Different Catalysts

B. A. Kottes Andrews and R. M. Reinhardt, "How Mixed Catalysts Differ," paper presented at the Fourth Mnnual Natural Fibers Textile Conference, New Orleans, La., Sept. 14—16, 1981. 

Aldehydes and ketones are similar in their response to hydrogenation catalysis, and an ordering of catalyst activities usually applies to both functions. But the difference between aliphatic and aromatic carbonyls is marked, and preferred catalysts differ. In hydrogenation of aliphatic carbonyls, hydrogenolysis seldom occurs, unless special structural features are present, but with aryl carbonyls either reduction to the alcohol or loss of the hydroxy group can be achieved at will. 

The application of these catalysts in the initial state (without any special treatment of the surface organometallic complexes of such cata-lysts) for ethylene polymerization has been described above. The catalysts formed by the reaction of 7r-allyl compounds with Si02 and AUOj were found to be active in the polymerization of butadiene as well (8, 142). The stereospecificity of the supported catalyst differed from that of the initial ir-allyl compounds. n-Allyl complexes of Mo and W supported on silica were found to be active in olefin disproportionation (142a). 

For the reaction of stannic chloride with toluene (this aromatic being used here because of the lower effectiveness of the catalyst), different kinetics were obtained the rate expression being... 

TPB is produced by the reaction of tetrapropylene (see page 65) with benzene in the presence of aluminum chloride or hydrogen fluoride as catalyst. The reaction conditions for both catalysts differ insignificantly from each other. 

Nevertheless, we should admit the major conclusion of the study by Morrison [8] that the task of attaining selectivity of gas sensors while using catalysts differs from that to obtain selectivity in catalytic reaction as justified. During gas detection one should make use of selectivity of reactants and the stress is placed on the study of capability to accelerate or slow down reaction of above particles whereas catalysis requires a selectivity with respect to products obtained necessitating tiie studies and monitoring of all stages of the process. Therefore, the direct use of catalysts of known reactions does not ensure obtaining desired results. However, in the cases when side products and reaction products do not... 

In Sn/V/Nb/Sb/O catalysts, different compoimds form (10) mtile Sn02 (also incorporating Sb, Sb/Nb mixed oxide and non-stoichiometric mtile-type V/Nb/Sb/O the latter segregates preferentially at the smface of the catalyst. Tin oxide (cassiterite) provides the matrix for the dispersion of the active components therefore, a variation of the value of x in Sn/V/Nb/Sb x/0.2/1/3 catalysts imphes a... 

Figure 45.2 ATR single beam spectmm of a catalyst thin-film on ZnSe crystal under argon upon UV-irradiation (a) P Ti02 catalyst, (b) Pd/AbOs catalyst, and (c) Au/T102 catalyst difference spectra reveals the background shift on (d) Pd/Ti02 catalyst, (e) Pd/Al203 catalyst, and (f) Au/Ti02 catalyst.

A reasonable throughput screening equipment consisting of six parallel reactor tubes was constructed. The system operates continuously and can be used for screening of various catalysts, different particle sizes and temperatures. Gas, gas-sohd and gas-solid-liquid applications are possible. The screening equipment is coupled to gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis. The constraction principles, the equipment as well as the application of the equipment is demonstrated with three-phase catalytic systems. 

In the present work, the transient reaetivity and the ehanges of the snrface charaeteristies of an eqnihbrated VPP in response to modifications of the gas-phase composition have been investigated. As the VN atomic ratio is one of the most important factors affecting the catalytic performance of the VPP (6), two catalysts differing in VN ratio were stndied. Data obtained were used to draw a model about the nature of the surface active layer, and on how die latter is modified in function of the reaction conditions. 

However, it will at any rate be clear now that the palladium, nickel, and iridium catalysts used in our experiments differ widely in surface characteristics, as is evident from the variations in chemisorptive behavior. An obvious question that may be asked now is whether the catalysts differ also in catalytic behavior. This induced us to study the reaction of benzene with deuterium on the nickel and iridium catalysts. 

