Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cellulose acetate membranes stability

The functional stability of GOD membranes has also been enhanced by coupling with an asymmetric ultrafiltration membrane (Koyama et al., 1980). The GOD-cellulose acetate membrane used was prepared as follows 250 mg cellulose triacetate was dissolved in 5 ml dichloro-methane, the solution was mixed with 0.2 ml 50% glutaraldehyde and 1 ml l,8-diamino-4-amino methyl octane and sprayed onto a glass plate. After three days the membrane was removed from the support and immersed in 1% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 35°C, rinsed with water and exposed for 2-3 h to phosphate buffer, pH 7.7, containing 1 mg/ml GOD. The membrane was then treated with sodium tetraborate, rinsed with water and stored at 4-lO°C until use. It was combined with the ultrafiltration membrane in the following way 20 mg cellulose diacetate was dissolved in 35 g formamide and 45 g acetone and cast on a glass plate. At room temperature the solvents evaporated within a few seconds and a membrane of about 30 pm thickness remained, which was kept in ice water for 1 h before application in the sensor. [Pg.99]

In the fall of 1966, researchers at North Star Research Institute began a search for compression-resistant microporous substrates.19 This effort resulted in the development of microporous sheets of polycarbonate (Lexan) and poly-sulfone (Udel).20 Figure 5.4 shows a graph comparing the flux levels and flux stability for three membranes made at that time (a) float-cast cellulose acetate on microporous polysulfone, (b) float-cast cellulose acetate on a mixed cellulose ester microfilter support and (c) a standard asymmetric cellulose acetate membrane. The improvement in membrane fluxes was readily apparent, when switching from cellulosic substrates to the microporous polysulfone substrate. [Pg.312]

Insulin deposition in the controlled-release micropump is not expected to be important. While it was significant in one of the prototypes (Figure 4), changing the rate-controlling membrane from a hydrophobic polycarbonate filter to a hydrophilic Cuprophane or cellulose acetate membrane has apparently eliminated the problem. Although the situation may be different as longer-term experiments are performed, presumably the problems that may arise may relate more to the biological stability of the insulin reservoir than to insulin deposition. [Pg.510]

Commercial membranes for CO2 removal are polymer based, and the materials of choice are cellulose acetate, polyimides, polyamides, polysulfone, polycarbonates, and polyeth-erimide [12]. The most tested and used material is cellulose acetate, although polyimide has also some potential in certain CO2 removal applications. The properties of polyimides and other polymers can be modified to enhance the performance of the membrane. For instance, polyimide membranes were initially used for hydrogen recovery, but they were then modified for CO2 removal [13]. Cellulose acetate membranes were initially developed for reverse osmosis [14], and now they are the most popular CO2 removal membrane. To overcome state-of-the-art membranes for CO2 separation, new polymers, copolymers, block copolymers, blends and nanocomposites (mixed matrix membranes) have been developed [15-22]. However, many of them have failed during application because of different reasons (expensive materials, weak mechanical and chemical stability, etc.). [Pg.228]

Glucose oxidase in nontronite on GC Nafion-coated nontronite on GC Nafion-coated nontronite on GC Mercury-plated nontronite on GC Cellulose acetate membrane with montmorillonite or nontronite Screen-printed nontronite Nontronite stabilized catalyst Glucose Methyl viologen Uric acid, dopamine Cu Zn + [Cu(NH3>4]2- Codeine, amitole, purine bases Dopamine Stable, rensable, reduced interference Rednced interference Reduced interference Enhanced selectivity Trace analysis of Cu FI A and voltammetry LOD 0.54 nM... [Pg.310]

A three-enzyme electrode system, such as needed for creatinine measurement, poses a more difficult enzyme-immobilisation problem, in that different enzymes have different immobilisation requirements and their microenvironmental interrelationships need to be optimised. For one creatine sensor, the requisite creatine amidinohydrolase and sarcosine oxidase were immobihsed in polyurethane pre-polymer and PEG-hnked creatinine amidohydrolase was attached via diisocyanate pre-polymer to create a polyurethane adduct [14]. The likelihood of enzyme inactivation with chemical immobih-sation is high, but provided an enzyme preparation survives this, long-term stability is feasible. In the case of these three particular enzymes, a loss of activity resulted from silver ions diffusing from the reference electrode the material solution was to protect the enzyme layer with a diffusion-resisting cellulose acetate membrane. [Pg.48]

D-glucose and the three-enzyme system GOx, mutarotase and invertase for sucrose estimation. A common format was adopted to facihtate design and operation, in this case immobilization method, the fact that all enzymes used were oxidases and that a common detection principle, reoxidation of H2O2 generated product, was chosen (except for ascorbic acid which was estimated directly). Pectin, a natural polysaccharide present in plant cells, was used as a novel matrix to enhance enzyme entrapment and stabilization in the sensors. Interferences related to electrochemi-caUy active compounds present in fruits under study were significantly reduced by inclusion of a suitable cellulose acetate membrane diffusional barrier or by enzymatic inactivation with ascorbate oxidase. Enzyme sensors demonstrated expected response with respect to their substrates, on analyte average concentration of 5 mM. [Pg.177]

