Level crossing accidents results

Thus, the predictions are 2.6 coUisions per annum, 1.1 derailment per annum, other movement accidents 0.2 per annum (or twice each 10 years), 1600 accidents resulting in commercial risk only each year, 2900 times nothing will happen though the hazard will exist (or in other words the accident will be averted) and 0.00088 level crossing accidents per annum. 

Accidental exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD in a 1949 explosion in a trichlorophenol plant in Nitro, West Virginia, resulted in an outbreak of severe chloracne. Moses et al. (1984) conducted a cross-sectional survey of workers in this plant in 1979. In reviewing the impact of the accident, the authors indicated that 117 workers had severe chloracne as a result of the explosion however, 111 additional workers were found to have had chloracne prior to the explosion. A cross-sectional study of 226 workers in 1979 indicated that 52% had chloracne which persisted for 26 years, and in 29 subjects it was still present after 30 years. Blood levels were not measured, but the air dust in the plant was suspected to have contained 2,4,5-T contaminated with 6 ppm 2,3,7,8-TCDD compared to 0.1 ppm in later years. Similarly, high incidences of chloracne were also found in other facilities (Jirasek et al. 1976 May 1973 Poland et al. 1971 Vos et al. 1978). Appearance of chloracne after accidental occupational exposure may be immediate or delayed since workers may not always be removed from the work environment, the duration of exposure and total exposure is difficult to assess. 

Therefore, there are three main types accidents of tank area can trigger a domino effect fire, explosion, and fire—explosion occurred in both cases simultaneously cross. The first accident has devastating effects of thermal radiation, and other physical effects like overpressure effects may work on equipment close to the first unit, resulting in the close tank rupture, fire, explosion, that is the secondary accident. Under certain conditions, the secondary accident may lead to higher levels of three or more accident, causing extremely serious consequences of the accident. In simple terms is that two or more times of accidents caused by the initial Tank accident (mainly fire and explosion), and became a serious consequences phenomenon is called Tank domino effect. Figure 1 shows the mechanism of Domino effect in LPG tank area accidents. 

Based on the method, we develop a risk model, which differentiates between four types of ship-ship encounters, associating a risk level to each of them. The encounters are of the following types normal encounter, collision avoidance, close-encounter and accident. The obtained results reveal that the areas of the highest risk are related to the waterways crossing between Helsinki and Tallinn, as well as approaches to harbours. The risk model developed here can be used for efficient data screening for encounters of various risk levels as well as for the comparison of traffic situations from various time epochs. 

---