The transformation of n-hexadecane was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor at 220°C under a 30 bar total pressure on bifunctional Pt-exchanged HBEA catalysts differing only by the zeolite crystallites size. The activities of the catalysts and especially the reaction scheme depended strongly on the crystallites size. Monobranched isomers were the only primary reaction products formed with the smallest crystallites, while cracking was the main reaction observed with the biggest crystallites. This was explained in terms of number of zeolite acidic sites encountered by the olefinic intermediates between two platinum particles. 

The E/Z ratio of the isomers formed over a supported Pd catalyst differed from that obtained with the homogeneous counterpart. The activity of the catalyst under the action of microwave and conventional conditions was comparable, but micro-wave irradiation improved yields and reduced reaction times. 

Insertion of the alkyne into the Pd-H bond is the first step in the proposed catalytic cycle (Scheme 8), followed by insertion of the alkene and /3-hydride elimination to yield either the 1,4-diene (Alder-ene) or 1,3-diene product. The results of a deuterium-labeling experiment performed by Trost et al.46 support this mechanism. 1H NMR studies revealed 13% deuterium incorporation in the place of Ha, presumably due to exchange of the acetylenic proton, and 32% deuterium incorporation in the place of Hb (Scheme 9). An alternative Pd(n)-Pd(iv) mechanism involving palladocycle 47 (Scheme 10) has been suggested for Alder-ene processes not involving a hydridopalladium species.47 While the palladium acetate and hydridopalladium acetate systems both lead to comparable products, support for the existence of a unique mechanism for each catalyst is derived from the observation that in some cases the efficacies of the catalysts differ dramatically.46... 

Catalysts differ in their ability to promote double-bond migration and cis-trans isomerization, in their thermodynamic and mechanistic selectivities in diene hydrogenation and in their tendencies to catalyze 1,2-, 3,4-, or 1,4-addition34. 

From a practical point of view, data obtained by CA methods are more useful. Figure 15.8 shows examples of the CA curves obtained in 0.5 M ethanol solution in 0.1 M HCIO4 at an anodic potential of 600 mV vs. SCE. In both of the CA curves there is a sharp initial current drop in the first 5 min, followed by a slower decay. The sharp decrease might be related to a double layer thus indicating that the catalysts differ mainly in their active area based on the above CV experiments in acid solution. In longer runs it was found that the current (j after 30 min polarization at 600 mV vs. SCE) obtained on PtSn-1 electrodes is higher than that on PtSn-2. The quasi-steady-state current density stabilized for both the catalysts within 0.5 h at the potential hold. The final current densities on PtSn-1 and PtSn-2 electrodes after holding the cell potential at 600 mV vs. SCE for 30 min were 3.5 and 0.3 mA, respectively. 

In the presence of these solid catalysts, different anilines—even deactivated by both electronic and steric effects—yield the corresponding mono-A-methyl derivatives [ArNHMe] with selectivities of 93-98%, at conversions up to 95% (Scheme 4.8). ... 

With both approaches, it is key to establish the current regions where samples are under kinetic control to allow the correct comparison. Many reported comparisons of catalysfs in MEA sfrucfures point to differences in performance, which are attributed to intrinsic catalyst differences when it is clear that differences are due to mass fransport effects because of catalyst layer structure. To help overcome these difficulties, it is recommended that, for catalyst evaluation, pure reactants be used (e.g., O2 instead of air) and at relatively high stoichiometries. Use of current-voltage curves should be corrected for elecfrolyte or membrane resistances and Tafel analysis used to identify fhe kinefically confrolled current regions. 

The requirement of small structural differences within the series of reactants for obtaining a LFER has its parallel in series of catalysts. Meaningful values of result only when the catalysts operate principally in the same way, that is, when the reaction mechanism is basically the same. This is most likely to occur when the catalysts differ only by minor modifications in the method of preparation or when their composition is only slightly modified by the addition of promoters. With chemically different catalysts the similarity is achieved when the active centers have as their decisive component a common species, for example, protons on solid acidic catalysts. 

