Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison between Models

Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of Q for Q 1.2 F For a given Cj value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in Ap, for Ap 3. [Pg.435]

and Tang (1998) compared the same models using experimental data of the potentiometric titration and the metal adsorption isotherms for Cu and Cd using [Pg.435]

Lean River (China) sediment. The experimental data of the adsorption edges were used to verify the performance of the models. This work indicated that all three models can simulate the experimental results very well. In predicting the adsorption behavior of the sediment sample, the relative errors of these three models were quite close. [Pg.436]

Tournassat et al. (2009) compared the BSM and TLM models with molecular dynamics simulations of a montmorillonite/water interface at the pore scale in 0.1 M NaCl. Simulation-derived values were compared with macroscopic model results obtained from the classical models. Although the Na concentration profile is well reproduced in the diffuse layer, anion exclusion is overestimated by the BSM and TLM theories under the experimental conditions employed the agreement between molecular dynamics simulated and modeled diffuse-layer composition is less accurate with TLM than with BSM. However, the potentials at the three planes of interest are accurately reproduced. It was also showed that molecular dynamics simulations can be used to constrain BSM parameters or, in combination with zeta potential measurements, TLM parameters, by providing suitable values for the capacitance parameters. [Pg.436]

In a study of Br adsorption by amorphous Al and Fe oxides, montmorillonite, kaolinite, and temperate and tropical soils (Goldberg and Kabengi 2010), the CCM [Pg.436]


On the other hand, very few ncdels for nulticonponent systans have been reported in the literature. Apart from models for binary systems, usually restricted to "zero-one" systans (5) (6), the most detailed model of this type has been proposed by Hamielec et al. (7), with reference to batch, semibatch and continuous emilsion polymerization reactors. Notably, besides the usual kinetic informations (nonomer, conversion, PSD), the model allows for the evaluation of IWD, long and short chain brandling frequencies and gel content. Comparisons between model predictions and experimental data are limited to tulK and solution binary pwlymerization systems. [Pg.380]

Detailed quantitative analyses of the data allowed the production of a mathematical model, which was able to reproduce all of the characteristics seen in the experiments carried out. Comparing model profiles with the data enabled the diffusion coefficients of the various components and reaction rates to be estimated. It was concluded that oxygen inhibition and latex turbidity present real obstacles to the formation of uniformly cross-linked waterborne coatings in this type of system. This study showed that GARField profiles are sufficiently quantitative to allow comparison with simple models of physical processes. This type of comparison between model and experiment occurs frequently in the analysis of GARField data. [Pg.96]

The two-component lipid models were also characterized in the absence of sink conditions (Table 7.8). Comparisons between models 7.0 (Table 7.7) and 1.0 (Table 7.5) suggest that negative charge in the absence of sink causes the permeabilities of many of the bases to decrease. Exceptions are quinine, prazosin, primaquine, ranitidine, and especially metoprolol. The inclusion of 0.6% PA causes Pe of metoprolol to increase nearly 10-fold, to a value twice that of propranolol, a more lipophilic molecule than metoprolol (based on the octanol-water scale). Naproxen and ketoprofen become notably more permeable in the two-component system. Surprisingly, the neutral progesterone becomes significantly less permeable in this system. [Pg.181]

With models being formulated by many independent groups, it is inevitable that comparisons will be made in the hope of identifying the better or more useful models. Comparison between models of different classes is usually not meaningful. [Pg.177]

Yi-Jehng Kuan el al. (2004). Searches for interstellar molecules of potential prebiotic importance. Advances in Space Research 33 31-39 Yung Y., Allen M. and Pinto J. (1984). Photochemistry of the atmosphere of Titan comparison between model and observations. Astronomy Astrophysics Supplement... [Pg.333]

Comparison Between Models for Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Stereospecific Catalysts... [Pg.1]

Section 3 will deal with catalytic systems whose stereospecificity is mainly controlled by the chirality of the environment of the transition metal, independently of the possible chirality of the growing chain (chiral site stereocontrol). In particular, in Section 3.1 the chirality and stereospecificity of homogeneous catalytic systems based on metallocenes of different symmetries and in different experimental conditions will be reviewed. In Section 3.2 the chirality of model catalytic sites, which have been supposed for isospecific first-generation TiCl3-based and high-yield MgC -supported catalysts, is described. In Section 3.3 we will present a comparison between model catalytic sites proposed for heterogeneous and homogeneous stereospecific site-controlled catalysts. [Pg.8]

