Catalyst concentration changes

The relative effectiveness of nucleating agents in a polymer can be determined by measuring recrystallization exotherms of samples molded at different temperatures (105). The effect of catalyst concentration and filler content has been determined on unsaturated polyesters by using dynamic thermal techniques (124). Effects of formulation change on the heat of mbber vulcanization can be determined by dsc pressurized cells may be needed to reduce volatilization during the cure process (125). 

In a differential reactor the concentration change, i.e., the conversion increase, is kept so low that the effect of the concentration and temperature changes can be neglected. On the other hand the concentration change must be quantitatively known because, multiplied by the flow rate and divided by the catalyst quantity, it measures the reaction rate as ... 

The inner balance accounts for the chemical changes over the W kg catalyst by expressing the difference between the large flow times the small concentration change from in to out over the catalyst bed. 

The outer balance gives the overall change between the outside boundaries of the RR system. The chemical change that occurred over the W kg catalyst is now expressed as the difference between the small flow times the large concentration change between in and out of the RR system. 

This example shows again that if the recycle ratio is high, errors do not cause much of a problem. In reality, it is not the recycle ratio, but rather the high recycle flow and the very small concentration change through the catalyst bed that helps to cut the significance of mistakes. 

In comparison with catalytic reactions in compressed CO2 alone, many transition metal complexes are much more soluble in ionic liquids without the need for special ligands. Moreover, the ionic liquid catalyst phase provides the potential to activate and tune the organometallic catalyst. Furthermore, product separation from the catalyst is now possible without exposure of the catalyst to changes of temperature, pressure, or substrate concentration. 

It is necessary to note the limitation of the approach to the study of the polymerization mechanism, based on a formal comparison of the catalytic activity with the average oxidation degree of transition metal ions in the catalyst. The change of the activity induced by some factor (the catalyst composition, the method of catalyst treatment, etc.) was often assumed to be determined only by the change of the number of active centers. Meanwhile, the activity (A) of the heterogeneous polymerization catalyst depends not only on the surface concentration of the propagation centers (N), but also on the specific activity of one center (propagation rate constant, Kp) and on the effective catalyst surface (Sen) as well ... 

Two thermocouples, Em at x = 0 and Ex at a distance x, permit the monitoring of the atomic hydrogen concentration change along the side-tube. The atoms recombining on the thermocouple tip covered by the active catalyst evolve the heat of reaction and thus the thermoelectric power becomes a relative measure of the concentration of atoms in the gas phase. Finally, one obtains for the direct use in an experimental work the following equation... 

The presence of catalysts markedly changes the deflagration rate. The greatest rate increase is produced by copper chromite, a well-known hydrogenation catalyst. Some additives which catalyze the process at higher pressures may inhibit it strongly at lower pressures. The catalyst effect is related to catalyst particle-size and concentration, but these factors have not been studied extensively. 

Fig. 2a-c. Kinetic zone diagram for the catalysis at redox modified electrodes a. The kinetic zones are characterized by capital letters R control by rate of mediation reaction, S control by rate of subtrate diffusion, E control by electron diffusion rate, combinations are mixed and borderline cases b. The kinetic parameters on the axes are given in the form of characteristic currents i, current due to exchange reaction, ig current due to electron diffusion, iji current due to substrate diffusion c. The signpost on the left indicates how a position in the diagram will move on changing experimental parameters c% bulk concentration of substrate c, Cq catalyst concentration in the film Dj, Dg diffusion coefficients of substrate and electrons k, rate constant of exchange reaction k distribution coefficient of substrate between film and solution d> film thickness (from ref. 

Film diffusion may influence the overall reaction because of the low gas flow rate. As the bulk concentrations change little with time along the length of the reactor, an assumption of constant difference between bulk and catalyst surface concentrations is used in this study and the rate constants will change with gas flow rates. Nevertheless, the activation energies will remain constant, and the proposed reaction kinetics still provides useful hint for understanding the reaction mechanism and optimizing the reactor and operation conditions. 

P 62] The acid cleavage was carried out at 45-75 °C at a pressure of 1-5 bar. Water may be added at levels of 0.3-1 wt.-% [64]. This addition was made upstream of the micro reactor or directly inside. The residence time was set in the range 0.5-5 min. Sulfuric acid was used as catalyst. By changing residence time and acid addition, the residual cumene hydroperoxide content was favorably reduced to 0.1-0.3 wt.-%. For this, an acid concentration of 50-500 ppm is typically required. Part of the so cleaved product stream may be recycled. 

The catalyst concentration can be varied in a wide range for the above-mentioned parameter set, without changing the reaction kinetics [9]. Since gas/liquid micro reactors span a broad range of residence times, typically much shorter than for conventional apparatus, this allows a flexible adaptation of the test procedure to the needs of micro flow characterization. 