Finally, the side-by-side comparison of five major types of commercially available SOx additives show that these materials differ not only in initial activity but also in regenerability, or the ability of the material to release SO2. We can rank these materials but have left unanswered the important questions as to why these catalysts differ especially in regenerability. 

Under FCCU operating conditions, almost 100% of the metal contaminants in the feed (such as nickel, vanadium, iron and copper porphyrins) are decomposed and deposited on the catalyst (2). The most harmful of these contaminants are vanadium and nickel. The deleterious effect of the deposited vanadium on catalyst performance and the manner in which vanadium is deposited on the cracking catalyst differ from those of nickel. The effect of vanadium on the catalyst performance is primarily a decrease in catalyst activity while the major effect of nickel is a selectivity change reflected in increased coke and gas yields (3). Recent laboratory studies (3-6) show that nickel distributes homogeneously over the catalyst surface while vanadium preferentially deposits on and reacts destructively with the zeolite. A mechanism for vanadium poisoning involving volatile vanadic acid as the... 

A typical ATR reactor consists of a burner, a combustion chamber and a refractory-lined pressure vessel where the catalyst or catalysts are placed. The key elements in the reactor are the burner and the catalyst. Different geometries for ATR reactors have been proposed, considering, for instance, fixed beds or fluidized beds. 

It is of importance to draw a distinction between additions which are sensitive toward oxygen and those which are not sensitive toward oxygen. For instance, metallic potassium, under the influence of oxygen, forms potassium oxide, and the promoting effect of the latter differs from that of the alkali-metal. The same element can act on the catalyst differently, depending on whether it is present as the oxide, chloride, or other compound. ... 

It appears that the four VPO catalysts differ in the LRS spectra by the relative... 

The activity of polymer-supported crown ethers depends on solvent. As shown in Fig. 11, rates for Br-I exchange reactions with catalysts 34 and 41 increased with a change in solvent from toluene to chlorobenzene. Since the reaction with catalyst 34 is limited substantially by intrinsic reactivity (Fig. 10), the rate increase must be due to an increase in intrinsic reactivity. The reaction with catalyst 41 is limited by both intrinsic reactivity and intraparticle diffusion (Fig. 10), and the rate increase from toluene to chlorobenzene corresponds with increases in both parameters. Solvent effects on rates with polymer-supported phase transfer catalysts differ from those with soluble phase transfer catalysts60. With the soluble catalysts rates increase (for a limited number of reactions) with decreased polarity of solvent60), while with the polymeric catalysts rates increase with increased polarity of solvent74). Solvents swell polymer-supported catalysts and influence the microenvironment of active sites as well as intraparticle diffusion. The microenvironment, especially hydration... 

Figure 6 illustrates the comparison between once-through and recycle cracking in fixed-bed operation. An illustration of moving-bed recycling is also shown. These two curves are not to be compared, as both charge stock and catalyst differ in the two examples. 

Fig. 9. Electric field E and concentration C of a reactant for a fast reaction catalyzed by a porous solid for transmission and ATR geometries. The dotted line represents the IR beam path. The electric field E is represented as a solid line, and the concentration C of a hypothetical reactant is represented as a dashed line. In the ATR experiment, the electric field is evanescent and decays exponentially with distance z from the surface of the IRE. In the transmission experiment, the electric field decreases as a consequence of absorption. The two techniques sample the catalyst differently.

In hydrogenation processes, hydrogen is added to the substrate molecule. The bond to be hydrogenated is, in most cases, a double bond, but it can be a single bond or a triple bond. Using different catalysts, different bonds can be hydrogenated and many different atoms can be involved in the reactions, e.g., C, N, S, O. These hydrogenation processes are performed in many different areas, e.g., in petrochemical-, fine-chemical-, food-, and the pharmaceutical industry [1] to achieve a desired product quality. 

It must be emphasized that the above catalysts differ considerably in their effectiveness. Some give solid polymers but most of the combinations give only liquid polymers. In addition the conversions realized vary widely. 

---