Flow chart laboratory

Fig. 14-9. Wet/dry precipitation collector and flow chart for analysis of samples. (DI HjO distilled water). Source "NADP Quality Assurance Report," Central Analytical Laboratory, Illinois Institute of Nafural Resources, Champaign, 111., March 1980.

The reaction flow-charts of Part Two, and indeed all chemical formulae which appear in this book, were generated by computer. The program used for these drawings was ChemDraw adapted for the Macintosh personal computer by Mr. Stewart Rubenstein of these Laboratories from the molecular graphics computer program developed by our group at Harvard in the 1960 s (E. J. Corey and W. T. Wipke, Science, 1969,166, 178-192) and subsequently refined. 

Laboratory applications of the computer, as evidenced by this symposium, are concentrating more on the result, and less on the hardware required to accomplish that result. A few years ago, a symposium of this type would have concentrated on the automated collection and analysis of data from laboratory instrumentation. Each paper would read like a chapter from "Tom Swift and His Electric Lab Whiz" and would dwell on the details of circuit diagrams and program flow charts. These papers were presented by... 

Read the entire laboratory activity. Make a flow chart of the procedure you will follow. 

Figure 4.4. Flow chart of analytical operations in Dodgy Laboratories Inc.

The kinds of analyses encountered in the laboratory are selected according to the nature of the sample and the purpose of the analysis. The following flow chart illustrates common areas that require analytical data ... 

In the DDT exanple mentioned above, calculating the parameters associated with the 30% concentration in xylene and analyzing the effectiveness of octyl phenol adducts versus nonyl phenol adducts, we see the correlation between the predicted performance and the laboratory evaluations. Thus, a flow chart of events for the calculation, using a con juter program, would be as follows ... 

At about the same time, the Charleston Laboratory of the U.S. National Marine Eisheries Service prepared menhaden oil omega-3 fatty acid ethyl ester concentrates on a large scale for participants in projects funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Their flow chart. Eigure 13, combined development work also carried out at the Seattle and Gloucester Laboratories, much of it recorded in the book by M.E. Stansby (26). The final process adopted includes urea complexing of ethyl esters in a total of seven stages, viz ... 

Figure 6. Schematic flow charts of filter preparation (left), shipboard handling (middle), and laboratory analysis schemes (right).

The laboratory procedures associated with identification comprise a process known as qualitative analysis. In Part A of this experiment, you will examine 11 household products to determine some specific physical and chemical properties and to establish a qualitative analysis scheme for their identification. The physical properties include characteristics associated with their physical appearance, including color, particle size, and texture, as well as their solubility in water, rubbing alcohol, and hot water. The chemical properties include the manner in which the white solids react chemically with various other chemicals. In Part B, you will have three to five unknown household products (taken from those tested in Part A) and your work will involve using your qualitative analysis scheme to identify them. The flow chart that follows the procedure (Figure 3.6) should be filled out while performing Part A and should help when you perform Part B. 

The figure shown on the patent face page is a flow chart of the laboratory apparatus which was used to carry out the test. A sample of 15 g tall oil soap was charged to the extractor 22 the charge contained 4.9% neutral oil. The sample was exuacted with ethylene at 4000 psi, 70 °C. An extract sample weighing 0.54 g was analyzed and was found to contain 64% neutrals which represented almost one-half the neutrals present in the charge. The identity of the other 36% fraction of the extract was not reported but probably consisted of free resin and fatty acids. 

The DWQI diagnosis takes the form of a decision tree. The diagnostic framework consists of a combination of decisions that follow from the flow chart or identification key, and of concrete tools. These tools vary from laboratory or field experiments to literature reviews and a theoretical or model approach to the system. 

A plan for reaction to special causes on the chart should be established. Often a checklist of items to evaluate or a flow chart of the steps to follow is useful. The reaction plan should state the transfer of responsibility for identification of the special cause if it cannot be done at the local level. A plan for reaction to special causes on the chart should be established. Often a checklist of items to evaluate or a flow chart of the steps to follow is useful. The reaction plan should state the transfer of responsibility for identification of the special cause if it cannot be done at the local level. As an example, a reaction plan for a control chart in a laboratory to monitor a measurement system might have the following reaction plan ... 

Fig. A.8 - Flow chart for the simulation of laboratory electrochemical exoeriments.

Chapter 3 describes which data are required for assessing a borrow area and designing a reclamation area. A brief description of the most common methods of data collection can be found in Appendix B, Field and laboratory tests . Some of these data collection methods will also be discussed in other chapters of this manual, where appropriate. The flow chart shows the structure of this chapter and where to find information corresponding to various items. 

If polymers are examined spectroscopically without removing additives such as fillers, plasticisers, stabilisers, lubricants, etc. then their infrared spectra may be affected drastically by the presence of these substances. Also, if care has not been taken during the preparation of a sample, bands due to contaminants such as water, silicate, phthalates, polypropylene (from laboratory ware), etc, may appear in the spectra and so result in some confusion. Hence, the flowcharts given below should be used with some degree of caution. In order to confirm an assignment made by use of the flow chart, it is important finally to make use of known infrared reference spectra. However, it should be borne in mind that stereoregular polymers may have spectra which differ from their atactic form and that sample preparative techniques may also affect the spectrum obtained for a particular polymeric sample. 

Many comprehensive schemes for separation of commercial products have been published. These attempt the systematic identification of every ingredient in a formulation by a single general approach and are represented by flow charts of as many as a dozen steps. These methods are very valuable in the laboratory of the originator, but are not easily translated to other locations where the nature of the samples and the equipment available to the analyst differ. These general schemes are not covered here. We limit our discussion to separation of only a few components at once, allowing the reader to tailor an approach to the problem at hand. 

Repeat chromatograms in GPC should agree within 2%. However, the chromatogram is sensitive to such experimental conditions as (a) resolution of the columns, (b) range of porosities of the column packings, (c) flow rate of solvent, and (d) age of detectors. It is recommended that the laboratory use control charts to determine the optimal conditions of the instrument. 

---