Purge water, disposal

Personnel and equipment need to be decontaminated in the CRZ. However, the CRZ might be a small area immediately adjacent to the remediation area, which workers are aware of, and is also marked appropriately. Although the CRZ is less formal and likely does not have many decontamination stations, efforts should be made to make sure that personnel and equipment are appropriately cleaned. Many times, due to the logistics of a smaller job, disposal of wastes becomes difficult. If purge water is drummed and left on the site, it is imperative that it is identified, labeled properly, recorded in the site log, and disposed of in the proper manner (in accordance with applicable, local, state, federal, or other regulations). 

Providing for storage or disposal of contaminated materials (e.g., decontamination solutions, disposable equipment, drilling muds and cuttings, well-development fluids, well-purging water, and spill-contaminated materials)... 

Total dissolved solids (TDS) levels in purge water have posed water quality issues, especially at refineries fhaf discharge into small or impacted bodies of water. These TDS issues have lead to significant permit delays and disposal cost issues. 

Dispose of the purged water and decontamination wastewater into drums or other holding vessels. 

In early designs, the reaction heat typically was removed by cooling water. Crude dichloroethane was withdrawn from the reactor as a liquid, acid-washed to remove ferric chloride, then neutralized with dilute caustic, and purified by distillation. The material used for separation of the ferric chloride can be recycled up to a point, but a purge must be done. This creates waste streams contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons which must be treated prior to disposal. 

The catalyst dust is then separated from the resulting carbon dioxide stream via cyclones and/or electrostatic precipitators and is sent off-site for disposal or treatment. Generated wastewater is typically sour water from the fractionator containing some oil and phenols. Wastewater containing metal impurities from the feed oil can also be generated from the steam used to purge and regenerate catalysts. 

Most refinery process units and equipment are manifolded into a collection unit, called the blowdown system. Blowdown systems provide for the safe handling and disposal of liquids and gases that are either automatically vented from the process units through pressure relief valves, or that are manually drawn from units. Recirculated process streams and cooling water streams are often manually purged to prevent the continued buildup of contaminants in the stream. Part or all of the contents of equipment can also be purged to the blowdown system prior to shutdown before normal or emergency shutdowns. 

Flashback protection is required for H2S flaring systems, either by water seal or continuous gas purge. If a water seal is used, special requirements apply to the disposal of the effluent seal water. In the case of an HjS flaring system handling a flow of HjS which in uninterrupted throughout the period that a plant is in operation, and which stops only when the producing plant is shutdown, then flashback protection is not required. However, steam or inert gas connections are required to permit purging the flare line startup and shutdown. 

In order to remove the suspended solids, the purge treatment system contains a clarifier to separate the suspended solids and a filter press or dewatering bins to concentrate the solids into a filter cake, which is cohesive and can be readily disposed. The scrubber purge enters the clarifier from a deaeration tank. The solids settle out in the clarifier and are removed from the clarifier in the underflow. The underflow from the clarifier is sent to a filter press or dewatering bins where the excess water is removed. The solids are sent to disposal while the water is returned to the clarifier. The effluent is then sent to the oxidation towers. 

Site investigation and remediation projects usually include the disposal of investigation-derived waste (IDW), for example, soil from cuttings or excavations, equipment decontamination water, purged groundwater from well installation, etc. To determine whether these waste streams may be hazardous, we should consider their source, and, if necessary, chemically characterize the streams for the determination of disposal options. The disposal facility acceptance criteria would be the action levels in this case. 

The solution is transferred with a disposable pipet to a 200-mL conical beaker, aided by a few drops of water. The beaker is placed in a nitrogen tilled desiccator. The desiccator lid is fltted with two glass tubes in a two-hole stopper. The nitrogen inlet tube extends to the bottom of the desiccator. The outlet tube is flush with the bottom of the stopper. After purging the desiccator with nitrogen for 15 min, the flow is reduced to one bubble every 2 sec from an oil bubbler. The desiccator is left at room temperature for 1 to 4 weeks. 

The Stringfellow Superfund site in California poses analytical problems similar to those encountered with most waste sites across the United States and that may be best addressed via LC/MS based methods. Most of the organic compounds in aqueous leachates from this site cannot be characterized by GC/MS based methods. Analysis of Stringfellow bedrock groundwater shows that only 0.78% of the total dissolved organic materials are identifiable via purge and trap analysis (IQ). These are compounds such as acetone, trichloroethylene etc, whose physical properties are ideally suited for GC/MS separation and confirmation. Another 33% of the dissolved organic matter is characterized as "unknown", i.e., not extractable from the aqueous samples under any pH conditions and thus not analyzed via GC. Another 66% is 4-chlorobenzene sulfonic acid (PCBSA), an extremely polar and water soluble compound that is also not suitable for GC analysis. This compound, a waste product from DDT manufacture, is known to occur at this site because of the history of disposal of "sulfuric acid waste from industrial DDT synthesis. 

The water in the absorber is thus recycled. What have we neglected to include with the recycle A purge. If the natural gas contains impurities that are soluble in water, but have boiling points comparable to water, the impurities will accumulate in the absorber-distiller loop. Which stream should we purge Obviously, it is easier to dispose of the stream after the distiller. And if we purge, we must replenish the loss of water in the loop. We add a combiner for the make-up stream. 

Water is evaporated and trapped from aqueous or moist samples as well. Most of which is disposed of by the dry purge step, particularly when using Tenax adsorption traps with low water retention. Residual moisture can still be transferred to the GC column during the desorption step (Madden and Lehan, 1991). As the resolution of highly volatile substances on capillary columns would be impaired and the detection by the mass spectrometer would be affected, additional devices are used to remove water. In particular, where the P T technique is used with ECD or MS as detectors, reliable water removal is necessary. Different technical solutions working automated during the desorption phase are in use with the P8dT instruments of different manufacturers. 

---