Enantiomeric analytes separation

Many times an analyte must be derivatized to improve detection. When this derivatization takes place is incredibly important, especially in regards to chiral separations. Papers cited in this chapter employ both precolumn and postcolumn derivatization. Since postcolumn derivatization takes place after the enantiomeric separation it does not change the way the analyte separates on the chiral stationary phase. This prevents the need for development of a new chiral separation method for the derivatized analyte. A chiral analyte that has been derivatized before the enantiomeric separation may not interact with the chiral stationary phase in the same manner as the underivatized analyte. This change in interactions can cause a decrease or increase in the enantioselectivity. A decrease in enantioselectivity can result when precolumn derivatization modifies the same functional groups that contribute to enantioselectivity. For example, chiral crown ethers can no longer separate amino acids that have a derivatized amine group because the protonated primary amine is... 

While Pasteur made the historical discovery, subsequent advances in the resolution of enantiomers by crystallization were based on empirical results. Several attempts to separate enantiomers using paper chromatography were met with unsystematic results. In 1952 Dalgliesh postulated that three points of simultaneous interaction between the enantiomeric analyte and the stationary phase are required for the separation of enantiomers [2]. 

Under reversed-phase elution conditions, the nature of organic modiher has a very important role on the separation. Thus, methanol proved to provide better enantioselectivity than acetonitrile for the separation of ergotamine on a vancomycin and teicoplanin stationary phase [129]. The buffer concentration also has an influence on the retention of the enantiomeric analytes. An increase in buffer concentration produces a decrease in the retention of the two enantiomers. It was found that in some cases the two stationary phases, teicoplanin and vancomycin, are complementary for a poor separation on vancomycin, the stationary phase produced a baseline separation on teicoplanin and vice versa [129]. 

Method development for chiral separation is a multidisciplinary task. It requires knowledge of stereochemistry, organic chemistry, and separation techniques. Separation of enantiomers is not linked to a certain technique (i.e., GC, HPLC, etc.) but rather to an understanding of the specific interactions between the enantiomeric analytes and a certain chiral stationary phase. Knowing these types of relationships will enable one to easily understand the formation of transient diastereomeric complexes between enantiomers and a chiral stationary phase during a chromatographic separation as well as their stereochemical relationship within the complex. Once such dependencies are established, development of a method for the separation of enantiomers becomes an easy process. Based on such a relationship, chiral stationary phases can be divided in five categories [161] ... 

Type IV includes chiral phases that usually interact with the enantiomeric analytes through the formation of metal complexes. There are usually used to separate amino acid enantiomers. These types of phases are also called ligand exchange phases. The transient diastereomeric complexes are ternary metal complexes between a transitional metal (usually Cu +), an amino acid enantiomeric analyte, and another compound immobilized on the CSP which is able to undergo complexation with the transitional metal (see also the ligand exchange section. Section 22.5). The two enantiomers are separated based on the difference in the stability constant of the two diastereomeric species. The mobile phases used to separate such enantiomeric analytes are usually aqueous solutions of copper (II) salts such as copper sulfate or copper acetate. To modulate the retention, several parameters—such as the pH of the mobile phase, the concentration of the copper ion, or the addition of an organic modifier such as acetonitrile or methanol in the mobile phase—can be varied. 

Separation of enantiomers is a technique driven mainly by the needs of pharmaceutical industry to produce drugs with controlled enantiomeric purity. Enantiomeric separation involves more than knowledge of chromatography it requires an in-depth assessment of the stereochemistry of enantiomeric analytes and chiral stationary phase, as well as the interactions involved therein. In this situation, chromatography is just a tool that helps to separate enantiomers. That is why this chapter presents the main types of interactions occurring between the selectands and the selectors. Understanding these relationships, chiral separation becomes a logical process and trial and error is minimized. 

Chiral surfactants used in MEEKC have also been like dodecoxycarbonylvaline (DDCV) for the separation of different enantiomeric analytes [46,47]. Chiral polymeric surfactant has been also employed in the enantiomeric resolution of barbiturate, binaphthyl, and paveroUne [48],... 

The approach proposed by Schweitz, Nilsson and coworkers seems to be more promising for pseudoaffmity CEC. This approach establishes a continuous, macroporous MI stationary phase within the capillary. In the usual protocol, a mixture of MAA (functional monomer), TRIM (cross-linker) and the template (e.g., R-propranolol), is polymerized in situ by UV-initiated radical polymerization at a temperature of-20°C. The resulting capillaries have been used in enantioselective CEC for the separation of rac-propranolol. Baseline separations of the enantiomeric analytes could be demonstrated (Fig. 7.8) as well as separations of structurally related racemates. ... 

Our group also demonstrated another combinatorial approach in which a CSP carrying a library of enantiomerically pure potential selectors was used directly to screen for enantioselectivity in the HPLC separation of target analytes [93, 94]. The best selector of the bound mixture for the desired separation was then identified in a few deconvolution steps. As a result of the parallelism advantage , the number of columns that had to be screened in this deconvolution process to identify the single most selective selector CSP was much smaller than the number of actual selectors in the library. 

Discrimination between the enantiomers of a racemic mixture is a complex task in analytical sciences. Because enantiomers differ only in their structural orientation, and not in their physico-chemical properties, separation can only be achieved within an environment which is unichiral. Unichiral means that a counterpart of the race-mate to be separated consists of a pure enantiomeric form, or shows at least enrichment in one isomeric form. Discrimination or separation can be performed by a wide variety of adsorption techniques, e.g. chromatography in different modes and electrophoresis. As explained above, the enantioseparation of a racemate requires a non-racemic counterpart, and this can be presented in three different ways ... 

Macaudiere et al. first reported the enantiomeric separation of racemic phosphine oxides and amides on native cyclodextrin-based CSPs under subcritical conditions [53]. The separations obtained were indicative of inclusion complexation. When the CO,-methanol eluent used in SFC was replaced with hexane-ethanol in LC, reduced selectivity was observed. The authors proposed that the smaller size of the CO, molecule made it less likely than hexane to compete with the analyte for the cyclodextrin cavity. 

Enantiomeric separations have proven to be one of the most successful applications of packed column SEC. Despite initial reluctance, many analysts now use SEC routinely for both analytical and preparative chiral separations. Additional studies of chiral recognition in SEC and continued improvements in instrumentation will ensure a prominent role for SEC in chiral separations methodology in the future. 

---