Surfactant-type

AH corrosion inhibitors in use as of this writing are oil-soluble surfactants (qv) which consist of a hydrophobic hydrocarbon backbone and a hydrophilic functional group. Oil-soluble surfactant-type additives were first used in 1946 by the Sinclair Oil Co. (38). Most corrosion inhibitors are carboxyhc acids (qv), amines, or amine salts (39), depending on the types of water bottoms encountered in the whole distribution system. The wrong choice of inhibitors can lead to unwanted reactions. Eor instance, use of an acidic corrosion inhibitor when the water bottoms are caustic can result in the formation of insoluble salts that can plug filters in the distribution system or in customers vehicles. Because these additives form a strongly adsorbed impervious film at the metal Hquid interface, low Hquid concentrations are usually adequate. Concentrations typically range up to 5 ppm. In many situations, pipeline companies add their own corrosion inhibitors on top of that added by refiners. 

Mineral acids are used as catalysts, usually in a concentration of 20— 40 wt % and temperatures of 30—60°C. An efficient surfactant, preferably one that is soluble in the acid-phase upon completion of the reaction, is needed to emulsify the a-pinene and acid. The surfactant can then be recycled with the acid. Phosphoric acid is the acid commonly used in the pine oil process. Its mild corrosion characteristics and its moderate strength make it more manageable, especially because the acid concentration is constandy changing in the process by the consumption of water. Phosphoric acid is also mild enough to prevent any significant dehydration of the alcohols formed in the process. Optimization of a process usually involves considerations of acid type and concentration, temperature, surfactant type and amount, and reaction time. The optimum process usually gives a maximum of alcohols with the minimum amount of hydrocarbons and cineoles. 

Surfactant-type antistats find the widest use because of thek low cost and minimal effect on the mechanical properties of the plastic. Ease of use is another favorable aspect to surfactants. They can be mixed with the bulk of the plastic prior to processing or can be appHed to the surface of the finished plastic article as the need dictates. 

Fig. 5. Effect of surfactant type on surface resistivity, (a) Concentration of surface-active compound in low density polyethylene (LDPE) requked to achieve 10 Q/sq surface resistivity and (b) effect on surface resistivity of an acrylic polymer. Concentration of surface-active compound is 0.3%.

Since surfactant-type antistats function by attracting atmospheric moisture to the plastic, the relative humidity (rh) has a significant effect on antistat performance (Fig. 6). Relative humidity also has an effect on charge generation (Table 7). 

Mazu PPG-Mazet Chemicals, Inc. wide variety of sihcone and ethoxylated surfactant types... 

Table 4. Apparent hypochromicities of surfactant-type models of nucleic acid...

A central task for modern surfactant types in household and cosmetic use is good applicational behavior—foaming, wetting properties, hardness sensitivity, and so on—combined with reasonable dermatological properties. This chapter will give an overview about one of these the sulfosuccinates (Fig. 1). 

R., Khaledi, M. G. Quantitative structure-activity relationships studies with micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Influence of surfactant type and mixed micelles on estimation of hydrophobicity and bioavailability. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 727, 323-335. 

It was discovered that viscosifying the acid showed a remarkable improvement in acid fluid loss control. The enhancement was most pronounced in very-low-permeability limestone cores. The nature of the viscosifying agent also influenced the success. Polymeric materials were more effective than surfactant-type viscosifiers [682]. 

Applications Various surfactant types (ABS, AES, secondary alkane sulfonates, and alkylphenol ethoxy-sulfates) have been analysed by means of a QQQ using a thermospray source [89]. Other applications of hyphenated thermospray ionisation mass-spectrometric techniques (LC-TSP-MS) are described elsewhere (Section 73.3.2). 

Figure 9.1 Direct esterification by dehydration in the presence of a surfactant-type catalyst in water.

The common concentration of a surfactant used in a formulation varies from 0.05 to 0.5% and depends on the surfactant type and the solids content of the dispersion. In practice, very often combinations of surfactants rather than single agents are used to prepare and stabilize disperse systems. The combination of a more hydrophilic surfactant with a more hydrophobic surfactant leads to the formation of a complex film at the interface. A good example for such a surfactant pair is the Tween-Span system of Atlas-ICI [71]. 

Oil/water interfacial tensions were measured for a number of heavy crude oils at temperatures up to 200°C using the spinning drop technique. The influences of spinning rate, surfactant type and concentration, NaCI and CaCI2 concentrations, and temperature were studied. The heavy oil type and pH (in the presence of surfactant) had little effect on interfacial tensions. Instead, interfacial tensions depended strongly on the surfactant type, temperature, and NaCI and CaCL concentrations. Low interfacial tensions (<0.1 mN/m) were difficult to achieve at elevated temperatures. 

Surfactant Type Source % Acti ve Equivalent Weight... 

For results where comparisons could be made, the interfacial tension behavior was practically independent of the type of heavy oil used. Interfacial tensions strongly depended on the surfactant type, temperature, and NaCI and CaCI2 concentrations. Changes in the structure of the amphiphile at the oil/water interface is affected by these variables and accounted for some of the experimental observations. 

Other anionic surfactant types include the alkylisethionates (9.22), N-acylsarcosides (9.23), N-acyltaurides (9.24) and perfluorinated carboxylates, sulphonates (e.g. 9.25), sulphates and phosphates [13]. 

What characterizes surfactants is their ability to adsorb onto surfaces and to modify the surface properties. At the gas/liquid interface this leads to a reduction in surface tension. Fig. 4.1 shows the dependence of surface tension on the concentration for different surfactant types [39]. It is obvious from this figure that the nonionic surfactants have a lower surface tension for the same alkyl chain length and concentration than the ionic surfactants. The second effect which can be seen from Fig. 4.1 is the discontinuity of the surface tension-concentration curves with a constant value for the surface tension above this point. The breakpoint of the curves can be correlated to the critical micelle concentration (cmc) above which the formation of micellar aggregates can be observed in the bulk phase. These micelles are characteristic for the ability of surfactants to solubilize hydrophobic substances in aqueous solution. So the concentration of surfactant in the washing liquor has at least to be right above the cmc. 

---