L. Wu, J. Chen, D. Du, and H. Ju, Electrochemical immunoassay for CA125 based on cellulose acetate stabilized antigen/colloidal gold nanoparticles membrane. Electrochim. Acta 51, 1208-1214 (2006). [Pg.166]

Traditionally, ultrafilters have been manufactured from cellulose acetate or cellulose nitrate. Several other materials, such as polyvinyl chloride and polycarbonate, are now also used in membrane manufacture. Such plastic-type membranes exhibit enhanced chemical and physical stability when compared with cellulose-based ultrafiltration membranes. An important prerequisite in manufacturing ultrafilters is that the material utilized exhibits low protein adsorptive properties. [Pg.137]

Concentration Method. The concentration procedure that was developed and evaluated was a RO-Donnan dialysis system (4). The initial objective during method development was to conduct membranescreening tests to evaluate the suitability of various RO and ion-exchange membranes. The four membranes considered for final evaluation on the basis of solute rejection, chlorine stability, and artifact production were the cellulose acetate and FT-30 (Film Tec) RO membranes, the Nafion cation-exchange membrane, and the ION AC MA 3475 anion-exchange membrane. [Pg.417]

The first major application of microfiltration membranes was for biological testing of water. This remains an important laboratory application in microbiology and biotechnology. For these applications the early cellulose acetate/cellulose nitrate phase separation membranes made by vapor-phase precipitation with water are still widely used. In the early 1960s and 1970s, a number of other membrane materials with improved mechanical properties and chemical stability were developed. These include polyacrylonitrile-poly(vinyl chloride) copolymers, poly(vinylidene fluoride), polysulfone, cellulose triacetate, and various nylons. Most cartridge filters use these membranes. More recently poly(tetrafluo-roethylene) membranes have come into use. [Pg.287]

Membrane and Membrane Design Most membranes are polymers in nature, but some inorganic membranes have become available. The most common membranes are based on polysulfone, cellulose acetate, polyamide, fluoropolymers, and other compounds. Formation of a symmetric membrane structure is an important element in the success of UF/NF membrane separation (16). The other considerations for membrane separation are as follows (1) separation capabilities (retention or selectivity), (2) separation rate (flux), (3) chemical and mechanical stabilities, and (4) membrane material cost. [Pg.2847]

Binyamin, Chen and Heller reported that wired enzyme electrodes constituted of glassy carbon electrodes coated with poly(4-vinylpyridine) complexed with [Os(bpy)2Cl] and quarternized with 2-bromoethylamine or poly[(iV-vinylimidazole) complexed with [Os(4,4 -dimethyl-2,2 -bypyridine)2Cl] or poly(vinylpyridine) complexed with [Os(4,4 -dimethoxy-2,2 -bypyridine)2Cl] quaternized with methyl groups lost their electrocatalytic activity more rapidly in serum or saline phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) in the presence of urate and transitional metal ions such as Zn and Fe " " than in plain saline phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). It was reported that as much as two-thirds of the current is lost in 2 h in some anodes. However, when a composite membrane of cellulose acetate, Nafion, and the polyaziridine-cross-linked co-polymer of poly(4-vinyl pyridine) quaternized with bromoacetic acid was applied, the glucose sensor stability in serum was improved and maintained for at least 3 days [27,50]. [Pg.344]

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of an ITP-apparatus. a = PT-electrode b = terminating electrolyte c = drain d = silicone septum e = UV-detector f = conductivity (potential gradient) detector g = silicone septum h = semi-permeable membrane (e.g. cellulose acetate) i = Pt-electrode. p and q lead to a current-stabilized power supply (20 kV). The separation compartment is a PTFE-capi1lary (I.D. =... Figure 2. Schematic diagram of an ITP-apparatus. a = PT-electrode b = terminating electrolyte c = drain d = silicone septum e = UV-detector f = conductivity (potential gradient) detector g = silicone septum h = semi-permeable membrane (e.g. cellulose acetate) i = Pt-electrode. p and q lead to a current-stabilized power supply (20 kV). The separation compartment is a PTFE-capi1lary (I.D. =...
Cellulose acetate (CA), the acetate ester of cellulose, is one of the most commonly used biocompatible materials for the preparation of semi-permeable membranes to be used for dialysis, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis. CA membranes have very low absorption characteristics and thermal stability with high flow rates. Cellulose-based materials are also widely used in the bio-pharmaceutical industry as the matrix for adsorbent beads and membranes. Moreover, CA nanofibers can be used as carrier for delivery of vitamins or pharmaceutical products [15]. [Pg.563]


See other pages where Cellulose acetate membranes stability is mentioned: [Pg.207]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.676]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.391]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.251 ]




SEARCH



Cellulose acetate

Cellulose acetate membrane

Cellulose acetate membranes enzyme stability

Cellulose membranes

Cellulose stabilization

Cellulosics cellulose acetate

Membrane stabilization

Membrane stabilizers

© 2024 chempedia.info