Federal Aviation Administration, system safety

Federal Aviation Administration, System safety handbook, chapter 3. Washington D.C. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. 

The Federal Aviation Administration s System Safety Handbook is also on the Internet as a free download. This is really a training manual. There are 17 chapters and 10 appendices—all individually downloadable as a separate pdf file. Enter Federal Aviation Administration System Safety Handbook into a search engine or go to http //www. faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/risk management/ss handbook/. 

Federal Aviation Administration System Safety Handbook. Enter title into a search engine, or at http //www.faa.gov/library/manuals/aviation/risk management/ss handbook/. 

McIntyre, G. R. (2002). The application of system safety engineering and management techniques at the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Safety Science, 40, 325-335. 

Figure 8.2 Overview of an Eight Step Risk Assessment Model. Based on and adapted from System Safety Process Steps. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Safety Risk Management Order, 8040.4.

System Safety Handbook. Federal Aviation Administration, 30 December 2000. 

System Safety Handbook. 30 December 2000. Federal Aviation Administration, http //www.faa. gov/regulations policies/handbooks manuals/aviation/iisk management/ss handbook/. 

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has studied the fire behaviour of the engineering plastics that are now used as cabin materials. These would have a significant effect on postcrash fires that can pose the most serious threat to passenger safety. The results form part of a flammability and smoke properties database and create a benchmark for new fire safety systems. 

Today, the system safety process is still used extensively by the various military organizations within the Department of Defense, as well as by many other federal agencies such as NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Department of Energy. In most cases, it is a required element of primary concern in the federal agency contract acquisition process. 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) As part of its functions, FAA fosters aviation safety through several activities. It issues and enforces regulations and standards for the manufacture, use, and maintenance of aircraft. It certifies pilots, other flight personnel and airports, operates and maintains air navigation systems, manages air traffic, and conducts research in systems, procedures, facilities, and devices to ensure aviation safety. 

Some government organizations require or apply system safety methods for construction projects. A project may require selective use of methods. Organizations apply system safety in some construction projects. Included are the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Defense and its service agencies, the Federal Aviation Administration and others. Some projects may simply require use of preliminary hazard analysis that leads to a site safety plan for a project. Complex facilities that integrate specialized equipment into the project may require failure mode and effects analysis or even fault tree analysis. 

Safety standards acknowledge the economic need to employ previously developed systems, functions and components [12] [13] [14] [15]. In civil aerospace for example, systems may be reused across different aircraft types, without the need for additional assessment, provided that evidence of similar design, installation, application and operation can be produced [15]. Otherwise, the safety assessment process should be performed to examine the impact of the reusable systems on the aircraft functions. Also in civil aerospace, particularly for airborne software, the American Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) created an Advisory Circular (AC), offering means to satisfy the requirements of the aerospace software guidance DO-178B regarding the use of reusable software components [16]. 

CASE STUDY US FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, IMPROVING OVERSIGHT THROUGH SYSTEM SAFETY... 

Federal Aviation Administration. 2013. System Approach for Safety Oversight Program (SASO), http //www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/saso/, downloaded May 20, 2014. 

Adapted from Federal Aviation Administration, Chapters—Principles of System Safety , 2000, and Chapter 4—Safety Assessments Before Investment Decision , 2000 (Principles of System Safety, 2000, chap. 3, Safety assessments before Investment decision, 2000, chap. 6). Adapted from Roughton and Crutchfield, 2008 (Roughton Crutchfield, 2008) Acquisition Risk Management Probability Definitions, n.d. 

Principles of system safety. (2000). Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Public Domain. Retrieved from http //1. usa.gov/YiEZvJ. 

Safety standards set requirements to achieve the functional safety, while leaving the space for the developers on details on how they should implement those requirements. The same holds for the change management, i.e., the lEC 61508 does not specify which system attributes have to be considered when analysing the impact of changes. More concrete guidelines about this can be found in the avionics domain, concretely in the concept Reusable Software Component (RSC) from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that was developed for the standard... 

FAA Federal Aviation Administration, 2010, DOT/ FAA/AM-10/13.2013. Office of Aerospace Medicine, Causes of General Aviation Accidents and Incidents Analysis Using NASA Aviation, Safety Reporting System Data, Washington DC, U.S. Department of Transportation press. 

Many dictionaries define accident as an event occurring by chance or unintentionally. An accident is also defined as an unplanned event that results in a harmful outcome for example, death, injury, occupational illness, or major damage to or loss of property (System Safety Handbook Practices and Guidelines for Conducting System Safety Engineering and Management, Federal Aviation Administration [FAA], December 2000). An accident event is undesired, unintentional, and results in negative consequences. 

There are various types of aviation recording and reporting systems used throughout the world. In the United States, there are four major organizations that collect and analyze aviation safety-related data. These organizations are the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) [6]. Nonetheless, some of the data systems that can be useful in obtaining aviation safety-related information are as follows [6]. 

Past experience indicates that the commimication between air traffic controllers and pilots is subject to various types of errors. In fact, as per a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) study of 386 reports submitted to the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) during the period from July 1991 to May 1996, the pilot-controller communication errors can be grouped into four types [18] ... 

Cardosi, K., P. Falzarano, and S. Han. 1998. Pilot-controller communication errors An analysis of Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRA) Reports. Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-98/17. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Washington, D.C. 

Heinemann (Ed.). Butterworth Heinemann. Retrieved from http //amzn.to/lqoD4oN Safety Management System. (2008). Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Manual — Version 2.1, Public Domain. Retrieved from http //l.usa.gov/WSds8S System Safety Management Guide. (2013, August). Department of the Army, Pamphlet 385-16, Public Domain. Retrieved from http //bit.ly/llfOgib... 

The aviation industries call most the aerospace-grade non-OEM parts Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) parts. PMA is a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design-and-production approval. It is a governmental certification system that marks a part that meets FAA regulatory performance requirements. A PMA part is an FAA-certificated part that satisfies FAA safety regulations and the fabrication inspection system. Many PMA parts are reinvented using reverse engineering. 

---