after 30 years. Blood levels were not measured, but the air dust in the plant was suspected to have contained 2,4,5-T contaminated with 6 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD compared to 0.1 ppm in later years. Similarly, high incidences of chloracne were also found in other facilities (Jirasek et al. 1976 May 1973 Poland et al. 1971 Vos et al. 1978). Appearance of chloracne after accidental occupational exposure may be immediate or delayed since workers may not always be removed from the work environment, the duration of exposure and total exposure is difficult to assess. 

Children s Susceptibility. A limited number of human studies have examined health effects of CDDs in children. Data from the Seveso accident suggest that children may be more susceptible to the dermal toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (chloracne), but it is not known if this would be the case for other effects. Follow-up medical surveillance of the Seveso children (including measurement of serum 2,3,7,8-TCDD levels) would provide information on whether childhood exposure would pose a risk when the individual matures and ages. The available human and animal data provide evidence that 2,3,7,8-TCDD can cross the placenta and be transferred to an infant via breast milk. Although information on the developmental toxicity of CDDs in humans is limited, there are extensive animal data that the developing... 

Most of what is known about the toxicity of dioxins in the human comes from individuals exposed incidentally or chronically to higher levels (e.g., industrial accidents or presence in areas sprayed with Agent Orange or other herbicides contaminated with dioxins.). The lowest dose effects are probably associated with thymic atrophy and decreased immune response, chloracne and related skin lesions, and neoplasia (cancer). Dioxins can cross into the placenta to cause developmental and reproductive effects, decreased prenatal growth, and prenatal mortality. 

Experimentation is important at aU levels of control [166]. For manual tasks where the optimization criteria are speed and smoothness, the limits of acceptable adaptation and optimization can only be known from the error experienced when occasionally crossing a limit. Errors are an integral part of maintaining a skill at an optimal level and a necessary part of the feedback loop to achieve this goal. The role of such experimentation in accidents cannot be understood by treating human errors as events in a causal chain separate from the feedback loops in which they operate. 

For example, a pedestrian crosses a road negligently and is hit by a driver who was driving negligently. The pedestrian has contributed to the accident. Another example of contributory negligence is where a plaintiff voluntarily disregards warnings and assumes a certain level of risk. 

Therefore, there are three main types accidents of tank area can trigger a domino effect fire, explosion, and fire—explosion occurred in both cases simultaneously cross. The first accident has devastating effects of thermal radiation, and other physical effects like overpressure effects may work on equipment close to the first unit, resulting in the close tank rupture, fire, explosion, that is the secondary accident. Under certain conditions, the secondary accident may lead to higher levels of three or more accident, causing extremely serious consequences of the accident. In simple terms is that two or more times of accidents caused by the initial Tank accident (mainly fire and explosion), and became a serious consequences phenomenon is called Tank domino effect. Figure 1 shows the mechanism of Domino effect in LPG tank area accidents. 

In the questionnaire, the respondents were asked to state, on a scale of 1 (none) to 5 (full) their level of trust in the institutions most usually involved in accident and emergency and crisis management operations. The trust levels in all of the 7 institutions are high, aU of them being above the mean value of the scle fire departments and Portuguese National Medical Emergency Institute (INEM), 4.02 Pohce, 3.44 National Republican Guard, 3.43 municipal civil protection, 3.31 national civil protection 3.38 Red Cross, 3.85. 

In chapter three, the theoretical background to all the potential macro-factors that could contribute to road accidents was presented. The relationship between each factor and the probability that road accidents may occur on the national level was conducted. One special criterion to select suitable indicators was used. This has enabled me to determine the key macro-performance indicators in road safety. It has become clear that the chosen indicators must be easy, available, measurable, and comparable worldwide. Moreover, these indicators must be able to indicate/monitor the country s progress over time in road safety and allow international comparisons. The obtained set of indicators was listed and summarised in Table 3.2. The next step was to understand and explain the main published macroscopic studies and models that are used in describing and comparing the road safety development internationally. I have divided the reviewed models into cross-sectional models (time-independent models) and (time-dependent models). A starting point in this direction was to investigate Smeed s equation, particularly in the relation between motorisation and fatality rates. Several models for... 

---