Diffusion experimental measurement

From centrifugation and solvent dynamics to viscosity and diffusion, experimental measurements and their quantitative representations are the core of the discussion. The book reveals several experiments never before recognized as revealing polymer solution properties. A novel approach to relaxation phenomena accurately describes viscoelasticity and dielectric relaxation, and how they depend on polymer size and concentration. 

Film Theory. Many theories have been put forth to explain and correlate experimentally measured mass transfer coefficients. The classical model has been the film theory (13,26) that proposes to approximate the real situation at the interface by hypothetical "effective" gas and Hquid films. The fluid is assumed to be essentially stagnant within these effective films making a sharp change to totally turbulent flow where the film is in contact with the bulk of the fluid. As a result, mass is transferred through the effective films only by steady-state molecular diffusion and it is possible to compute the concentration profile through the films by integrating Fick s law ... 

Reviews of concentration polarization have been reported (14,38,39). Because solute wall concentration may not be experimentally measurable, models relating solute and solvent fluxes to hydrodynamic parameters are needed for system design. The Navier-Stokes diffusion—convection equation has been numerically solved to calculate wall concentration, and thus the water flux and permeate quaUty (40). 

Diffusion within the largest cavities of a porous medium is assumed to be similar to ordinary or bulk diffusion except that it is hindered by the pore walls (see Eq. 5-236). The tortuosity T that expresses this hindrance has been estimated from geometric arguments. Unfortunately, measured values are often an order of magnitude greater than those estimates. Thus, the effective diffusivity D f (and hence t) is normally determined by comparing a diffusion model to experimental measurements. The normal range of tortuosities for sihca gel, alumina, and other porous solids is 2 < T < 6, but for activated carbon, 5 < T < 65. 

The value of 0/ is calculated from Eq. (14-142). The term Dg is an eddy-diffusion coefficient that is obtained from experimental measurements. For sieve plates, Barker and Self [Chem. E/ig. Sci., 17,, 541 (1962)] obtained the Following correlation ... 

For adsorbent materials, experimental tortuosity factors generally fall in the range 2-6 and generally decrease as the particle porosity is increased. Higher apparent values may be obtained when the experimental measurements are affected by other resistances, while v ues much lower than 2 generally indicate that surface or solid diffusion occurs in parallel to pore diffusion. 

The process requires the interchange of atoms on the atomic lattice from a state where all sites of one type, e.g. the face centres, are occupied by one species, and the cube corner sites by the other species in a face-centred lattice. Since atomic re-aiTangement cannot occur by dhect place-exchange, vacant sites must play a role in the re-distribution, and die rate of the process is controlled by the self-diffusion coefficients. Experimental measurements of the... 

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. 

The non-bonded interaction energy, the van-der-Waals and electrostatic part of the interaction Hamiltonian are best determined by parametrizing a molecular liquid that contains the same chemical groups as the polymers against the experimentally measured thermodynamical and dynamical data, e.g., enthalpy of vaporization, diffusion coefficient, or viscosity. The parameters can then be transferred to polymers, as was done in our case, for instance in polystyrene (from benzene) [19] or poly (vinyl alcohol) (from ethanol) [20,21]. 

From these considerations we conclude that diffusion-limited bimolecular rate constants are of the order 10 -10 M s . If an experimentally measured rate constant is of this magnitude, the usual conclusion is, therefore, that it is diffusion limited. For example, this extremely important reaction (in water)... 

Equations (4-5) and (4-7) are alternative expressions for the estimation of the diffusion-limited rate constant, but these equations are not equivalent, because Eq. (4-7) includes the assumption that the Stokes-Einstein equation is applicable. Olea and Thomas" measured the kinetics of quenching of pyrene fluorescence in several solvents and also measured diffusion coefficients. The diffusion coefficients did not vary as t) [as predicted by Eq. (4-6)], but roughly as Tf. Thus Eq. (4-7) is not valid, in this system, whereas Eq. (4-5), used with the experimentally measured diffusion coefficients, gave reasonable agreement with measured rate constants. 

Despite the plethora of data in the scientific literature on thermophysical quantities of substances and mixtures, many important data gaps exist. Predictive capabilities have been developed for problems such as vapor-liquid equihbrium properties, gas-phase and—less accmately—liquid-phase diffusivities, aud solubilities of uouelectrolytes. Yet there are many areas where improved predictive models would be of great value. Au accrrrate and rehable predictive model can obviate the need for costly, extensive experimental measurements of properties that are critical in chemical manufactming processes. 

At a close level of scrutiny, real systems behave differently than predicted by the axial dispersion model but the model is useful for many purposes. Values for Pe can be determined experimentally using transient experiments with nonreac-tive tracers. See Chapter 15. A correlation for D that combines experimental and theoretical results is shown in Figure 9.6. The dimensionless number, udt/D, depends on the Reynolds number and on molecular diffusivity as measured by the Schmidt number, Sc = but the dependence on Sc is weak for... 