If the formation and breakdown steps of a mechanism involving a tetrahedral intermediate respond differently to changes in pH or catalyst concentration, then one can find evidence from plots of rate versus pH or rate versus catalyst concentration for a change in rate determining step and thus for a multistep mechanism. An example would be the maximum seen in the pH rate profile for the formation of an imine from a weakly basic amine (such as hydroxylamine). On the alkaline side of the maximum, the rate determining step is the acid-catalyzed dehydration of the preformed carbinolamine on the acid side of the maximum, the rate determining step is the uncatalyzed addition of the amine to form the carbinolamine. The rate decreases on the acid side of the maximum because more and more of the amine is protonated and unable to react. 

This same [e] experimental protocol leads to a graphical overlay plot that yields valuable kinetic information if the two experiments described in Table 50.1 are plotted together as reaction rate vs. [2], the two curves will fall on top of one another ( overlay ) over the range of [2] common to both only if the rate is not significantly influenced by changes in the overall catalyst concentration within the cycle, including catalyst activation, deactivation or product inhibition. Overlay in same excess plots, therefore, may be used to confirm catalyst robustness or identify problems such as catalyst deactivation or product inhibition. 

The fractions from elution chromatography were studied by a number of spectroscopic methods, n.m.r., i.r., u.v., fluorescence and phosphorescence spectroscopy. Equivalent fractions from chromatographic separation of the various oils showed no significant differences in their spectra and it appears that the composition of the fractions was independent of the catalyst concentration used to produce the oil. Though, as previously mentioned the amounts of the various fractions especially the polar fractions differ with the catalyst concentration. G.1.C. analysis of the saturate fractions also indicated no changes with different catalyst concentrations. 

The spectroscopic evidence indicates that the catalyst concentration had very little effect on the "gross" hydrocarbon structure present and this is substantiated by the H/C atomic ratios of the oils which showed no significant change with catalyst concentration. 

The heteroatom content and viscosity are reduced while the gross hydrocarbon structure is little changed. However, for economic reasons high catalyst concentrations are unlikely to be used. 

Another pertinent observation is the fact that the reaction proceeded twice as fast in -butyraldehyde (polar) as in benzene (nonpolar), even though the catalyst concentration was reduced to only one-third the comparable level. A graphic illustration of this effect is given in Fig. 9. The rate of gas uptake is plotted as a function of time for a reaction conducted in benzene and again for a second reaction conducted in butyraldehyde. The rate of reaction in the polar solvent was initially fast and decreased with time. The rate in the nonpolar benzene was initially slow, became faster as the solvent became more polar with the presence of product aldehyde, and then subsequently diminished with time. When the data were replotted as the log of unreacted olefin vs. time, the polar medium reaction showed first-order dependence on olefin concentration, whereas the nonpolar solvent reaction showed no definite order, owing to the constantly changing polarity. 

As shown in Table I, at 0.1 mM Ru (C0) 2 concentration, CO pressure has little if any effect on activity. On the other hand, at fixed pressure, the concentration of ruthenium carbonyl has a dramatic effect on activity (see Figure 2). At 0.1 mM Ru CCO), ruthenium carbonyl is very active for the WGSR, small decreases in catalyst concentration lead to substantial increases in activity, and no activity dependenee on CO pressure is observed. At concentrations of 0.5 mM or more, less activity is observed, changes in concentration cause smaller effects in activity and rate dependence on pressure is manifested. Diffusion effects have been shown to be unimportant (26). 

A square concentration pulse flow technique has been developed to study the kinetics of catalytic reactions over catalysts which change their stoichiometry in response to the reaction conditions. The technique makes it possible to obtain hysteresis-free kinetics data while greatly reducing the time during which the catalyst is exposed to the reaction mixture. 

In a batch vessel, the reactants are loaded at once, then the concentration changes with time, but at any one time it is uniform throughout. The horizontal portion of Fig 4.1(b) corresponds to a period before reaction starts, before injection of catalyst, say, or before the temperature has been adjusted properly. 

Compared with IR and Raman spectroscopies, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy has had only limited use in heterogeneous catalysis. Nevertheless, this spectroscopy can provide information on concentration changes of organic compounds dissolved in a liquid phase in contact with a solid catalyst, be used to characterize adsorbates on catalytic surfaces, provide information on the... 

B—All substances involved, directly or indirectly, in the rate-determining step will change the rate when their concentrations are changed. The ion is required in the balanced chemical equation, so it cannot be a spectator ion, and it must appear in the mechanism. Catalysts will change the rate of a reaction. Since H does not affect the rate, the reaction is zero order with respect to this ion. 

---