Bulk liquid

A quite different means for the experimental determination of surface excess quantities is ellipsometry. The technique is discussed in Section IV-3D, and it is sufficient to note here that the method allows the calculation of the thickness of an adsorbed film from the ellipticity produced in light reflected from the film covered surface. If this thickness, t, is known, F may be calculated from the relationship F = t/V, where V is the molecular volume. This last may be estimated either from molecular models or from the bulk liquid density. 

It is not uncommon for this situation to apply, that is, for a Gibbs mono-layer to be in only slow equilibrium with bulk liquid—see, for example. Figs. 11-15 and 11-21. This situation also holds, of course, for spread monolayers of insoluble substances, discussed in Chapter IV. The experimental procedure is illustrated in Fig. Ill-19, which shows that a portion of the surface is bounded by bars or floats, an opposing pair of which can be moved in and out in an oscillatory manner. The concomitant change in surface tension is followed by means of a Wilhelmy slide. Thus for dilute aqueous solutions of a methylcellu-... 

This rule is approximately obeyed by a large number of systems, although there are many exceptions see Refs. 15-18. The rule can be understood in terms of a simple physical picture. There should be an adsorbed film of substance B on the surface of liquid A. If we regard this film to be thick enough to have the properties of bulk liquid B, then 7a(B) is effectively the interfacial tension of a duplex surface and should be equal to 7ab + VB(A)- Equation IV-6 then follows. See also Refs. 14 and 18. 

There has been much activity in the study of monolayer phases via the new optical, microscopic, and diffraction techniques described in the previous section. These experimental methods have elucidated the unit cell structure, bond orientational order and tilt in monolayer phases. Many of the condensed phases have been classified as mesophases having long-range correlational order and short-range translational order. A useful analogy between monolayer mesophases and die smectic mesophases in bulk liquid crystals aids in their characterization (see [182]). 

L. The liquid-expanded, L phase is a two-dimensionally isotropic arrangement of amphiphiles. This is in the smectic A class of liquidlike in-plane structure. There is a continuing debate on how best to formulate an equation of state of the liquid-expanded monolayer. Such monolayers are fluid and coherent, yet the average intermolecular distance is much greater than for bulk liquids. A typical bulk liquid is perhaps 10% less dense than its corresponding solid state. 

It was commented that surface viscosities seem to correspond to anomalously high bulk liquid viscosities. Discuss whether the same comment applies to surface diffusion coefficients. 

The reports were that water condensed from the vapor phase into 10-100-/im quartz or pyrex capillaries had physical properties distinctly different from those of bulk liquid water. Confirmations came from a variety of laboratories around the world (see the August 1971 issue of Journal of Colloid Interface Science), and it was proposed that a new phase of water had been found many called this water polywater rather than the original Deijaguin term, anomalous water. There were confirming theoretical calculations (see Refs. 121, 122) Eventually, however, it was determined that the micro-amoimts of water that could be isolated from small capillaries was always contaminated by salts and other impurities leached from the walls. The nonexistence of anomalous or poly water as a new, pure phase of water was acknowledged in 1974 by Deijaguin and co-workers [123]. There is a mass of fascinating anecdotal history omitted here for lack of space but told very well by Frank [124]. 

The integral A/, while expressible in terms of surface free energy differences, is defined independently of such individual quantities. A contact angle situation may thus be viewed as a consequence of the ability of two states to coexist bulk liquid and thin film. 

The adsorption isotherm corresponding to Eq. X-51 is of the shape shown in Fig. X-1, that is, it cannot explain contact angle phenomena. The ability of a liquid him to coexist with bulk liquid in a contact angle situation suggests that the him structure has been modihed by the solid and is different from that of the liquid, and in an enmirical way, this modihed structure corresponds to an effective vapor pressure F , F representing the vapor pressure that bulk liquid would have were its structure that of the... 

There is no reason why the distortion parameter should not contain an entropy as well as an energy component, and one may therefore write 0 = 0q-sT. The entropy of adsorption, relative to bulk liquid, becomes A5fi = sexp(-ca). A critical temperature is now implied, Tc = 0o/s, at which the contact angle goes to zero [151]. For example, Tc was calculated to be 174°C by fitting adsorption and contact angle data for the -octane-PTFE system. 

An interesting question that arises is what happens when a thick adsorbed film (such as reported at for various liquids on glass [144] and for water on pyrolytic carbon [135]) is layered over with bulk liquid. That is, if the solid is immersed in the liquid adsorbate, is the same distinct and relatively thick interfacial film still present, forming some kind of discontinuity or interface with bulk liquid, or is there now a smooth gradation in properties from the surface to the bulk region This type of question seems not to have been studied, although the answer should be of importance in fluid flow problems and in formulating better models for adsorption phenomena from solution (see Section XI-1). 

