Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Highly Protected Risk

The birth of the Highly Protected Risk (HPR) may be a result of the Parmelee head but its foundation is concerned management. Management programs are necessary to support loss prevention technologies and reduce the exposure to loss. The key is the support of these programs do not come without a cost. When money is spent on fire protection equipment, it will not help production to be performed better or faster. It could very well allow them to continue longer. Even the best insurance leaves a company vulnerable to failure after a loss. Companies have failed because of loss of face in the cormnunity or loss of customers. Neither is insurable. [Pg.379]

Their drawback was that it contributed fuel to a fire. This type building is no longer being built, but its substantial construction has allowed many to remain usable. [Pg.380]

The theory of a highly protected risk led to the idea of codes to regulate protection. These set minimum criteria of protection for the good of mankind. The two most prevalent codes are concensus codes and model building codes. [Pg.380]

While modem semiconductor facilities are clean and innocent to the eye, they use hazardous chemicals in substantial quantities. These facilities found themselves being regulated as hazardous or H occupancies. This led to some very difficult interpretations and enforcement. The very special needs of the semiconductor industry and its desire to police itself resulted in modifications to the code. This modification was the H-6 Occupancy developed for the Uniform Building Code. In 1990, the National Building Code and the Standard Building Code were amended to include this specific occupancy. [Pg.381]

Conclusion. The concensus code and the model building code are minimum standards. They are written so they can be readily enforced for the smallest of installations. As the NFPA made the local sprinkler codes of 1896 uniform, it is hoped the creation of NFPA 318 Standard for the Protection of Clean Rooms will make the model building codes more uniform. Since the model building codes already reference many of the NFPA Codes and the NFPA Code is the most widely known and accepted throughout the United States, progress is imminent. [Pg.381]


These are heat- and flameproof cables suitable for high fire risk zones. In severe fire conditions, when the outer protection and insulation have been destroyed, these cables would still maintain continuity of essential services. [Pg.533]

An exposure scenario can be as wide or specific as a company carrying out a risk assessment deems necessary. The advantage of a generic exposure scenario is that it covers a range of uses, but this may result in some over-protective risk-reduction measures being implemented. In comparison, a specific exposure scenario can clearly delineate how to control exposures from distinct uses or target potential high-exposure uses that require particular safety measures. A specific exposure scenario may therefore require a more in-depth safety assessment. [Pg.69]

Type IV Risk characterisation - Lack of data exists on the level of compliance, compliance monitoring and enforcement for a high level risk that requires specific safety measures to ensure adequate protection. - Insufficient monitoring or modelling data exists to determine the extent of trans-boundary pollution caused by emissions to environment. - Exposure data of ecosystems and humans via the environment primarily depend on emissions from incorrectly disposed products. [Pg.201]

We know much less about the health risks from indoor air pollution than we do about those attributable to the contamination of outdoor air [4]. Several studies have shown that for inhabitants, especially children and other vulnerable subgroups, the home environment may be a dominant source of exposure to toxicants, including pesticides [5]. Indoor pollution has been ranked by the United States Environmental Protection Agency Advisory Board (US-EPA) and the Centers for Disease Control as a high environmental risk [6]. [Pg.90]

Since the publication of these two early studies, a number of studies have adopted a more prospective cohort approach to the examination of statin use in patients who develop dementia and AD over the course of a set period (usually between 5-10yrs). While many of the subsequent studies described seemingly protective effects in cross-sectional case-control analysis [36,45-51], the majority of prospective cohort analysis failed to identify a reduced risk of dementia in incident cases of dementia or AD [36, 46,47,51[. One notable exception comes from a study that examined a population identified by common AD risk facfors and co-morbidities (e.g., first degree relatives) [52]. In a high AD risk population, statin use was associated with a lowered risk of AD [52]. A summary of the epidemiological findings for stafin use in AD are shown in Table 1. [Pg.57]

Table III describes the risk of failure by vaccine formulation and OSM IgG antibody levels and OVACAR killing immune response, separately for each relapse risk categoiy. The combinations shown are those that resulted in interaction terms with p<0.15. In most cases, the sample sizes are too small to produce significant subgroup results, but all comparisons suggest differential effects of factors across relapse risk levels. For example, the protective effect of OSM IgG antibody titer level on the risk of failure is found only in those patients with intermediate or high relapse risk. In low risk patients, OSM IgG antibody titer level is not associated with EFS. Table III describes the risk of failure by vaccine formulation and OSM IgG antibody levels and OVACAR killing immune response, separately for each relapse risk categoiy. The combinations shown are those that resulted in interaction terms with p<0.15. In most cases, the sample sizes are too small to produce significant subgroup results, but all comparisons suggest differential effects of factors across relapse risk levels. For example, the protective effect of OSM IgG antibody titer level on the risk of failure is found only in those patients with intermediate or high relapse risk. In low risk patients, OSM IgG antibody titer level is not associated with EFS.
Gray WA, Hopkins NL, Yadav S, et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients The ARCHeR results. J Vase Surg 2006 44 258-69. [Pg.177]

Inhaled zanamivir is effective for the prevention and treatment of influenza A and B virus infections. Early zanamivir treatment (10 mg twice daily for 5 days) of febrile influenza in ambulatory adults and children >5 years old shortens the duration of illness by 1—3 days and in adults reduces by 40% the risk of lower respiratory tract complications requiring antibiotic use. Once-daily zanamivir is highly protective against community-acquired influenza illness, and when given for 10 days, protects against household transmission. [Pg.829]

Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria expose an important risk to human health around the world. These bacteria are very resistant to traditional antibiotics owing to acquired resistance, inadequate diffusion and intracellular inactivation. Therefore, the development of novel antimicrobial materials with high protection and antibacterial activity, which lack bacterial resistance, is critical. [Pg.88]

Needless to say, we do not live in a two-asset world, and this complicates matters further. An investor might place a high inflation risk premium on an index-linked bond when only nominal alternatives are available, but the value attributed to the risk premium will also be influenced at least a little by the availability of competing assets offering some degree of inflation protection—the more classic inflation hedges such as real estate and land. [Pg.263]

For those scenarios that involve medium to high risk to employees, the environment, or to the community, an assessment of the protection layers is conducted to determine whether the required functionality and integrity are provided by the existing design. This assessment is sometimes performed as part of the PHA or in a more focused study that addresses only those scenarios of medium to high process risk. [Pg.30]


See other pages where Highly Protected Risk is mentioned: [Pg.279]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.2969]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.1503]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.840]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.180]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.379 ]




SEARCH



High-risk

© 2024 chempedia.info