Data analytics fundamental

The role of the instrument in providing the integrity of data is fundamental to the end result. If the analytical practitioner cannot have faith in the reliability of the basic analytical signal within predetermined limits then the information generated will be worse than useless. Reliability of the data quality should be linked to performance standards for both modules and systems as well as having a regular maintenance programme. 

Assay application. At this point major differences appear between the historical use of clinical immunoassays and the potential applications of environmental and pesticide immunoassays. Most clinical assays have been applied to simple or well defined and consistent matrices such as urine or serum. In contrast, most matrices likely to be analyzed for pesticides are more complex, less well defined, and more variable. The potential for serious problems with matrix effects in the environmental field is far greater than most clinical immunoassays have encountered. The application of immunoassays to environmental analysis requires sampling strategies, cleanup procedures, and data handling fundamentally similar to those presently in use in any good analytical lab. The critical factor in the success of immunochemical technology will likely be competence... 

The principal tool for performance-based quality assessment is the control chart. In a control chart the results from the analysis of quality assessment samples are plotted in the order in which they are collected, providing a continuous record of the statistical state of the analytical system. Quality assessment data collected over time can be summarized by a mean value and a standard deviation. The fundamental assumption behind the use of a control chart is that quality assessment data will show only random variations around the mean value when the analytical system is in statistical control. When an analytical system moves out of statistical control, the quality assessment data is influenced by additional sources of error, increasing the standard deviation or changing the mean value. 

Increased computational resources allow the widespread application of fundamental kinetic models. Relumped single-event microkinetics constitute a subtle methodology matching present day s analytical techniques with the computational resources. The singleevent kinetic parameters are feedstock invariant. Current efforts are aimed at mapping catal) t properties such as acidity and shape selectivity. The use of fundamental kinetic models increases the reliability of extrapolations from laboratory or pilot plant data to industrial reactor simulation. 

Studies conducted in the laboratory provide fundamental data on processes by which a pesticide is degraded and on its mobility. In combination with field observations, which integrate multiple processes, these data describe a pesticide s environmental fate. This section provides a discussion of several important specific analytical issues which should be considered in the design of environmental fate studies to ensure that the data generated address the needs of scientists and regulatory agencies for information on the environmental fate and environmental and ecological impacts of a pesticide to the fullest extent. 

XRF nowadays provides accurate concentration data at major and low trace levels for nearly all the elements in a wide variety of materials. Hardware and software advances enable on-line application of the fundamental approach in either classical or influence coefficient algorithms for the correction of absorption and enhancement effects. Vendors software packages, such as QuantAS (ARL), SSQ (Siemens), X40, IQ+ and SuperQ (Philips), are precalibrated analytical programs, allowing semiquantitative to quantitative analysis for elements in any type of (unknown) material measured on a specific X-ray spectrometer without standards or specific calibrations. The basis is the fundamental parameter method for calculation of correction coefficients for matrix elements (inter-element influences) from fundamental physical values such as absorption and secondary fluorescence. UniQuant (ODS) calibrates instrumental sensitivity factors (k values) for 79 elements with a set of standards of the pure element. In this approach to inter-element effects, it is not necessary to determine a calibration curve for each element in a matrix. Calibration of k values with pure standards may still lead to systematic errors for unknown polymer samples. UniQuant provides semiquantitative XRF analysis [242]. 

Sometimes the interpretation of analytical data does not need the deepest mathematical analysis but it is sufficient to get an impression on the structure of the data. Although the basic idea of graphical data interpretation is ancient (e.g., Brinton [1914]), the fundamentals of modern explorative data analysis (EDA) has been developed in the 1960s (Tukey [1962, 1977]). 

Draper and Smith [1] discuss the application of DW to the analysis of residuals from a calibration their discussion is based on the fundamental work of Durbin, et al in the references listed at the beginning of this chapter. While we cannot reproduce their entire discussion here, at the heart of it is the fact that there are many kinds of serial correlation, including linear, quadratic and higher order. As Draper and Smith show (on p. 64), the linear correlation between the residuals from the calibration data and the predicted values from that calibration model is zero. Therefore if the sample data is ordered according to the analyte values predicted from the calibration model, a statistically significant value of the Durbin-Watson statistic for the residuals in indicative of high-order serial correlation, that is nonlinearity. 

An ideal calibration curve (Figure 2.7) is a straight line with a slope of about 45 degrees. It is prepared by making a sequence of measurements on reference materials which have been prepared with known analyte contents. The curve is fundamental to the accuracy of the method. It is thus vitally important that it represents the best fit for the calibration data. Many computer software packages, supplied routinely with various analytical instruments, provide this facility. It is, however, useful to review briefly the principles on which they are based. 

The rate of a chemical reaction and the extent to which it proceeds play an important role in analytical chemistry. The fundamental problem which faces the analyst arises because thermodynamic data will indicate the position of equilibrium that can be reached, but not the time taken to reach that position. Similarly, a compound may be thermodynamically unstable because its decomposition will lead to a net decrease in free energy, whilst a high activation energy for the decomposition reaction restricts the rate of decomposition. In practical terms such a compound would be stable, e.g. NO. It is thus essential to consider all analytical reactions from both thermodynamic and kinetic viewpoints. 

This paper explores the trade-offs of gem damage during LIBS analysis and data quality under a variety of analytical conditions. Two lasers, a Big Sky Laser Technology (now Quantel USA) Nd-YAG nano-second laser operated at its fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm, and a Raydiance, Inc., pico-second laser operated at its fundamental wavelength of 1552 nm as well as harmonics at 776, 517.2, and 388 nm, are used in separate LIBS systems. Furthermore, the use of inert gas environment (He or Ar) is explored to increase peak intensities at lower laser power and sample damage. 

The direct access to the electrical-energetic properties of an ion-in-solution which polarography and related electro-analytical techniques seem to offer, has invited many attempts to interpret the results in terms of fundamental energetic quantities, such as ionization potentials and solvation enthalpies. An early and seminal analysis by Case etal., [16] was followed up by an extension of the theory to various aromatic cations by Kothe et al. [17]. They attempted the absolute calculation of the solvation enthalpies of cations, molecules, and anions of the triphenylmethyl series, and our Equations (4) and (6) are derived by implicit arguments closely related to theirs, but we have preferred not to follow their attempts at absolute calculations. Such calculations are inevitably beset by a lack of data (in this instance especially the ionization energies of the radicals) and by the need for approximations of various kinds. For example, Kothe et al., attempted to calculate the electrical contribution to the solvation enthalpy by Born s equation, applicable to an isolated spherical ion, uninhibited by the fact that they then combined it with half-wave potentials obtained for planar ions at high ionic strength. 

All data obtained by these novel techniques require a very deep and multifaceted analysis, in order to check the principal and fundamentals variables and to reject the others. In this scenario, chemometrics provide scientists with useful tools to interpret the large amounts of data generated by these complex analytical assays and allows for quality control, classification procedures, modelling studies. Discrimination between different molecules available as novel drugs and molecules having no interesting biological activities is easy by means of multivariate analysis. 

---