Model human health exposure

Many sophisticated models and correlations have been developed for consequence analysis. Millions of dollars have been spent researching the effects of exposure to toxic materials on the health of animals the effects are extrapolated to predict effects on human health. A considerable empirical database exists on the effects of fires and explosions on structures and equipment. And large, sophisticated experiments are sometimes performed to validate computer algorithms for predicting the atmospheric dispersion of toxic materials. All of these resources can be used to help predict the consequences of accidents. But, you should only perform those consequence analysis steps needed to provide the information required for decision making. 

Fourteen formulations of chemical alternatives were submitted to EPA under confidentiality and they were assessed based on numerous human health and ecotoxicity endpoints in addition to bioaccumulation potential and environmental persistence. They were also screened for potential exposure to workers, users and the aquatic environment. Where data gaps existed, EPA experts used models and chemical analogs to estimate the hazard for a particular endpoint. The literature and test data reviews were published in the final report, Environmentally Preferable Options for Furniture Fire Safety Low Density Furniture Foam . In addition, each hazard endpoint was ranked with a concern level (High, Moderate or Low) based on the criteria used by the EPA s New Chemicals Program to rate the concern level of new chemicals submitted under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). As seen in Figure 8.2, where the hazard endpoint rankings are bold, the value is based on experimental data. Where the hazard endpoints are presented in italic font, the value is estimated based on models or chemical analogs. In this way, detailed hazard information was summarized and presented in a clear and concise format. 

Health Canada Proposal for Priority Setting for Existing Substances on the Domestic Substances List under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Greatest Potential for Human Exposure. This report describes a proposed priority setting process of existing substances in Canada. A stakeholder meeting was convened to discuss the Complex Exposure Model (comET). 

Mewhinney JA, Griffith WC. 1983. A tissue distribution model for assessment of human inhalation exposures to 241Am02. Health Phys 44(Suppl. l) 537-544. 

Collecting and analyzing existing data. Existing data (Table 16.1) are collected and analyzed to develop a conceptual site model that can be used to assess both the nature and the extent of contamination and to identify potential exposure pathways and potential human health or environmental receptors. 

This chapter considers the recently developed tools and the latest versions of the old tools. Some of the tools comprise not only the environmental compartments used on environmental risk assessment but also the human compartment necessary for human health risk assessment. For this reason, when summarizing the models, as described in the second part of this chapter, several characteristics of human compartment are discussed as well. However, a detailed description of human compartment together with a wide range of tools developed for exposure and human risk assessment is presented in the next chapter. 

In this chapter the risk assessment is briefly introduced. Risk assessment is divided into four steps hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. This chapter also highlights five risk and life cycle impact assessment models (EUSES, USEtox, GLOBOX, SADA, and MAFRAM) that allows for assessment of risks to human health and the environment. In addition other 12 models were appointed. Finally, in the last section of this chapter, there is a compilation of useful data sources for risk assessment. The data source selection is essential to obtain high quality data. This source selection is divided into two parts. First, six frequently used databases for physicochemical... 

There are many models for assessing risks to human health and/or the environment. Some of them are multimedia models, which assess the exposure and risks in different environmental matrices, such as soil, air, water, and food chains with different degrees of complexity within each medium. Conversely, others are more specific with regard to a medium or a system (e.g., river or food chain). Other models assess only human health risks or environmental risks, while some assess both risks. Based on the type of scenario that is studied, an appropriate model will be chosen. 

SADA provides a full human health risk assessment module and associated databases. The risk models follow the USEPA s Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) and can be customized to fit site-specific exposure conditions. It calculates risks based on the following exposure pathways ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact, food consumption, and also a combined exposure. 

Analyst to conduct multipathway human health risk assessments and food-web based ecological risk assessment modeling. BREEZE risk analyst combines databases, GIS functionality, fate, transport, and exposure modeling equations into one software application... 

Emissions of DEHP during use of the cushion vinyl floor covering appear to have a negligible contribution in the total weighted score. However, the assessment of the impact of the DEHP emission on human health is based on a characterization model that is developed for outdoor emissions, Usetox. The emission of DEHP during the use phase of the floor covering is indoors and therefore fate and the human exposure... 

Human Health At present, studies on the impact of POPs on human health are very limited in China. Most of the existing literature is focused on dietary studies, as the food chain is considered a major pathway for POPs to effect human health. Information on human health effects such as body burden and metabolism is insufficient and generally extrapolated from modeling data because few doctors have been involved in research on POPs exposures in China. Other exposures through respiration and skin as well as air and soil are seldom studied. 

Haddad S, Tardif GC, Tardif R (2006) Development of physiologically based toxicokinetic models for improving the human indoor exposure assessment to water contaminants trichloroethylene and trihalomethanes. J Toxicol Environ Health A 69(23) 2095-2136... 

The first processes we consider are environmental production and distribution, and the probable modes of human exposure. Then we consider the distribution to tissues even though this area of inquiry, pharmacokinetics, has not yet had a tremendous impact on deciding whether or not a chemical represents a public health hazard, models of physiological distribution are important in understanding toxicology in humans. 

Island would likely become a national wildlife refuge. The cleanup standards, which EPA would establish for each end use scenario, differ in terms of receptors and exposures to inhabitants, which should be defined in an appropriate risk assessment. Receptors are plants, biota, animals, and humans that are exposed to a contaminant of concern. The risk assessment should assess the risks to both human health and ecological receptors, because they may require different end states. PMCD assigned the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM) to prepare the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for JACADS closure and to perform the risk assessment. 

Occupational and toxicological studies have demonstrated adverse health effects from exposure to toxic air contaminants. Data on outdoor levels of toxic air contaminants have not been available for most communities in the United States, making it difficult to assess the potential for adverse human health effects from general population exposures. Models and new experiments provide a great amount of new data (Woodruff et al., 1998). 

In summary, notwithstanding the need to always assess PM modelling uncertainties PM air quality models are widely applied in Europe for various purposes, such as to help decision makers on the development of policies and air quality management systems for protection of ecosystems and human health or for air quality forecast, and consequently human exposure and health effects prevention. 

According to IPCS [18] an exposure model is a conceptual or mathematical representation of the exposure process, designed to reflect real-world human exposure scenarios and processes. There are many different ways to classify exposure models. A consensus appears to be developing around the following classification scheme proposed by the World Health Organization [19], which has been adopted in this chapter (a) mechanistic or empirical and (b) deterministic or stochastic (probabilistic). Table 1 lists these model categories. However, alternative classifications may be considered as well. 

Refinements of the RfC have utilized mechanistic data to modify the interspecies uncertainty factor of 10 (Jarabek, 1995). The reader should appreciate that with the inhalation route of exposure, dosimetric adjustments are necessary and can affect the extrapolations of toxicity data of inhaled agents for human health risk assessment. The EPA has included dosimetry modeling in RfC calculations, and the resulting dosimetric adjustment factor (DAF) used in determining the RfC is dependent on physiochemical properties of the inhaled toxicant as well as type of dosimetry model ranging from rudimentary to optimal model structures. In essence, the use of the DAF can reduce the default uncertainty factor for interspecies extrapolation from 10 to 3.16. 

Droz, P.O., and M.P. Guillemin. 1983. Human styrene exposure. V. Development of a model for biological modeling. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 53(l) 19-36. 

---