Environmental quality level

Plant Strategies At the plant level, a number of things can be done to minimize the impact of environmental quality requirements. These include ... 

The combination of lower thermostat settings, reduced ventilation, and lower lighting levels created environmental quality problems in many buildings. Even today, some building owners associate energy consei-vation with poor indoor environmental conditions. 

At the plant level, in-plant monitoring of unique compounds and the modeling of plant conditions to develop appropriate working practices and internal environmental quality standards may be needed. 

AAC = acceptable ambient concentration ACGIH = American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists ADEQ = Arizona Department of Environmental Quality SNA = Bureau of National Affairs CDC = Center for Disease Control CERCLA = Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR = Code of Federal Regulations DNR = Department of Natural Resources DWEL = drinking water equivalent level ... 

Areas for the manufacture of sterile products are classified according to the required characteristics of the environment. Each manufacturing operation requires an appropriate level of microbial and particulate cleanliness four grades (Table 22.1) are specified in the Rules and Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Distributors (1997), defined by measures of airborne contamination (Table 22.2). Environmental quality is substantially influenced by the air supplied to the manufacturing environment. 

The BASIC toxicity database contains information on the aquatic toxicity of a number of hazardous substances. In many cases, the information is given as some sort of safe level such as UK Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) or the national/international equivalent. For substances for which no such levels have been set, a brief literature review was performed in order to produce an environmental hazard/risk assessment. 

The stated preference method is a direct approach and is used in order to value both use values and non-use values by using a hypothetical market. The choice experiment (CE) and the contingent valuation (CV) methods are the two most common examples of stated preference methods. In the CE method the respondents are asked to choose a level of environmental quality from a set of varying environmental qualities, called choice set. In the CV method the respondent is asked to imagine an environmental market situation and is then asked how she would act in that given situation. CE and CV attempts to find the WTP for a good or service by asking individuals direct questions about their preferences. Alternatively, researchers can ask the respondents for their WTA. 

Causape J, Quilez D, Aragues R (2004) Assessment of irrigation and environmental quality at the hydrological basin level - II. Salt and nitrate loads in irrigation return flows. Agric Water Manage 70 211-228... 

Regarding the specific issue of NP and NPEOs there is still some disparity between the USA and Europe. In Europe, voluntary bans in the industrial sector are in place and in household applications they are already forbidden, with environmental quality standards set at 1 pgL-1 levels. However, in the USA the situation is quite different with much milder measures being taken such as pollution prevention or source reduction efforts, as opposed to the outright APEO ban in Europe. 

Impacts on human health and environmental quality Participants pointed out that although many studies are being undertaken, there is still little comprehensive understanding of levels of exposures and the impact of such exposures on human health or the specific effects of POPs on ecosystems in China. 

The results of the study were not encouraging. While there was some level of progress in some areas in all nations, the overall trend in environmental quality from 1970 to 1995 was in a negative direction. Denmark and the Netherlands earned the best scores, showing declines in environmental quality of 10.6 percent and 11.4 percent, respectively. The two nations with the most disappointing results were Canada and France, with a decrease in environmental quality of 38.1 percent and 41.2 percent, respectively. The United States occupied a middle point in the range, with a decrease in environmental quality of 22.1 percent. 

Although ASTM specifies certain quality levels, there are a number of factors that contribute to other quality levels in the marketplace. At times, government regulations are more restrictive than ASTM specifications, especially with respect to environmental issues. Secondly, competitive forces may encourage companies to provide fuel quality that is better than that defined by ASTM. Thirdly, ASTM specifications do not have the force of law, and certain companies may decide to exceed or not meet their recommended values. In response to this last factor, some states have adopted ASTM fuel quality specifications as state regulations, thus forcing a minimum quality level in the field. 

Fig. 2.11. Comparison of PCDDs/DFs levels in Korean environments with environmental quality criteria proposed worldwide. Range indicates minimum (min), maximum (max), median (med), and arithmetic mean (avg). Dotted lines indicate environmental quality criteria 0.6pg TEQ m i for ambient air (EQC-a), 1 pg TEQ L-1 for ambient water (EQC-wl) and lOpg TEQ I. (EQC-w2) for wastewater, 5 (EQC-sl) and 40 (EQC-s2) pg TEQ g-1 dw for soil, and 0.85 (EQC-fs) and 21.5 (EQC-ss) pg TEQ g-1 dw for sediment. Japanese data is based on WHO-TEQs including PCDDs/DFs and coPCBs (JMOE, 2002).

Fig. 2.22. Comparison of measured levels and environmental quality criteria (EQCs) for nonylphenol (NP) in water, soil and sediments from the various sites, in South Korea (a) water (n = 172), (b) soil (n = 105), (c) freshwater sediment (n = 131), (d) brakish sediment (n = 47), (e) marine sediment (n = 93). Range indicates minimum (min), maximum (max), and arithmetic mean (avg.). Dotted lines represent Canadian EQCs proposed for marine water (WQC-m) and freshwater (WQC-f), and marine sediment (SQG-m) and freshwater sediment (SQG-f) (see the text).

Consequently, they are able to integrate pollutant levels over a broad area by bioaccumulation (Furness, 1993). A bird egg, unlike a mammalian fetus, is an isolated and independent metabolic system. In addition, persistent, bioaccumulative and lipophilic pollutants (e.g. PCBs, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans) are known to biomagnify in the egg yolk and result in concentrations of orders of magnitude higher than the ambient concentrations in the diet of the female bird (Kleinow et al., 1999). The contaminant levels in waterbird eggs, therefore, provide important and useful information for monitoring changes in environmental quality. 

Almost all the PTS chemicals being lipophilic, non-degradable and not easily excreted from animal bodies were not found in considerable concentrations in the animal excreta like feces and urine. The only study by Singh et al. (2004) on impact assessment of sewage treatment plants on the environmental quality of the waste disposal area in Varanasi and Kanpur, two big cities in India showed that the mean values of HCHs and DDTs in the urine samples of the people in the exposed area were higher than those living in unexposed areas, the levels being lower than those in blood of the same subjects. Other than these, we could not find any other data available in the published literature on the levels of PTS in Indian human urine or feces. 

Other related regulations on the management of pesticides are the Environmental Quality Act 1974, the Food Act 1983 and the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Sufian Yek, 2005). The primary objective of the Environmental Quality Act 1974 is to control the discharge of chemical and industrial wastes including pesticides into the environment, so that there will be no adverse effects on human health and the environment. The disposal of pesticides has not been a significant problem in Malaysia as it is an offence to discharge any toxic waste into the environment. There is a chemical waste treatment facility, which is able to handle all the chemical wastes produced in the country. The Food Act 1983 (under Schedule 16 of its Food Regulation 1985) prescribes the maximum residue levels of certain pesticides in food. The Occupational... 

US Environmental Protection Agency, Method 1669 Sampling Ambient Water for Trace Metals at EPA Water Quality Levels (Sampling Guidance), EPA-821-R-96-001, [US Environmental Protection Agency, 1996c],... 

---