Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison with experiments

We can now make use of the above analysis to extract the value of the weak charge Qw from experiment. The PNC amplitudes measimed by Wood et. al. [5] are [Pg.513]

A comparison of experimental and theoretical values of p has been reported by Flory for a mixture of a tricarboxylic acid with a diol and a diacid the results are given in Table 2.3. [Pg.44]

The statistical equation underestimates p whereas Equation 2.24 overestimates the experimental value. The Carothers equation leads to a high p beeause molecules larger than the observed exist in the mixture, and these undergo gelation before the predicted value is attained. This difficulty is overcome in the statistieal treatment. [Pg.44]

FIGURE 2.5 Variation of the viscosity if] and the degree of polymerization x with the extent of network polymer formation in the system diethylene glycol + succinic acid -I- 1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid. (Data from Flory.) [Pg.45]

3-Propanetricarboxylic Acid, Diethylene Glycol, and Adipic Acid or Succinic Acid System [Pg.45]

The parameter X12 in equation (3.77) is the sole adjustable parameter of the free volume theory when comparison is effected with experiment. The theory predicts that x increases with the segment fraction j 2, as found experimentally for some systems (see Fig. 3.10). Values of A, 2 are always found to be positive and fall into two well-defined groups depending upon the chemical constitution of the polymer and the solvent. For aliphatic-aliphatic interactions, A, 2 10Jcm whereas for aliphatic-aromatic interactions, Af,2 40Jcm . These relative magnitudes seem intuitively reasonable. [Pg.56]

Although some systems (e.g. poly(isobutylene) in benzene) display good [Pg.56]

Calculations of connectivity indexes and subsequent dielectric constant predictions were accomplished by using Molecular Simulations Inc. Synthia polymer module running under the Insight II interface on a Silicon Graphics Crimson workstation. All calculations were performed on the polymer s repeat unit, which was first energy-minimized through a molecular-mechanics-based algorithm. [Pg.220]

Experimental values were obtained from a number of sources. Table [Pg.220]

1 identifies the structure of repeat units of all tlie polyimides mentioned in this work. Table 12.2 gives experimental data for dielectric constants obtained with dry [Pg.220]

Polyimide Predicted Predicted Experimental Diff % Diff. [Pg.224]

Poly imide Cohesive Predicted Experimental Diff. % Diff. [Pg.225]

Although the treatment of rubber elasticity given in the preceding section is generally rather successful, certain discrepancies are found to occur. The first [Pg.9]

The second term clearly becomes insigniflcant at large values of r. [Pg.10]

Finally, there is no evidence that isolated chains in theta solvents fail to conform to Gaussian statistics, so that the C2 discrepancy appears to arise only when the molecular chains are tied into a network. [Pg.10]

A second discrepancy between theory and experiment is found when the Gaussian part of the measured stresses is compared with the theoretical result for an ideal network. Numerical differences of up to 50% are obtained between the density of effective chains calculated from the observed stresses and that calculated from the chemistry of crosslinking. This discrepancy may be due to an error in the theoretical treatment as given here. James and Guth (1943, 1949) arrived at stresses only half as large as those given in Eq. (1.10), from a somewhat different theoretical standpoint. [Pg.10]

A third and major discrepancy, already referred to, is found at large deformations when the network chains fail to obey Gaussian statistics, even approximately. Considerable success is achieved in this case by using Eq. (1.5) in place of Eq. (1.1) for chain tensions in the network. [Pg.10]

Polyimide Predicted cohesive energy (kJ/mol) Predicted dielectric constant Experimental dielectric constant ( 10MHz) Diff. % Diff. [Pg.224]

The quantity 2) the dimensions of a temperature and is called the Debye characteristic temperature of the particular substance. According to (13 59) Cyis the same function of the ratio Tjdj for all substances, and the heat capacity per mole may therefore be written [Pg.411]

The same considerations apply to the Einstein theory. An Einstein characteristic temperature Og may be defined by the relation [Pg.411]

It will be seen from (13 62) that 6 is the temperature at which kT becomes equal to hv y the separation of the vibrational energy levels according to the Einstein model. It is in the temperature region between 0 1 and djg that increases most rapidly because it is in [Pg.411]

In Fig. 43 the lower curve represents the value of Cf as a function of Tjds, as calculated from equation (13 63) of the Einstein theory. The upper curve represents Cfr as a function of according to equation (13 59) of the Debye theory. (Tabulat values of the [Pg.412]

The limiting values of Cy are the same on both theories, namely, 3R at high temperature and approaching zero at the absolute zero. But at intermediate values of TjO the Einstein theory predicts lower values of Cy, and as mentioned previously, these values approach zero too rapidly, w hen compared with experimental results. [Pg.412]


A more useful quantity for comparison with experiment is the heat of formation, which is defined as the enthalpy change when one mole of a compound is formed from its constituent elements in their standard states. The heat of formation can thus be calculated by subtracting the heats of atomisation of the elements and the atomic ionisation energies from the total energy. Unfortunately, ab initio calculations that do not include electron correlation (which we will discuss in Chapter 3) provide uniformly poor estimates of heats of formation w ith errors in bond dissociation energies of 25-40 kcal/mol, even at the Hartree-Fock limit for diatomic molecules. [Pg.105]

