Heavy element analysis

The rare isotopes 14C, 10Be, 26Al, 36C1, 41 Ca and 129I provide the bulk of the work performed by AMS laboratories. Recently, AMS has been applied to heavy element analysis, especially for U and Pu. Other isotopes analyzed by AMS include... 

X-ray fluorescence A method of analysis used to identify and measure heavy elements in the presence of each other in any matrix. The sample is irradiated with a beam of primary X-rays of greater energy than the characteristic X-radiation of the elements in the sample. This results in the excitation of the heavy elements present and the emission of characteristic X-ray energies, which can be separated into individual wavelengths and measured. The technique is not suitable for use with elements of lower atomic number than calcium. 

Chemical Properties. Elemental analysis, impurity content, and stoichiometry are determined by chemical or iastmmental analysis. The use of iastmmental analytical methods (qv) is increasing because these ate usually faster, can be automated, and can be used to determine very small concentrations of elements (see Trace AND RESIDUE ANALYSIS). Atomic absorption spectroscopy and x-ray fluorescence methods are the most useful iastmmental techniques ia determining chemical compositions of inorganic pigments. Chemical analysis of principal components is carried out to determine pigment stoichiometry. Analysis of trace elements is important. The presence of undesirable elements, such as heavy metals, even in small amounts, can make the pigment unusable for environmental reasons. 

Considering that heavy elements have more levels than just K and L, Eq. (2.2) also indicates that the heavier the element, the more numerous are the possible Auger transitions. Fortunately, there are large differences between the probabilities of different Auger transitions, so that even for the heaviest elements, only a few intense transitions occur, and analysis is still possible. 

The material balance is consistent with the results obtained by OSA (S2+S4 in g/100 g). For oil A, the coke zone is very narrow and the coke content is very low (Table III). On the contrary, for all the other oils, the coke content reaches higher values such as 4.3 g/ 100 g (oil B), 2.3 g/ioo g (oil C), 2.5 g/ioo g (oil D), 2.4/100 g (oil E). These organic residues have been studied by infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis to compare their compositions. The areas of the bands characteristic of C-H bands (3000-2720 cm-1), C=C bands (1820-1500 cm j have been measured. Examples of results are given in Fig. 4 and 5 for oils A and B. An increase of the temperature in the porous medium induces a decrease in the atomic H/C ratio, which is always lower than 1.1, whatever the oil (Table III). Similar values have been obtained in pyrolysis studies (4) Simultaneously to the H/C ratio decrease, the bands characteristics of CH and CH- groups progressively disappear. The absorbance of the aromatic C-n bands also decreases. This reflects the transformation by pyrolysis of the heavy residue into an aromatic product which becomes more and more condensed. Depending on the oxygen consumption at the combustion front, the atomic 0/C ratio may be comprised between 0.1 and 0.3 ... 

Various reference materials have been described, to help improving the reliability of trace elemental analysis of lead and other heavy elements, for clinical and environmental applications. Such materials include blood10,11, diets, feces, air filters, dust11, foodstuffs12 and biological tissues13. 

Non-destructive elemental analysis of solid or liquid samples for major and minor constituents. Used in routine analysis of metallurgical and mineral samples. Most suited to the determination of heavy elements in light matrices (e.g. Br or Pb in petroleum). Well suited for on-stream, routine analysis. Electron beam excitation methods valuable in surface studies in combination with electron microscopy. Detection limits generally in the range 10-100 ppm. Relative precision, 5-10%. 

In addition to absorption problems, measurements will be affected by secondary fluorescence and scattered radiations which will enter the detector and increase the general background. Detection limits under optimum conditions (a heavy element in a light matrix) may be as low as 10 ppm. Quantitative analysis is however difficult below the 20-100 ppm region if a reasonable precision (5% or better) is to be obtained. 

Owing to their superior fluorescent yield, heavy elements ordinarily yield considerably more intense XRF bands than the light elements. This feature can be exploited to determine the concentration of inorganic species in a sample, or the concentration of a compound that contains a heavy element in some matrix. Many potential XRF applications have never been developed owing to the rise of atomic spectroscopic methods, particularly inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry [74]. Nevertheless, under the right set of circumstances, XRF analysis can be profitably employed. 

The introduction of EU directives on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Reduction of Hazardous Substances has highlighted the need for precise and repeatable elemental analysis of heavy metals in the plastics production process. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy has emerged as the most economical and effective analytical tool for achieving this. A set of certified standards, known as TOXEL, is now available to facilitate XRF analyses in PE. Calibration with TOXEL standards is simplified by the fact that XRF is a multi-element technique. Therefore a single set of the new standards can be used to calibrate several heavy elements, covering concentrations from trace level to several hundred ppm. This case study is the analysis of heavy metals in PE using an Epsilon 5 XRF spectrometer. 

The situation with respect to establishing a reliable absolute shielding scale for heavy elements remains somewhat unclear. Two methods that are both in principle exact give significantly different results, whereas more approximate methods give yet another result. As the quantity of interest is difficult to measure experimentally, it wdl be necessary to analyze the causes for the discrepancy in more detail, both theoretically and numerically. Another interesting study could be the analysis of the effects that the differences between the Kutzelnigg and unmodified Dirac response formalisms will have on chemical shifts. In that case, one could use experimental data to decide upon a preferred formahsm. 

In two cases submitters have observed that the residue separated into two layers. The upper layer consists of a heavy oil apparently because of incomplete washing of the lithium suspension used in manufacturing methyl 1 ithium. When this happens it is necessary to remove the oil with a pipette prior to distillation. Failure to do so gives a product which appears pure by TLC, but which is substantially impure according to elemental analysis (IX high in carbon). ... 

---