Level Crossings

Polik W F, Guyer D R and Moore C B 1990 Stark level-crossing spectroscopy of Sq formaldehyde eigenstates at the dissociation threshold J. Chem. Phys. 92 3453-70... 

The present paper is organized as follows In a first step, the derivation of QCMD and related models is reviewed in the framework of the semiclassical approach, 2. This approach, however, does not reveal the close connection between the QCMD and BO models. For establishing this connection, the BO model is shown to be the adiabatic limit of both, QD and QCMD, 3. Since the BO model is well-known to fail at energy level crossings, we have to discuss the influence of such crossings on QCMD-like models, too. This is done by the means of a relatively simple test system for a specific type of such a crossing where non-adiabatic excitations take place, 4. Here, all models so far discussed fail. Finally, we suggest a modification of the QCMD system to overcome this failure. 

We refer to this equation as to the time-dependent Bom-Oppenheimer (BO) model of adiabatic motion. Notice that Assumption (A) does not exclude energy level crossings along the limit solution q o- Using a density matrix formulation of QCMD and the technique of weak convergence one can prove the following theorem about the connection between the QCMD and the BO model ... 

Fig. 2. The BO model is the adiabatic limit of full QD if energy level crossings do not appear. QCMD is connected to QD by the semiclassical approach if no caustics are present. Its adiabatic limit is again the BO solution, this time if the Hamiltonian H is smoothly diagonalizable. Thus, QCMD may be justified indirectly by the adiabatic limit excluding energy level crossings and other discontinuities of the spectral decomposition.

Altogether, the three different models discussed so far are interconnected as sketched in Fig. 2. Now, we can by-pass the problems connected to caustics For e being small enough QCMD is justified as an approximation of QD if we exclude energy level crossings and discontinuities of the spectral decomposition. 

By what we have seen before such a situation can only occur if there is an energy level crossing where Assumption (A) of Thm. 3 is hurt. In the next section, we will present a test example of this situation. 

Energy Level Crossings with Non-Adiabatic Excitations... 

In his book [16], Hagedorn classifies all energy level crossings that can occur generically with an electronic Hamiltonian according to the associated symmetries. Each symmetry yields a finite number of typical, generic energy level... 

Hagedorn, G. A. Electron energy level crossing in the time-dependent Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Theor. Chim. Acta 67 (1990) 163-190... 

Figure 9.41 Potential energy curves for the two lowest electronic states of Nal showing avoided level crossing and the effect of excitation with a femtosecond laser pulse. (Reproduced, with permission, from Rose, T. S., Rosker, M. J. and Zewail, A. H., J. Chem. Phys., 91, 7415, 1989)...

Contaminant concentrations Dispersal of airborne contaminants such as odors, fumes, smoke, VOCs, etc. transported by these airflows and transformed by a variety of processes including chemical and radiochemical transformation, adsorption, desorption to building materials, filtration, and deposition to surfaces evolution of contaminant concentrations in the individual zones air quality checks in terms of CO2 levels cross-contamination evaluation of zones air quality evaluations in relation to perception as well as health. Methods ate also applicable to smoke control design. 

Figure 23. This caricature demonstrates the predicted phenomena of energy level crossing in domains whose energy bias is comparable or larger than the vibronic frequency of the domain wall distortions. The vertical axis is the energy measured from the bottom state the horizontal axis denotes temperature. The diagonal da ed line denotes roughly the thermal energies. A tunneling center that would become thermally active at some temperature Tq will not possess ripplons whose frequency is less than To.

Two microstructured layers of the 2x2 chip were fabricated by photolithography and wet etching in glass (Figure 4.11) [23,24]. These top and bottom layers and a third thinner layer containing holes as conduits were thermally bonded to yield the chip. The way of guiding the micro charmels, as described above, is referred to as two-level crossing. 

Fig. 3. Explanation of the level crossing in Fig. 2 a. a increases from left to right. The A level is stabilized by the decrease in through-space interaction through-bond coupling (hyperconjugation) with the a and a levels of the interposed CH2 destabilizes the S level.

A variation of a, all the other parameters being unchanged, is a pure 1—4 stretch, during which a level crossing similar to that observed in trimethylene is found. Fig. 10 shows the energies of the A and S levels as a function of a, and a through-bond orbital coupling rationale similar to the one for trimethylene. 

Fig. 10. a) Level crossing for increase of a (abscissa, degrees) in tetramethylene. The vertical bar is 1 eV on the energy ordinate scale, b) Level diagram for the same through-bond coupling is shown. 

T stands for trans . The dotted line is the trace of the surface of S and., 4 level crossing. The region between G and T is flat. 

This isomerization is a symmetry-forbidden one, since a level crossing such as the ones found in trimethylene and tetramethylene is found (22) (Fig. 13). It should be noted that, in all these cases, the two-minima structure due to level crossing might, in principle, be swept out by configuration interaction. If the barrier survives, however, the two isomers [4] and [5] can be called bond-stretch isomers. Another example is the isomerization [6] [7] (23). 

Jz = — 6 substrates are brought to resonance at p0H = 0T, thus giving rise to an avoided level crossing which allows QTM to occur (down) [9, 216]. (b) A close view of the hysteresis loop with steps corresponding to the four avoided level crossings [216, 217],... 

Fig. 1. Schematic for /zSR and fiLCR experiments. For pSR the muon spin polarization vector starts off in the x direction (open arrow). It then precesses about an effective field (the vector sum of the external field and the internal hyperfine field), which is normally approximately the z direction. The muons are detected in the M counter, and positrons from muon decay are detected in the L or R counters. For pLCR, the muon spin polarization is initially along the external field or t axis (solid arrow). The positron rates in the F and B counters are measured as a function of external field. A sharp decrease in the asymmetry of the F and B counting rates signifies a level crossing.

---