HyperChem quantum mechanical calculations are ab initio and semi-empirical. Ab initio calculations use parameters (contracted basis functions) associated with shells, such as an s shell, sp shell, etc., or atomic numbers (atoms). Semi-empirical calculations use parameters associated with specific atomic numbers. The concept of atom types is not used in the conventional quantum mechanics methods. Semi-empirical quantum mechanics methods use a rigorous quantum mechanical formulation combined with the use of empirical parameters obtained from comparison with experiment. If parameters are available for the atoms of a given molecule, the ab initio and semi-empirical calculations have an a priori aspect when compared with a molecular mechanics calculation, letting... [Pg.215]

The frequency analysis step involves estimating the likelihood of occurrence of each of the undesired situations defined in the hazard identification step. Sometimes you can do this through direct comparison with experience or extrapolation from historical accident data. While this method may be of great assistance in determining accident frequencies, most accidents analyzed by QRA are so rare that the frequencies must be synthesized using frequency estimation methods and models. [Pg.36]

Computer simulation can be used to provide a stepping stone between experiment and the simplified analytical descriptions of the physical behavior of biological systems. But before gaining the right to do this, we must first validate a simulation by direct comparison with experiment. To do this we must compare physical quantities that are measurable or derivable from measurements with the same quantities derived from simulation. If the quantities agree, we then have some justification for using the detailed information present in the simulation to interpret the experiments. [Pg.238]

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. [Pg.238]

Having made the comparison with experiment one may then make an assessment as to whether the simulation agrees sufficiently well to be useful in interpreting the experiment in detail. In cases where the agreement is not good, the detennination of the cause of the discrepancy is often instructive. The errors may arise from the simulation model or from the assumptions used in the experimental data reduction or both. In cases where the quantities examined agree, the simulation can be decomposed so as to isolate the principal components responsible for the observed intensities. Sometimes, then, the dynamics involved can be described by a simplified concept derived from the simulation. [Pg.238]

Comparison with experiments using defined coupling chain.s... [Pg.230]

Ideally, experiments and simulations should be performed simultaneously, and the results obtained should complement each other. The computer model for a basic configuration can be verified by comparison with experiment and then applied to more complex configurations. [Pg.1028]

It is important to mention that for most applications the special form of the force field is not as important as the actual values of the parameters. These parameters are determined in a number of ways, mainly by comparison with experiments, e.g., vibrational spectroscopy. Torsional potentials, which are crucial for polymer configurations and dynamics of polymers, can... [Pg.486]

Since quench rates in simulations typically are artificially high, this leads to a special problem for comparison with experiment as well as to the question whether there is a more general way to determine the glass transition temperature from the structure of the system. The experimental definition of viscosity is certainly not apphcable to simulations. [Pg.503]

Next, Ah and Ad are written in terms of partition functions (see Section 5.2), which are in principle calculable from quantum mechanical results together with experimental vibrational frequencies. The application of this approach to mechanistic problems involves postulating alternative models of the transition state, estimating the appropriate molecular properties of the hypothetical transition state species, and calculating the corresponding k lko values for comparison with experiment.""- " "P... [Pg.296]

In this table, eis is the energy of a hydrogenic Is orbital, fi2s the energy of a hydrogenic 2s orbital. Before we worry about comparison with experiment, there are a couple of loose ends that have to be tidied up. [Pg.89]

The calculation is advanced by a suitable timestep, typically a femtosecond, and statistical data is collected for comparison with experiment. [Pg.252]

I should mention the convention that in electromagnetic studies we write oscillating fields as (e.g.) E = Eq expfjujf) rather than E = Eq cos(ju)f). There is nothing sinister in this—it just makes the maths simpler. A laboratory electric field is the real part of E = Eq exp(jujr), and so we have to remember to take the real part of any result before comparison with experiment. [Pg.298]

Both Eq. (144) and Eq. (145) give values higher than the observed data, in particular for water-glycerol systems containing lower concentrations of glycerol. It should be mentioned that, in this comparison with experiment, the assumption is made that the suspended bubbles entrained by the fluid, which describe complicated trajectories in the fluid, are moving relative to the... [Pg.349]

Temkin S. I., Burshtein A. I. On the shape of the Q-branch of Raman scattering spectra in dense media. Comparison with experiment, Chem. Phys. Lett. 66, 57-61 (1979). [Pg.286]

This calculation and its comparison with experiment hence provide us with a rough idea as to the magnitude of the inductive effect from atom to atom, as given by the ratio St/Si. If this ratio were greater than 1/i the effect of S2 would overcome that of 5i and pyridine would substitute in the a and y positions, whereas if it were less than V28 substitution would occur in the 0 positions more readily than in benzene. A value of about V10 for S2/81 seems reasonable to us from a consideration of the electronic phenomena involved. [Pg.198]

No extensive comparison with experiment to test the values in Table IV will be made. The close agreement between the purely theoretical and the experimental results in the case of helium and neon allows one to place confidence in the R values for ions with these structures and the same remark applies with less force in the case of the argon structure, where only a small empirical correction was introduced. It is interesting to note that the theoretical values 3-57 and 6-15 for the rubidium and the caesium ion agree very well with the experimental ones, 3-56 and 6-17 (Table III), which were not used at all in the evaluation of the empirical corrections for these structures. Finally, we may mention that our values agree in general with those of Fajans and WulfE.i obtained by them from the experimental R values for salt solutions by the application of only the simplest theoretical considerations. [Pg.696]


See other pages where Comparison with experiments is mentioned: [Pg.156]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.1059]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.714]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info