The microscopic contour of a meniscus or a drop is a matter that presents some mathematical problems even with the simplifying assumption of a uniform, rigid solid. Since bulk liquid is present, the system must be in equilibrium with the local vapor pressure so that an equilibrium adsorbed film must also be present. The likely picture for the case of a nonwetting drop on a flat surface is... 

Returning to more surface chemical considerations, most literature discussions that relate adhesion to work of adhesion or to contact angle deal with surface free energy quantities. It has been pointed out that structural distortions are generally present in adsorbed layers and must be present if bulk liquid adsorbate forms a finite contact angle with the substrate (see Ref. 115). Thus both the entropy and the energy of adsorption are important (relative to bulk liquid). The... 

The state of an adsorbate is often described as mobile or localized, usually in connection with adsorption models and analyses of adsorption entropies (see Section XVII-3C). A more direct criterion is, in analogy to that of the fluidity of a bulk phase, the degree of mobility as reflected by the surface diffusion coefficient. This may be estimated from the dielectric relaxation time Resing [115] gives values of the diffusion coefficient for adsorbed water ranging from near bulk liquids values (lO cm /sec) to as low as 10 cm /sec. 

This description is traditional, and some further comment is in order. The flat region of the type I isotherm has never been observed up to pressures approaching this type typically is observed in chemisorption, at pressures far below P. Types II and III approach the line asymptotically experimentally, such behavior is observed for adsorption on powdered samples, and the approach toward infinite film thickness is actually due to interparticle condensation [36] (see Section X-6B), although such behavior is expected even for adsorption on a flat surface if bulk liquid adsorbate wets the adsorbent. Types FV and V specifically refer to porous solids. There is a need to recognize at least the two additional isotherm types shown in Fig. XVII-8. These are two simple types possible for adsorption on a flat surface for the case where bulk liquid adsorbate rests on the adsorbent with a finite contact angle [37, 38]. 

As with the BET equation, a number of modihcations of Eqs. XVII-77 or XVn-79 have been proposed, for example Ref. 71. FHH-type equations go to inhnite him thickness (i.e., bulk liquid), as P - F and this cannot be the case if the liquid does not wet the solid, and Adamson [72] proposed... 

The first term on the right is the common inverse cube law, the second is taken to be the empirically more important form for moderate film thickness (and also conforms to the polarization model, Section XVII-7C), and the last term allows for structural perturbation in the adsorbed film relative to bulk liquid adsorbate. In effect, the vapor pressure of a thin multilayer film is taken to be P and to relax toward P as the film thickens. The equation has been useful in relating adsorption isotherms to contact angle behavior (see Section X-7). Roy and Halsey [73] have used a similar equation earlier, Halsey [74] allowed for surface heterogeneity by assuming a distribution of Uq values in Eq. XVII-79. Dubinin s equation (Eq. XVII-75) has been mentioned another variant has been used by Bonnetain and co-workers [7S]. 

Returning to multilayer adsorption, the potential model appears to be fundamentally correct. It accounts for the empirical fact that systems at the same value of / rin P/F ) are in essentially corresponding states, and that the multilayer approaches bulk liquid in properties as P approaches F. However, the specific treatments must be regarded as still somewhat primitive. The various proposed functions for U r) can only be rather approximate. Even the general-appearing Eq. XVn-79 cannot be correct, since it does not allow for structural perturbations that make the film different from bulk liquid. Such perturbations should in general be present and must be present in the case of liquids that do not spread on the adsorbent (Section X-7). The last term of Eq. XVII-80, while reasonable, represents at best a semiempirical attempt to take structural perturbation into account. 

Given the interest and importance of chiral molecules, there has been considerable activity in investigating die corresponding chiral surfaces [, and 70]. From the point of view of perfomiing surface and interface spectroscopy with nonlinear optics, we must first examhie the nonlinear response of tlie bulk liquid. Clearly, a chiral liquid lacks inversion synnnetry. As such, it may be expected to have a strong (dipole-allowed) second-order nonlinear response. This is indeed true in the general case of SFG [71]. For SHG, however, the pemiutation synnnetry for the last two indices of the nonlinear susceptibility tensor combined with the... 

Figure Bl.22.6. Raman spectra in the C-H stretching region from 2-butanol (left frame) and 2-butanethiol (right), each either as bulk liquid (top traces) or adsorbed on a rough silver electrode surface (bottom). An analysis of the relative intensities of the different vibrational modes led to tire proposed adsorption structures depicted in the corresponding panels [53], This example illustrates the usefiilness of Raman spectroscopy for the detennination of adsorption geometries, but also points to its main limitation, namely the need to use rough silver surfaces to achieve adequate signal-to-noise levels.