Figure 7.17 Comparison between models and the data for angle-ply interply interfaces... Figure 7.17 Comparison between models and the data for angle-ply interply interfaces...
Finally, ACM definitions involving MGGA functionals have also begun to appear and these are listed in Table 8.7. Improvements associated with inclusion of HF exchange in the ACM functional appear to be diminished in magnitude for MGGA functionals compared to GGA functionals, but are still noticeable. Detailed comparisons between models are provided in Section 8.6. [Pg.268]

In general, the values for all pertinent parameters given in the original literature are reported such numbers are printed in roman (upright) type. In order to facilitate comparison between models, however, some values have been deduced by the present authors from the original literature, and such numbers are typed in italic print. [Pg.8]

RSG are predicted to exhibit CNO processed elements with various rates of dilution according to initial mass. In a given area of the HR diagram, the predicted C/N and 0/N ratios present some significant scatter (cf. Figs. 1 and 2). Thus great care has to be taken about conclusions drawn from the comparisons between models and... [Pg.83]

Fig. 6.11 Comparison between modelling results and experimental data (operating pressure 1 atm operating temperature 950°C). Fig. 6.11 Comparison between modelling results and experimental data (operating pressure 1 atm operating temperature 950°C).
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the model results with the experimental results. The three curves shown in the plot correspond to three different values of the rate constant for the HOSO + O2 reaction upper - 8 x 10-13, middle - 4 x IO13, and lower - 2 x 10"13 cm3/s. Similar comparisons between model and experimental results have been made for a wide variety of other experimental conditions. Based upon such comparisons, we have concluded that a rate constant of (4 )x lu-13 cm3/s gives the best match between the experimental and model results, in both an absolute sense and based upon the shape of the O2 titration results. Since there is greater uncertainty in the absolute concentrations of HO radicals than there is in the trend of the HO concentrations with increasing O2, the comparison of the shapes of the experimental and model O2 titration profiles may provide a reliable basis for comparison. [Pg.447]

The last two sections of this paper will discuss this interplay between detailed modelling and both theory and experiment. The third section describes how a model must be tested in various limits for physical consistency to insure its accuracy. The specific example chosen here is a comparison between an analytic solution and a detailed numerical simulation of a premixed laminar flame. The last section shows how a comparison between model results and experiments can be used to calibrate the model and to guide further experiments. The example chosen is a calculation of flow over an immersed object which is compared to both experimental and theoretical results. [Pg.333]

Essentially, the conveyor belt was approximated as an ensemble of combustible particles. This approach is similar to the treatment of natural fuels such as trees and shrubs in the experimental version of FDS known as Wildland Urban Interface FDS (WFDS) [92], Fowndes et al. [91] found that the model qualitatively replicated the flame spread that was observed experimentally. However, no quantitative comparison between modeled pyrolysis front position or HRR and analogous experimental data was given. Modeling a single continuous surface, such as a conveyor belt, as an ensemble of combustible particles is a novel idea, but it is not clear in this particular case whether the relevant physics of condensed-phase pyrolysis were accurately represented. [Pg.571]

Using literature values for the various biodegradation first-order rate constants, concentrations over space and time for all the contaminants (as well as methane, chloride, and ferrous iron) were simulated. BioRedox includes a visualization module that simplifies comparison between model predictions and field measurements for the numerous compounds of interest. While the authors give an example of predicted versus measured results at several locations on the site, no attempt is made to quantify the quality of the overall prediction. [Pg.58]

Semprini L,McCarty PL (1992) Comparison between model simulations and field results for in-situ biorestoration of chlorinated aliphatics. Part 2. Cometabolic transformations. Ground Water 30 37-44... [Pg.61]

The details pertaining to the experiments along with the comparison between model predictions and experimental observations is shown in Table XL It can be seen that the agreement is favorable over a wide range of column widths, hole diameters, and numbers of holes. [Pg.100]