As with previous kinetic applications of SECM, it should be noted that experimental measurements can be tuned to the kinetic region of interest by varying the radius of the electrode [Eq. (33)] and the separation between the tip and interface. In essence, the smaller the UME, and/or tip-interface separation, the higher the diffusion rates that may be generated and, consequently, the greater the tendency for interfacial kinetic limitations. 

From experimentally measured sensor signals as functions of distance X we estimated the coefficients of diffusion for protium and deuterium. At T = 345 K they are equal to 1.56-10 and I.OO-IO" m/s, respectively. 

If the far exceeds the cylinder length, over which experimental measurements of diffusion distribution of EEPs are taken, then the EEP radiative term found in expression (5.10) may be neglected. If such an approximation cannot be done, then the rate constant of radiative decay should be taken into consideration in processing the experimental data. 

According to Eq. (4.3.13) the differential capacity of the diffuse layer Cd has a minimum at 2 = 0, i.e. at E = Epzc. It follows from Eq. (4.3.1) and Fig. 4.5 that the differential capacity of the diffuse layer Cd has a significant effect on the value of the total differential capacity C at low electrolyte concentrations. Under these conditions, a capacity minimum appears on the experimentally measured C-E curve at E — Epzc. The value of Epzc can thus be determined from the minimum of C at low electrolyte concentrations (millimolar or lower). 

In Eqs. (40)-(42), cM and cb2 are experimentally measurable and the aqueous diffusion layer thickness can be estimated theoretically. Therefore, the only unknowns are the solute concentrations at the interfaces, csl and cs2. Their estimation is shown below. 

Several mechanisms are involved in the permeability through Caco-2 cells. In order to obtain a more pure measure of membrane permeability, an experimental method based on ghost erythrocytes (red blood cells which have been emptied of their intracellular content) and diffusion constant measurements using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been proposed [108]. 

Fig. 7. Predicted diffusion coefficients for hydrogen (H) and deuterium (D) in niobium, as calculated by Schober and Stoneham (1988) from a model taking account of tunneling between various states of vibrational excitation and comparison with experimental measurements (solid lines). Theoretical curves are shown both for a model using harmonic vibrational wave functions (dashed lines) and for a model with anharmonic corrections (dashed-dotted lines).

Experimental measurements of DH in a-Si H using SIMS were first performed by Carlson and Magee (1978). A sample is grown that contains a thin layer in which a small amount (=1-3 at. %) of the bonded hydrogen is replaced with deuterium. When annealed at elevated temperatures, the deuterium diffuses into the top and bottom layers and the deuterium profile is measured using SIMS. The diffusion coefficient is obtained by subtracting the control profile from the annealed profile and fitting the concentration values to the expression, valid for diffusion from a semiinfinite source into a semi-infinite half-plane (Crank, 1956),... 

Let us reconsider the critical flame temperature criterion for extinction. Williams [25], in a review of flame extinction, reports the theoretical adiabatic flame temperatures for different fuels in counter-flow diffusion flame experiments. These temperatures decreased with the strain rate (ua0/x), and ranged from 1700 to 2300 K. However, experimental measured temperatures in the literature tended to be much lower (e.g. Williams [25] reports 1650 K for methane, 1880 K for iso-octane and 1500 K for methylmethracrylate and heptane). He concludes that 1500 50 K can represent an approximate extinction temperature for many carbon-hydrogen-oxygen fuels burning in oxygen-nitrogen mixtures without chemical inhibitors . 

S. J. Madsen, B. C. Wilson, M. S. Patterson, Y. D. Park, S. L. Jacques, and Y. Hefetz. Experimental tests of a simple diffusion model for the estimation of scattering and absorption coefficients of turbid media from time-resolved diffuse reflectance measurements. Applied Optics, 31 3509-3517, 1992. 

The surface potential is not accessible by direct experimental measurement it can be calculated from the experimentally determined surface charge (Eqs. 3.1 - 3.3) by Eqs. (3.3a) and (3.3b). The zeta potential, calculated from electrophoretic measurements is typically lower than the surface potential, y, calculated from diffuse double layer theory. The zeta potential reflects the potential difference between the plane of shear and the bulk phase. The distance between the surface and the shear plane cannot be defined rigorously. 

Although a mechanism for stress relaxation was described in Section 1.3.2, the Deborah number is purely based on experimental measurements, i.e. an observation of a bulk material behaviour. The Peclet number, however, is determined by the diffusivity of the microstructural elements, and is the dimensionless group given by the timescale for diffusive motion relative to that for convective or flow. The diffusion coefficient, D, is given by the Stokes-Einstein equation ... 

---