Equilibration of the interface, and the establislnnent of equilibrium between the two phases, may be very slow. Holcomb et al [183] found that the density profile p(z) equilibrated much more quickly than tire profiles of nonnal and transverse pressure, f yy(z) and f jfz), respectively. The surface tension is proportional to the z-integral of Pj z)-Pj z). The bulk liquid in the slab may continue to contribute to this integral, indicatmg lack of equilibrium, for very long times if the initial liquid density is chosen a little too high or too low. A recent example of this kind of study, is the MD simulation of the liquid-vapour surface of water at temperatures between 316 and 573 K by Alejandre et al [184]. 

Much of tire science of biocompatibility can be reduced to tire principles of how to detennine tire interfacial energies between biopolymer and surface. The biopolymer is considered to be large enough to behave as bulk material witli a surface since (for example) a water cluster containing only 15 molecules and witli a diameter of 0.5 nm already behaves as a bulk liquid [132] it appears tliat most biological macromolecules can be considered to... 

Gronigen molecular simulation (GROMOS) is the name of both a force field and the program incorporating that force field. The GROMOS force field is popular for predicting the dynamical motion of molecules and bulk liquids. It is... 

Optimized potentials for liquid simulation (OPES) was designed for modeling bulk liquids. It has also seen significant use in modeling the molecular dynamics of biomolecules. OPLS uses five valence terms, one of which is an electrostatic term, but no cross terms. 

In Chapter 2, a brief discussion of statistical mechanics was presented. Statistical mechanics provides, in theory, a means for determining physical properties that are associated with not one molecule at one geometry, but rather, a macroscopic sample of the bulk liquid, solid, and so on. This is the net result of the properties of many molecules in many conformations, energy states, and the like. In practice, the difficult part of this process is not the statistical mechanics, but obtaining all the information about possible energy levels, conformations, and so on. Molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are two methods for obtaining this information... 

The simulation of molecules in solution can be broken down into two categories. The first is a list of elfects that are not defined for a single molecule, such as diffusion rates. These types of effects require modeling the bulk liquid as discussed in Chapters 7 and 39. The other type of effect is a solvation effect, which is a change in the molecular behavior due to the presence of a solvent. This chapter addresses this second type of effect. 

This chapter focuses on the simulation of bulk liquids. This is a dilferent task from modeling solvation effects, which are discussed in Chapter 24. Solvation effects are changes in the properties of the solute due to the presence of a solvent. They are defined for an individual molecule or pair of molecules. This chapter discusses the modeling of bulk liquids, which implies properties that are not defined for an individual molecule, such as viscosity. 

Another way of predicting liquid properties is using QSPR, as discussed in Chapter 30. QSPR can be used to And a mathematical relationship between the structure of the individual molecules and the behavior of the bulk liquid. This is an empirical technique, which limits the conceptual understanding obtainable. However, it is capable of predicting some properties that are very hard to model otherwise. For example, QSPR has been very successful at predicting the boiling points of liquids. 

Calculating nonbonded interactions only to a certain distance imparts an error in the calculation. If the cutoff radius is fairly large, this error will be very minimal due to the small amount of interaction at long distances. This is why many bulk-liquid simulations incorporate 1000 molecules or more. As the cutoff radius is decreased, the associated error increases. In some simulations, a long-range correction is included in order to compensate for this error. 

It is also possible to simulate nonequilibrium systems. For example, a bulk liquid can be simulated with periodic boundary conditions that have shifting boundaries. This results in simulating a flowing liquid with laminar flow. This makes it possible to compute properties not measurable in a static fluid, such as the viscosity. Nonequilibrium simulations give rise to additional technical difficulties. Readers of this book are advised to leave nonequilibrium simulations to researchers specializing in this type of work. 

Finally, the molecules in all layers above the first are postulated to have the same partition function 9, as in the bulk liquid, so that 9, = 9, j,j for i > 1. This is of course equivalent to the BET assumption of liquid-like properties for these higher layers. 

In general there are two factors capable of bringing about the reduction in chemical potential of the adsorbate, which is responsible for capillary condensation the proximity of the solid surface on the one hand (adsorption effect) and the curvature of the liquid meniscus on the other (Kelvin effect). From considerations advanced in Chapter 1 the adsorption effect should be limited to a distance of a few molecular diameters from the surface of the solid. Only at distances in excess of this would the film acquire the completely liquid-like properties which would enable its angle of contact with the bulk liquid to become zero thinner films would differ in structure from the bulk liquid and should therefore display a finite angle of contact with it. 

---