Ferro, D. R., Bruckner, S., Meille, S. V. and Ragazzi, M. (1992). Energy calculations for isotactic polypropylene—a comparison between models of the alpha-crystalline and gamma-crystalline structures. Macromolecules, 25, 5231-5. [182]... [Pg.336]

Cl. Comparison Between Model airf Pdlymerizatitm Studies... [Pg.45]

Sequential steps are taken imtil the model provides a statistically adequate representation of the data to within the independently obtained stochastic error structure. The comparison between model and experiment can motivate modifications to the model or to the experimental parameters. [Pg.453]

The simplest and most appealing comparison between models and experiment is through the radial distribution function, which is here denoted by g r) and defined by the equation... [Pg.346]

This modelling approach allows the description not only of the overall soot volume fraction but also of the distribution of the equivalent diameters of the carbon particles. Figure 26 shows a sample of comparisons between model... [Pg.123]

Fio. 26. Distribution of particle diameters in an ethylene sooting flame. Comparison between model predictions and the experimental data (Zhao et al., 2003). [Pg.123]

Fouling process models for both pyrolysis coils and the TLE were also verified against experimental data. Figure 30 reports a comparison between model predictions and the experimental data reported by Lohr and Dittman (1978). The time evolution of the outlet temperature from the TLE indicates that the efficiency of the heat exchangers is penalized. In the case of both an atmospheric gasoil and a vacuum one, the temperature of the process gases from the TLE... [Pg.128]

Figure 13.18. Comparison between model and measurements for clays dispersed in polymers. Viscosities observed as a function of shear rate by Krishnamoorti et al [46] for dispersions of silicate platelets (weight fractions of 0.06 and 0.13) in poly(dimethyl siloxane) at T=301K are indicated with symbols. Calculated results, assuming platelets to be monodisperse flexible cylinders with aspect ratio Af=(thickness/diameter)=0.01, are indicated as lines, (a) Relative viscosity=r)(dispersion)/r (polymer). (b) Dispersion viscosity, r)(dispersion). Figure 13.18. Comparison between model and measurements for clays dispersed in polymers. Viscosities observed as a function of shear rate by Krishnamoorti et al [46] for dispersions of silicate platelets (weight fractions of 0.06 and 0.13) in poly(dimethyl siloxane) at T=301K are indicated with symbols. Calculated results, assuming platelets to be monodisperse flexible cylinders with aspect ratio Af=(thickness/diameter)=0.01, are indicated as lines, (a) Relative viscosity=r)(dispersion)/r (polymer). (b) Dispersion viscosity, r)(dispersion).
Figure 8.14. Comparison between model predictions and data for AISI 4340 steel tested in hydrogen sulfide (at 0.133 and 2.66 kPa) [3]. Figure 8.14. Comparison between model predictions and data for AISI 4340 steel tested in hydrogen sulfide (at 0.133 and 2.66 kPa) [3].
Figure 10.5. Comparison between model predictions (a y) and measured ( exp) pit sizes in a 2024-T3 aluminum alloy exposed to 0.5 M NaCl solution at room temperature [10]. Figure 10.5. Comparison between model predictions (a y) and measured ( exp) pit sizes in a 2024-T3 aluminum alloy exposed to 0.5 M NaCl solution at room temperature [10].
Before considering methods of finding a, let us review how the concept of model distortion has allowed us to move from comparison between model and plant to a comparison between two models, in one of which we allow the nominally constant parameters to be varied. Suppo.se we drive the system to follow the recorded transients exactly. Using the superscript 0 to label the vectors associated with exact matching, the parameter variations will be given by (/), the states by X"(/) and the outputs by Y (f). Exact matching implies ... [Pg.310]

Local Heat Transfer. No general theory has been developed for local Nusselt numbers beyond the transition region, and local coefficient data are very sparse [95,96], Liu et al. [105] have divided the flow field into several regions and have developed expressions for the local Nusselt number. Limited comparisons between model predictions and experimental data at radial locations beyond the transition to turbulent flow have yielded good agreement. Correlation of experimental data of radial profiles of the local Nusselt number for turbulent, axisymmetric free-surface jets using the superposition of dual asymptote technique of Churchill and Usagi [77] has been less successful [98]. [Pg.1427]


See other pages where Comparison between Models is mentioned: [Pg.261]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.1123]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.45]   


SEARCH



Comparison between

Model comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info