Environment impacts surfactants

There are still some specifications to be taken into account in making the final selections. The S4 specification requires a high stability at rest, and an efficient repulsion by the interfacially adsorbed surfactant. Anionic surfactants could do flie job, but it must be remembered that sodium ions are prohibited (S8). Since divalentcations are likely to precipitate most anionic surfactants, organic ammonium derivativecations may be the answer. Cationic surfactants are likely to be ruled out for several reasons, among them their environment impact and hydrophobation properties. Nonionic surfactants may provide stabilization, mainly through steric repulsion. 

Because of increasing concern for the effect of industrialization on human life and the environment, every chemical material or process is scrutinized for safety and compatibility to minimize impact. Surfactants are functional chemicals in principle, so many synthetic surfactants are developed to improve their cost effectiveness. 

Linear alkylbenzenesulfonic acid is the largest intermediate used for surfactant production in the world. In the United States it has been determined that 2.6 g/d of material is used per inhabitant (46). Owing to the large volumes of production and consumption of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, much attention has been paid to its biodegradation and a series of evaluations have been performed to thoroughly study its behavior in the environment (47—56). Much less attention has been paid to the environmental impact of other sulfonic acid-based materials. 

Some of the reports are as follows. Mizukoshi et al. [31] reported ultrasound assisted reduction processes of Pt(IV) ions in the presence of anionic, cationic and non-ionic surfactant. They found that radicals formed from the reaction of the surfactants with primary radicals sonolysis of water and direct thermal decomposition of surfactants during collapsing of cavities contribute to reduction of metal ions. Fujimoto et al. [32] reported metal and alloy nanoparticles of Au, Pd and ft, and Mn02 prepared by reduction method in presence of surfactant and sonication environment. They found that surfactant shows stabilization of metal particles and has impact on narrow particle size distribution during sonication process. Abbas et al. [33] carried out the effects of different operational parameters in sodium chloride sonocrystallisation, namely temperature, ultrasonic power and concentration sodium. They found that the sonocrystallization is effective method for preparation of small NaCl crystals for pharmaceutical aerosol preparation. The crystal growth then occurs in supersaturated solution. Mersmann et al. (2001) [21] and Guo et al. [34] reported that the relative supersaturation in reactive crystallization is decisive for the crystal size and depends on the following factors. 

As mentioned before, the presence of surfactants in anaerobic compartments cannot be separated from their physico-chemical characteristics and in fact surfactants which degrade extensively in the laboratory under anaerobic conditions, e.g. soap, are also found in considerable concentrations in anaerobic compartments. Due to their hydrophobic character surfactants are strongly sorbed to sludges and therefore a large amount of the load of these compounds into a sewage treatment plant (reportedly 20-50%) is associated with suspended solids [43,44]. The relevance of the presence of surfactants in the environment should be assessed, therefore, on the basis of their potential impact on the structure and function of the various compartments. In most cases, ionic surfactants are present as insoluble salts and therefore their potential impact is negligible as reflected in the lack of known negative impacts. 

This chapter presents a summary of the available information regarding the toxicity of surfactants in the aquatic environment and also the new data with special emphasis on the marine environment, the use of microalgae and early life-stages of fish in toxicity assays. In the last few years, one aspect related to the impact of biodegradation products of surfactants in the environment has acquired a significant relevance—the estrogenic effect—and this subject is treated in depth in Chapter 7.3 of this book. 

Cho HH, Choi J, Goltz MN, Park JW (2002) Combined effect of natural oiganic matter and surfactants on the apparent solubihty of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Environ Qual 31 275-280 Coulibaly KM, Borden RC (2004) Impact of edible oil injection on the permeabihty of aquifer sands. J Contam Hydrol 71 219-237... 

Cserhati T., E. Forgacs, and G. Oros (2002). Biological activity and environmental impact of anionic surfactants. Environment International 28 337-348. 

