Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model comparison

Murakami, S., A. Mochida, R. Ooka, S. Kato, and S. lizuka. 1996. Numerical prediction of flow around a building with various turbulence models Comparison of fe-e, EVM, ASM, DSM, and LES with wind tunnel tests. ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 102, no. I. [Pg.598]

The same conclusion can be drawn from another statistical test for model comparison namely, through the use of Aikake s information criteria (AIC) calculations. This is often preferred, especially for automated data fitting, since it is more simple than F tests and can be used with a wider variety of models. In this test, the data is fit to the various models and the SSq determined. The AIC value is then calculated with the following formula... [Pg.243]

These CD studies confirmed the binding stoichiometries of our aPNA-DNA complexes and provided further support for our binding model. Comparisons between the CD spectra of the individual components and the aPNA DNA complex suggest a template effect (not unhke that observed with certain DNA-binding proteins) where the components induce mutual conformational changes upon their interaction with each other. [Pg.214]

Tirona RG, Schwab AJ, Geng W, Pang KS. Hepatic clearance models comparison of the dispersion and Goresky models in outflow profiles from multiple indicator dilution rat liver studies. Drug Metab Dispos 1998 26 465-75. Bassingthwaighte JB, Sparks HV. Indicator dilution estimation of capillary endothelial transport. Anna Rev Physiol 1986 48 321-34. [Pg.526]

Jouzel J, G. Hoffmann G, Koster RD, Masson V (2000) Water isotopes in precipitation data/model comparison for present-day and past chmates. Quat Sci Rev 19 363-379 Kagan E, Agnon A, Bar-Matthews M, Ayalon A (2002) Cave deposits as recorders of paleoseismicity A record from two caves located 60 km west of the Dead Sea Transform (Jerusalem, Israel). In Environmental Catastrophes and Recoveries in the Holocene (onhne abstract http //atlas-conferences.com/cgi-bin/abstract/caiq-38)... [Pg.456]

With models being formulated by many independent groups, it is inevitable that comparisons will be made in the hope of identifying the better or more useful models. Comparison between models of different classes is usually not meaningful. [Pg.177]

Meyer, B.R. "Design Formulae for 2-D and 3-D Vertical Hydraulic Fractures Model Comparison and Parametric Studies," SPE paper 15240, 1986 SPE Unconventional Gas Technology Symposium, Louisville, May 18-21. [Pg.663]

It is of considerable interest to compare the present model with the predictions of the statistical theories. In particular, the results will be compared with the theories of Scheutjens and Fleer (9,10,13). These authors have pointed out that their results are in general agreement with other published models. Comparison of the adsorption isotherms shown in Figure 1 with those given by Scheutjens and Fleer (see, for example, Figure 5 of Reference 13) shows excellent qualitative agreement. In each case, the isotherms consist of three regions as described above. [Pg.29]

Ando, K., Sugiyama, A., Satoh, Y., Nakamura, Y., and Hashimoto, K., Predicting drug-induced QT prolongation using a new in vivo animal model comparison of risperidone and olanzapine, /. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, 49, 221, 2004. [Pg.287]


See other pages where Model comparison is mentioned: [Pg.294]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.1057]    [Pg.1078]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.299]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.412 , Pg.1144 , Pg.1145 , Pg.1146 , Pg.1147 , Pg.1148 , Pg.1149 , Pg.1150 ]




SEARCH



A comparison of the MO and VB bonding models

Activity prediction models comparison

Amines, 77 model compound comparisons

Analytical methods method comparison data model

Aqueous solubility, predictive model comparisons

Bonding models comparison

Cage models comparisons

Case Study Comparison of DFT Functionals on Model Phosphoryl Transfer Reactions

Classes of model for comparison with experiment

Comparison Between Models and Experiments

Comparison Between the Various Kinetic Models

Comparison Data Model

Comparison between Different Models

Comparison between Experimental Results Obtained with Hydroxylated Polyacids and some Theoretical Models

Comparison between Models

Comparison between Simulation and Theory of the Rouse Model

Comparison of DPF and TIS Models

Comparison of EQ and NEQ Models

Comparison of Model Predictions with Experiment

Comparison of Modeling and Experimental Results

Comparison of Pitzer and HKF Models

Comparison of Various Models

Comparison of Young s modulus from forceindentation curves using Hertz elastic and JKR model

Comparison of different models

Comparison of model and experimental

Comparison of model and experimental data

Comparison of model and experimental results

Comparison of reaction models

Comparison of regression models

Comparison of the Different Models

Comparison of the LCP and VSEPR Models

Comparison of the Langevin-network model with experiments

Comparison of the Models

Comparison of the Modified Campbell-Dontula Model with Experimental Data

Comparison of the Two Models

Comparison of the Various Models for Adsorption

Comparison of the craze-growth model with experiments

Comparison to Other Models

Comparison with Kinetic Models

Comparison with Literature Models

Comparison with Models

Comparison with Numerical Model

Comparison with Phenomenological Models, Advantages and Limitations

Comparison with Simpler Models

Comparison with scaling and exponential models

Comparison with single-flux model

Comparisons of models

Confidence intervals, predictive model comparisons

Correlation coefficient, predictive model comparisons

Discussion. Comparison of models

Dispersed plug flow model comparison

Dispersion comparisons with other models

Dry reforming comparison between experiment and various models

Economic comparison model

Grain model comparison with experiment

Heat transfer model comparison

Hydrologic models model comparisons

Ideal Mixing Model Comparison with the Yalkowsky and Bolton Approach

Inverse models/modeling comparison with measurements

Kinetic isotope effects, benzophenoneA/iV-dimethylaniline proton-transfer semiclassical/quantum model comparisons

Kinetic model of the photoinitiated polymerization and its comparison with experimental data

Mathematical models comparison with experiment

Measurement method comparison data model

Metabolic control models comparisons

Metabolism model comparisons

Model Compound Comparisons

Model comparison hierarchical

Model mechanism comparison

Nanopore model comparison

Numerical modelling measurements comparison

Permeability coefficient modeling comparisons

Population Analysis for Statistical Model Comparison

Predicted results of the composite model and comparison with experiments

Reynolds number model predictions comparison

Rheological models comparison

Root-mean-square-deviation Modeller comparisons

Single first-order model, comparison

Solvation models calculation comparison

Starch model comparisons

Statistics method comparison data model

The FEBEX benchmark test. Case definition and comparison of different modelling approaches

Wetting models comparison

© 2024 chempedia.info