One last consideration during the selection process of a suitable surfactant or other facilitating agent must be an examination of toxicity and biodegradability issues so that no adverse impact on the environment or on human health occurs. For example, upon completion of SEAR, any residual HOCs or surfactants remaining in the aquifer should be easily biodegradable or, at minimum, have a relatively low toxicity. Because NOMs and cyclodextrins are naturally-occurring materials, they may have less of an environmental impact than conventional chemical surfactants and may be... 

In terrestrial systems, numerous factors have been recognized as essential in determining a herbivore s gut environment, and, hence, its response to tannins. In marine systems, many of these same factors may impact the activity of phlorotannins in the herbivore gut. These include gut morphology 44 pH,25 redox potential,58 124 166 enzyme composition and activity,33 57 surfactant type and concentration,70 160 167 cation type and concentration,70 124168 proteins or amino acids,169-175 gut microbial activity,49 50 67 and nutritional status.33... 

Fatty alcohols, by which the author means those in the range C and above, are split into two classes, petrochemical and oleochemical, or, as they are more usually referred to, synthetic and natural. The discussion of the relative merits of synthetic vs natural products has been at the forefront of surfactant technology for many years and has produced a wealth of literature. It is beyond the scope of this work to discuss whether oleochemicals have an inherent environmental benefit over petrochemicals. A good deal of scientific study on life cycle analysis and macro environmental impact is available but social and ethical arguments, as well as the perceptions of the end consumer, also play a part. On a strictly scientific basis, the author sees no inherent advantage in either source. The performance of a surfactant based on synthetic materials may differ from a naturally derived one but neither is intrinsically better than the other. In terms of impact on humans and the environment, there is also no clear evidence to suggest a difference between the two sources of hydrophobe. 

In addition, because they are generally based on aminoacid structures, they are among the most biodegradable surfactants available to the formulator. Products based on amphoteric surfactants are usually readily biodegradable, thus having a minimal impact on the environment. 

The basis and likely impact of this Directive have been described. Apart from some very brief comments, there has been no specific reference to surfactants. This is because the Directive covers any chemical that falls within the scope as described and whilst this will include many surfactants, it also includes many other types. Having said this, there is no reason to suppose that surfactants will fare better than any other class of chemicals. Also, as indicated at the beginning, this chapter describes the situation in autumn 2004 when much of the impact due to the transitional measures is still to be realised. This Directive is considered by many to be over the top control for this group of products. However, this is an inevitable consequence of biocidal products also being known as pesticides. Only time will tell whether this Directive will actually improve or increase the levels of risk to humans, animals or the environment. 

For these reasons surfactants such as DHTDMAC have been safely used worldwide for decades. For instance, despite an annual DHTDMAC consumption of 27,000 tons in 1980 in Germany, there has been no clear evidence of any negative impact on the environment [10],... 

Surfactants are performance chemicals that is, they are used to perform a particular function in some process or product, in contrast to other organic chemicals that may be used to produce another chemical or product. Since they are used in products or processes that impact on the environment, there are concerns regarding their effect, particularly their biodegradability in the environment and their toxicity to marine organisms. 

The impact of different surfactants (SDS, DOSS, CTAB and hexadimethrine bromide, bile salts °), nonionic and mixed micelles, and additives (neutral and anionic CDs," " tetraalkylammonium salts, organic solvents in EKC separations has been demonstrated with phenol test mixtures. In addition, phenols have been chosen to introduce the applicability of more exotic EKC secondary phases such as SDS modified by bovine serum albumin, water-soluble calixarene, " starburstdendrimers, " " cationic replaceable polymeric phases, ionenes, amphiphilic block copolymers,polyelectrolye complexes,and liposome-coated capillaries. The separation of phenols of environmental interest as well as the sources and transformations of chlorophenols in the natural environment have been revised. Examples of the investigation of phenols by EKC methodologies in aquatic systems, soil," " and gas phase are compiled in Table 31.3. Figure 31.3 illustrates the electromigration separation of phenols by both CZE and EKC modes. 

---